Israel; Iran has no bomb program.

This comment takes Islamophobic scaremongering to new depths.
It's the most juvenile piece of hysterical neoZionist piddle ever to disgrace a political debating forum. Good shot, Reva.

 

Why would the majiis need to ratify this modified code of the subsidiary arrangements? They werent required to ratify the original arrangements were they? They havent had to ratify many of the other modifications Iran has been afforded over the years to help their program grow.

Irans word is crap kilpklap, thats why no one will take them at their word in any kind of agreement, no matter how "generous" you make the offer seems.

Maybe they put up some collateral first instead of the continuous obstruction and secrecy.

Theyve proven their inability to keep their word. You try and let Iran off the hook by blaming the IAEA and then claim the group is some kind of proxy for the US. Then or now this claim is laughable. Iran is the one breaking the law...by "suspending" 3.1. Iran si the one under sanctions for not adhereing to UN resolutions.Iran's program is the one with dossier full of unquestions. Iran is the one defying the international concensus to comply with their agreements. Iran is the one admitting freely they support terrorists.

You almost sound like you feel pity for poor Iran for all the pressure being exerted on them. If you really had any compassion for them you'd start hoping the Iranian regime stops the weapons program,comes clean and saves their people the horrors of war. If Iran feels like theyve been slapped in the face perhaps they should do some introspection. They are their own worst enemy.

Next US...ooops IAEA report should be a good read.

http://www.haaretz.com/print-editio...-nuclear-program-expected-next-month-1.411806

 

The laugh is on you:

One of the stunning omissions in corporate media coverage of the IAEA report are the WikiLeaks disclosures concerning IAEA chief, Yukiya Amano. According to a US Embassy cable from a US diplomat in Vienna, where the IAEA is based, Amano described himself as ‘solidly in the U.S. court on every key strategic decision, from high-level personnel appointments to the handling of Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program.’

http://wikileaks.org/cable/2009/10/09UNVIEVIENNA478.html

 

That disaster will befall Israel, as well as the Middle East in general.

 

Actually the laughs on you.......

Weve already covered this particular smoking gun in this very thread. Thanks for paying attention. In case you havent noticed most of the world is also in the US's court on these very issues.

I think you'll need a bit more to prove come kind of conspiracy against Iran. After all ElBaradei, who was clearly not in 'the US's court' came to many of the same conclusions, appointed the same vital members and took many of the same steps suggested by the "western" warmongers...as far as going on to say Qom was illegal and Iran was in fact breaking the law.

Same leaks also quote Amanos self professed job description....what did he say?

 

Perhaps Iran should do away with their nuclear program then? Maybe let inspectors go where they need to, to prove Irans program is simply for energy as fanboys like yourself and the Iranian regime say it is? Israel will survive, will Iran?

 

It's patently obvious that Iran has never diverted any material for any program other than those monitored. Don't you ever get chaffed with incessant war-mongering ?

 

Sadly this in not the only concern the IAEA has with Irans program,every report since 2003 has made this patently obvious. It is also not the only mandate Iran is required to adhere to. Id much rather have Iran keep their word than go to war. War is entirely dependent on Irans decisions in the next few months. Judging from decades of history Im guessing Iran make bad decisions however. I guess the lure of possessing a nuclear device is just that strong.

 

Iran can engage in the Japan Option within the terms of the NNPT agreement. The fact that no material has been diverted is proof in itself that no attempt is being made to weaponize the program- and the IAEA know that no material has been diverted.

They should go check out the Zionists' 200-400 warheads and do the world a favor.

 

Heres the problem with NPT nations playing hide and seek w/ the IAEA:

http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2011/gov2011-65.pdf

 

Yes, the issue has been covered and your disengenuous 'arguments' were busted.

For US read the US and her allies - as if you didn't know.

ElBaradei didn't come to the same conclusions.

Amanos was quoted as stated.

The truth is, he is the US's man. All informed people know it, only sabre rattlers for war deny it.

 

Iran is in compliance with the agreements it has signed up to. Why not test that in the International Court instead of being led by the nose to war at the behest of neoZionist insanity ?

 

Lol Russia has thousands of nukes pointed straight at us while IRan has none. And you see Iran as the threat.

Its true... our educational system has failed us.

 

Invasion first. Worry about motives as we proceed.

 

Well, intelligent Americans might be a diminishing minority, thanks to tv and all, but it's a fortifying experience to meet up with one. Don't write 'em all off at once.

Edit; I've just been laughing my head off over a Woody Allen movie- hence the uncharacteristic generosity.

Edit 2; Aw heck, Woody is Jewish ! Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

 

Is it "aw heck, it's a Jew!" Mr. Greenie time again, moon?

How time flies.

 

Why, thank you, Talon, for the display of indisputable sectarian gutter-scurrying.

 

It must be shocking to Zionist Holocaust abuse members to be reminded again that moon doesn't hate Semites.

 

You know what, Judge, they simply can't believe that anyone can be jew-friendly and anti-Zionist. For them, the world's jewry are a big, inseparable lump .

Hey, talon, Mel Brooks is extremely funny. And you know what ? He's Jewish ! Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

How about that Stephen Fry dude ? Guy's a fricken polyglot as well as being hilarious. And he's Jewish, I kid you not. Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Aw, come back, Talon, and do your winkies

 

lol...None of my arguments were disingenous and certainly not debunked in any way whatsoever. Read the IAEAs quarterly reports from 2003 on.
Im only repeating what the IAEA itself has said for the last 10 years or so.

Amano was nominated by Japan, elected by majority vote and appointed unamimously by all 145 members....but he's the US's guy. Whos being disingenuous.

Heres is how Amano described his function as DG:

I hate to break it to you but most of the world is in the US's court in decisions and attitudes regarding Iran. Not coincidently, only those with significant investments in Iran are willing to go to bat for them.

ElBaradei was the guy who signed off on almost every round of sanctions,despite his very best efforts to give Iran chance after chance. He's the guy who puts his signatures on the quarterly reports on Iran. He is also the guy who's made no bones about the illegality of some of Irans facilities and practices.

 

Iran lives in another universe. They're not reasonable, they're insane. They believe that in order to bring about the 12th Imam, there has to be an apocalypse.

Is the above quote true about the zealots? If so one feels sad for the decent Iranians, Persians, because should a battle, an all out war, with Israel begin it will not be pleasant. The Israeli forces are the best in the world. The battles will not continue such as in Afghanistan.

 

They're the best at murdering Palestinian children. They killed 400 in just one operation over christmas 2008/9. There will be repercussions.

 

Speaking of reminders...

 

Any idea why anti-Semites make up stuff about Israel, TJ?

 

Talon;

This must be the tenth time that Talon has posted this out-of-context quote in the confused belief that it forms some sort of harassment . I therefore provide the definition of the prefix in the hope that he can learn to discern between the reproduction of an offensive term and an intent to use one offensively.

You'll learn the difference soon enough, Talon, but not before embarrassing yourself further, I foresee. Winkies won't help you either.