I did not see that this site knew about the recent 3,000 word article, with the same title as that of this thread, published by Europhysics News....
There is a difference between pulling the girder off the seat and pushing it. In the pushing situation the expansion is limited to less than 6...
Gamolon, it is very likely you simply don't understand what is going on. The NIST hypothesis of a walk-off to the west cannot possibly work with...
Gamolon's logic is quite short when he says the ARUP WTC 7 analysis cannot be used to show the NIST WTC 7 report was incorrect simply because it...
Scott, thanks for the new link. It is essentially the same information I had linked to earlier from NBC, so I think the 10 slides shown were the...
In addition, NIST never provided an analysis supporting their assertion that a falling WTC 7 northeast corner floor assembly would break the next...
amolon, what is funny here is you got it wrong. The beams never came off their seats. Per NIST the five east side beams framing into girder A2001...
Bob, people like Gamolon and Blues63 are obviously not defending the present official fairytale because they believe it. You know that deep down...
Hi Scott and Bob, I do still bounce around and do a search now and then to see who might be looking at something I have recently done like the...
Separate names with a comma.
