Your "translation" is just projection. Now kid, your link does nothing to support your claim that removal of the materials from ground zero was "illegal". I've asked you pertinant and relevant questions which you've dodged. In fact all you've done is wave your holy book around and post some dumb truther video as if it could ward off the evil spirits of reality. The world does not work according to your extremely limited and fundementally flawed understanding of logic and science, therefore you fail and I take your inability to support your claim as proof that it was incorrect to begin with.
Show us what each persons' opinion on that list is in regards to the attacks. Why would they have to be in on it? That makes no sense at all.
You claimed several dozen were involved so who were they? Ignoring the question again solidifies your inability to back up your claim.
And you first claimed it didn't have to be thousands. You have still failed miserably at informing us which of the numerous conspiracy theories you believe and why it wouldn't take thousands. As for several dozen, you had the 19 hijackers, Osama, KSM, and several others who were known to be in on the attack. Do we know all the financers? No. We don't have jurisdiction to demand the financial records in foreign countries. So man up, SS. Quit running away and quit the childish games like demanding to know the personal opinions of 55,000 people. Are you here to play games or are you here to debate? Either way is fine by me. Either way you lose.
Of course it makes no sense when one has no sense to begin with. All it takes is one person to discover the conspiracy and it is all over. Since there is no outcome for those involved in the conspiracy except death if discovered, are you honestly asking everyone to believe they wouldn't cover ALL their bases and would leave themselves open to discovery? Leaving yourself open to discovery might make sense to a truther, but for people here in the real world it is tantamount to suicide.
You guys get worse every time I look at these threads. At least there was a time you would attempt to support your claims but now all you do is spew garbage. Have fun with that.
Run away, SS. It is all you're good at. Why can't you address the very real point that those behind the conspiracy would be facing the death penalty and thus would want to cover every conceivable base? Is this too much for you to grasp? Do you have a counter argument you would like to put forward? Or is all you have left petty insults and snide comments as you run away from the facts.
Ow wow! Lol......like I said. Have fun with that. Accuse me of running away again and that might work. It might actually get me to believe for a split second you guys are sincere. okay, no it won't. You guys have proven you are not sincere and don't care what happened or how many lives it has cost between then and now.
What a juvenile tactic...running away whilst flinging back insults besmirching our sincerity...... bra-VO You truthers SERIOUSLY need to grow up.
I wasn't questioning the sincerity or guessing about it because i know it simply is not there. Every single time you guys are shown valid questions you come up with the most bizarre loose fitting explanations then accuse truthers of doing that very thing. Someone (believe Hannibal) said dozens were involved. I asked who. He completely failed to even attempt to back up his claim. Basically, when I see someone sincere I will debate in earnest but I will not waste my time on posters I know are not sincere.
Your claim is pure and utter bull(*)(*)(*)(*). The whole reason I am here is because I can't stand pissant truthers using the deaths of the victims of 9/11 for political, hate or monitary gain. I've debated you before on 9/11. You lost. Horribly. You couldn't back up your claims and you couldn't refute my claims. Just look at the crap you're trying to pull now. You made a claim. You were asked to back it up. You start playing games and asking other questions while running like a scared girl from answering the question asked of you. And you claim WE lack sincerity? That's a good one! If you are so sincere, why do you continue to run from the questions you've been asked?
Another claim you can't back up and is pure horse(*)(*)(*)(*). Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). That is your opinion, and you are welcome to it, but it is a far cry from the truth. If our explanation are so "loose fitting" and "bizarre", why is it you can't refute them, yet we can completely trash truther explanations? Could it be because we have the evidence to back up our claims while truthers have absolutely zero? Or do you have some other excuse for your wildly inaccurate claim? I said it as well. I backed it up. You failed to respond to both the initial question asked of you or my response to you. Once again your lies are exposed as pure truther propaganda based on fantasy and not the truth. Yeah, we hear that all the time from truthers who are not sincere. The last one was RWAF. He claimed he was going to be sincere, yet once the questions got into areas he knew he was going to lose, he went right back to his usual tactics. Why would you be any different IF one was to actually believe you were telling the truth about our supposed lack of sincerity? You joined in this discussion and promptly ran from answering questions while making new demands of your own. How honest and sincere is that tactic again? Oh right. Not very.
You'd get sincere answers if you stopped asking such bull**** questions... \ Dozens if not thousands HAD to be involved,it's only common sense after all
I lost horribly because you said I lost horribly? lol.... what is disgusting is people like you exploiting the deaths as leverage to further defend the OCT. The claim I made is the OP gave no explanation why it would take "thousands" of people. That claim is backed up by the fact the OP does not even begin to explain the claim. If it does, then quote from the OP where that is explained.
Rather than poll that entire list of approximately 55,000 people involved in the response and investigation of 9/11, wouldn't be easier to find the one's on that list who've publicly claimed 9/11 was an Inside Job? It might be a much shorter list to sift through.
You lost horribly because I could refute every one of your points and you failed to refute mine. You can't even come up with a single piece of evidence that proves whatever bull(*)(*)(*)(*) you believe this week. Awwww. Look at that. SS is trying to pretend he actually cares about the people who died even though he is more than willing to lie about what happened to them. Think anyone is buying your insincerity SS? I'm not. OK, so you were whining about the OP not explaining himself. So I and others, gave you an explanation. You didn't like that. So we asked you to clarify your position. After all, if you're going to (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) about our position, you should be able to back up the alternate position, right? So I am asking you again. Please let us know which of the myriad of truther theories do you believe and why would it not take thousands to plan, prep, execute and cover up? The ONLY theory I've ever seen that did not require the active knowledge of thousands is the theory that 19 hijackers took over four planes and flew them into 3 buildings. So. Defend your position. I've explained and then defended my position. You failed to refute it unless you are going to pretend insults and running away is a refutation.
First, explain to us which of the myriad of 9/11 theories out there we are talking about because the different theories involve different groups of people. Here is the short list: Towers OTC: Planes flew into the towers. The fires brought the towers down. 1 Planes flew into the towers, but explosives were planted everywhere to bring the towers down 2 Planes flew into the towers, but thermite was planted everywhere to bring the towers down 3 Planes flew into the towers, but a small nuclear bomb brought the towers down 4 No planes flew into the towers. It was explosives that brought the towers down. 5 No planes flew into the towers. The towers were dustified by energy weapons. 6 No planes flew into the towers, but a small nuclear bomb brought the towers down WTC 7 OTC: WTC 7 was brought down because fires made a key column collapse which caused a cascade failure resulting in the collapse of WTC 7 1 WTC 7 was brought down by classic controlled demolition 2 WTC 7 was brought down by thermite 3 WTC 7 was brought down by an energy weapon Pentagon OTC: Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon 1 A plane flew over the Pentagon with explosives timed to go off as the plane went over 2 Two planes flew to the pentagon. One crashed, the other flew over 3 A global hawk flew into the Pentagon 4 A missile hit the Pentagon Shanksville OTC: Flight 93 crashed in Shanksville due to the passengers trying to retake the plane 1 Flight 93 didn't crash in shanksville but landed elsewhere. The crash scene was all staged 2 Flight 93 was shot down. The crash scene was staged. Pick the numbers of what you think happened that didn't require thousands to be involved. I will then show you how it had to be well over a thousand people involved.
Zero is a much, much smaller list than 55,000. SS knows this, but wants to play games. If any of the people had come forward, we would be discussing them, not watching some truther try to pretend he needs the specific confirmation of 55,000 individuals.
Their fingerprints are all over everything. You'd have to be a blind fool NOT to connect the dots and piece this puzzle together. It is THAT clear. Dr Alan Sabrosky; Treason, Betrayal and Deceit: 9/11 and Beyond. [video=youtube;cPgs-82XjGY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPgs-82XjGY[/video] The most prominent war mongering neocons and the founders of "The Project for a New American Century" were Jews: Paul Wolfowitz.. Richard Perle.. Elliot Abrams.. Bill Kristol.. Robert Kagan.. David Wurmser.. Scooter Libby.. Norman Podhoretz.. John Podhoretz.. James Schlesinger.. Dov Zakheim.. Douglas Feith.. Marc Grossman.. Michael Ledeen.. Charles Krauthammer.. Stephen Bryen.. David Frum...These were the Iraq war planners and the "bomb the Mid East into democracy" advocates. All hold dual citizenship with Israel.
No need to attack the messenger, falsely label him, just man up to it and admit you are at a loss. "Beware" of those who attack the messenger, who apply false motives, (assuming to know the motives of others) and using those assumptions to discredit the messenger, since they fail to rebut the message. Now go ahead and attack in predictable fashion.
There is no need to attack you personally. You've already proven your worth in your posts. As for that (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up retard Sabrosky, he is an anti-semitic piece of (*)(*)(*)(*) that the world would be better off without. If you wish anyone here to actually believe the tripe you post, how about you start with one piece of real evidence. Not coincidence. Not opinion. Evidence. To date not a single truther has been able to produce a single piece of real evidence. I doubt very much you will be the first.
