Someone's gotta pay for me and my kids -- Welfare State alive and well.

This woman deserves to be horse whipped!

[video=youtube;bavou_SEj1E]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bavou_SEj1E&feature=related[/video]

 

So you son't want to pay for someone's sex lives but when those people bring kids you don't want to pay for them either. So you either hate women or kids, you choose...

 

Bingo, but don't tell that to your average liberal. They must think anyone conservative is a devout christian. How very naive many of them are. I vote for sterilization for those who have any children while they're on wellfare, but then, I'm not PC at all.

 

Not sure I understand the relevance to this situation.

 

How many times are we going to milk this story? It has been discussed here at least three times

 

Well we know at least one is in jail.

 

You make your bed, you lie in it. Pun intended. Translation: actions have consequences. Don't come crying to me because you neglected to consider that and then expect me to pay for your mistakes.

 

Federal government programs for the welfare of the people initiates lethargy based on the premise that it eradicates personal accountability and responsibility from the individual to provide for the humanitarian needs of other individuals. Accommodating for the welfare of the people is the sole priority of the State(s), and not necessarily the primary responsibility of the U.S. government. State and U.S. government annual budget should provide a safety net (welfare for the people) for those that are medically disabled, the handicapped and for individuals who lost jobs and are/were receiving unemployment benefits and consistently seeking employment.

 

That looks like something from slavery days. But it's still better to help her and her kids rather than give $billions to the Israelis every October 1st. At least they are citizens.

Proverbs 18:23 = The poor plead for help, but the wealthy answer harshly.

 

This sounds like a great idea when you're appalled or scandalized by someone's actions. However, the longer you work in the law, the longer you realize how a law quickly morphs into something you absolutely did not intend for it to turn into.

Rather than do all of this, the simpler solution is to put a cap on assistance.

 

You are mistaken.

The Israelis protect our oil interest in the Middle East and server as a butress against the forces of radical Islam.

Most people on welfare are "takers" and not "producers" and they add nothing of value to the world or to our economy.

 

I would rather spend $10 trillion on American rats rather than give the Israelis one copper penny.

 

My granfather a medical doctor headed the last of the classic mutual aid societies its odd when they gave help it was always with mercy and responsibility attached. For an example one woman was fully disabled (blind) so they provided a place to stay and help with needs in return she had to learn a skill she could make money with and do that which was being a sidewalk performer with a classic organ grinders organ and they paid for that, leading to her being self-sufficient for the most part save help shopping and the like. In this womans case she needs a firm hand to say no at some point those are HER children why should the state support them?

 

So you hate the kids because you want to support the adults, they are NOT parents, who refuse to take care of them and leave them with those adults.

 

Until enough on the left finally learn that when you subsidize bad behavior you get more bad behavior and we can do something about it.

 

Of course you would, you are, after all, a liberal.

 

How about neither?

Whatever.

 

Don't think it's a liberal/conservative mindset. I just thing Americans today are too f#$king stupid to keep their private parts locked up.

I say take her kids away. Put her on forced birth control. I don't care what her Constitutional rights are. Her child abuse voids her Constitutional rights.

 

Absolutely, extablish more orphanages/schools for the kids, put them there where they will recieve proper care and discipline and education. Garnish the wages of the mother and the father, after we require by law the mother disclose the who the father is, to help pay the cost and that obligation doesn't end when the children reach majority, they pay the rest of their lives if that is what it takes to pay back the taxpayer.

 

Dependent on the benefits that we give you every month? No problem, just take these drugs!

Yeah, right, it's not coercion.

Why is it common sense? The only advantage that I can see is that it satisfies your desire to see young women punished for having babies. Whether or not the number of babies that a woman has affects your vision of a welfare state has nothing to do with common sense.

 

We have to stop paying these leeches. Put welfare moms to work doing the jobs that Americans do not want to do. They will be too tired to make 15 kids.


_

 

Make them work?! I thought being forced to work to pay for their own kids violates their Constitutional rights?!?........lol

But you are right, these irresponsible breeders will be too tired after actually working.

 

All of this just comes down to an absolute lack of anything resembling moral character. Not moral enough to take care of your responsibilities, to only have as many kids as you can actually care for, to only reproduce with someone who has made a commitment to you and to stand by that commitment. This is a good incentive to start teaching morals in school again - if kids can't learn morals from their parents, maybe they can learn them in school.

 

BTW, where's Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson?

 

Progressives don't want moral people; they want sheep.

_