Everything's under control...

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Mar 18, 2012.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Waiting on you to answer the question posed to you. Don't be a coward, link up.

    The insult was about PBL. Are you she?
     
  2. I_Gaze_At_The_Blue

    I_Gaze_At_The_Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,988
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Irony ... sometimes it just is !!!
     
  3. I_Gaze_At_The_Blue

    I_Gaze_At_The_Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,988
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Au contraire PBL ... you are attempting to flame, is it some teenage level pleasure you get from it ???

    YOU made certain claims and it is your responsibility to show them ... so PBL can you back up what you state ???
     
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Link to evidence of this claim, please.
     
  5. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Maybe you should start by trying to offer up evidence of claims you've made in this thread. Baby steps.
     
  6. I_Gaze_At_The_Blue

    I_Gaze_At_The_Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,988
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Back up your claims ... or are you really just a pointless troll, flaccidly attempting to flame ???

    My name is NOT Yousef ... your attempt to insult reaches no-where near its intended target ... you really are just too predictable to be anything other than boring.
     
  7. I_Gaze_At_The_Blue

    I_Gaze_At_The_Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,988
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Good of you finally to admit ... that spinning is all you have.

    Now just admit you're another of PBL's really smelly socks and then we can all move along ...
     
  8. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
  9. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    SOCK ALERT!!

    [​IMG]

    I'm betting she won't make 100 posts.

    The mods cleaned out the sock drawer pretty fast last time. :mrgreen:
     
  10. I_Gaze_At_The_Blue

    I_Gaze_At_The_Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,988
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It is getting rather whiffy in here now :wierdface: ... nothing worse than the same dirty laundry messing up the place.
     
  11. I_Gaze_At_The_Blue

    I_Gaze_At_The_Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,988
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nope ... the ONLY truly sad desperate thing here is that you need to pretend so many names to vent the SAME old whines ...
     
  12. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Opening stanza for your soliloquy?
     
  13. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's not about errors
     
  14. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Then what is it about?
     
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So that would be no.
     
  16. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0




    Woe...they called in for MAJOR backup. Pulling out all the stops.


    I guess Mr. Fetzer caused them to hit the panic button.


    For the intelligent reader....go about a year plus back, and look for various posters that were there then, and turn up here now.....AGAIN.. Judge for yourself.
     
  17. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not even 70.

    What name will she use next?
     
  18. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Quote from the Edinburgh Research

    Abstract: This paper uses a finite element model to investigate the stability of the Twin-Towers of the World Trade Center, New York for a number of different fire scenarios. This investigation does not take into account the structural damage caused by the terrorist attack. However the fire scenarios included are based upon the likely fires that could have occurred as a result of the attack. A number of different explanations of how and why the Towers collapsed have appeared since the event. None of these however have adequately focused on the most important issue, namely ‘what structural mechanisms led to the state which triggered the collapse’. Also, quite predictably, there are significant and fundamental differences in the explanations of the WTC collapses on offer so far. A complete consensus on any detailed explanation of the definitive causes and mechanisms of the collapse of these structures is well nigh impossible given the enormous uncertainties in key data (nature of the fires, damage to fire protection, heat transfer to structural members and nature and extent of structural damage for instance). There is however a consensus of sorts that the fires that burned in the structures after the attack had a big part to play in this collapse. The question is how big? Taking this to the extreme, this paper poses the hypothetical question, “had there been no structural damage would the structure have survived fires of a similar magnitude”? A robust but simple computational and theoretical analysis has been carried out to answer this question. Robust because no gross assumptions have been made and varying important parameters over a wide range shows consistent behaviour supporting the overall conclusions. Simple because all results presented can be checked by any structural engineer either theoretically or using widely available structural analysis software tools. The results are illuminating and show that the structural system adopted for the Twin-Towers may have been unusually vulnerable to a major fire. The analysis results show a simple but unmistakable collapse mechanism that owes as much (or more) to the geometric thermal expansion effects as it does to the material effects of loss of strength and stiffness. The collapse mechanism discovered is a simple stability failure directly related to the effect of heating (fire). Additionally, the mechanism is not dependent upon failure of structural connections



    Like I said, it's all about the info used for the inputs.

    Clearly these guys admit, they didn't use the structural damage from the aircraft as part of the analysis, this in itself invalidates this study.

    Furthermore they admit to the "enormous uncertainties in key data".


    So in my opinion this report is, INVALID
     
  19. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have some questions for those who do not believe that 9/11 was in any shape, way, or form anything other than what was reported though: How do you know that the US government didn't have 'any' involvement whatsoever?

    I mean, do you have no doubts? None at all? Everything that you've seen, heard, and/or read has made sense to you about 9/11 since September 11th, 2001?

    Is there not evidence, which would suggest an inside job, that is in existence, but from the 1960s? Operation Northwoods raises a flag in my mind. Does it not raise one in yours? I didn't know anything about Northwoods until last year. I shook my head just as I am now remembering how I felt reading the Wikipedia page about it...and then finding the declassified documents themselves. It made me wonder.

    Alternatively, isn't there evidence that the US government had advanced knowledge of a coming terrorist attack? I know the retort that comes naturally afterward - that they know something was up, but didn't have the specifics. The thing that has bothered me is all of the intelligence the US received from foreign countries. What 'exactly' did those reports indicate? The US was getting reports of it early in 2001. Does this not raise any flags in anybodies mind?
     
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And we all know what truther opinions are like,don't we?....they are free to conduct their study any way they want,in this case,they focused on the fires,not the structural damage, probably because of the oft repeated truther mantra 'no steel framed building has ever collapsed from a fire'
     
  21. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My opinions enough to have you and your cronies gangbanging trying to suppress them or get them completely removed form the board.

    I know when I am taking a lot of flak, I am right on target.
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh please,get off the fargin' cross....someone needs the wood....

    NO ONE is trying to supress you,or censor you and if your posts get removed here,you can bet the moderator had a reason...
     
  23. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,828
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Questions should always be asked.
     

Share This Page