Israel threatened to take down world in nuclear Armageddon

LOL, neither Russia nor China are interested in Israel's disappearance, both benefit from constant tensions in the region and both realize that they will lose their influence and might well be next if the perpetually enraged muslim street has no Israel to occupy themselves with.

Oh, and who cares about the world's opinion, it changes with every generation anyway. The world's opinion was in Israel's favor in 1967 when the arab world was about to wipe Israel off the map, yet not a signle f&cking country came to Israel's help, not even the US. Now a bunch of ignorant morons in the UK and Scandinavia with zero understanding of history and the reality on the ground think Israel is a bully or whatever. Who gives a shiite? They (the morons) don't call the shots and never will (because they are morons). Israel's economy, export, import, international recognition etc have been steadily growing, Israel's enemies are in dire straits despite the "world's sympathy". As an Arab saying goes - the dogs bark but the caravan keeps going.

 

do you have a link that is their plan or is it just this anti-semitic blather?

 

God sure did chose an annoying bunch to be his chosen people.

 

Presstv is the Iranian mouthpiece.

I find it funny Iran claim Israel is the bad guy, when Iran is already in Syria. Iranians are the imperialists and want the world destroyed, not the Israelis.

http://www.rt.com/news/syria-iran-cooperation-protests-969/

And look a non-jewish source! I know some of you just love using RT.com as your source.

 

lol......

 

But it is okay. Here we look at them and before criticizing or condemning them we're reminded that we all fall short of His glory. None of us are perfect and we're all sinners. Israelis remind us that daily and instead of condemning them it gives us an opportunity to reflect on our own selves and determine where our wicked ways are more apparent.

 

Yep.

John 8:7 If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.

 

While I did not provide that footate, I BET you did not watch it, did you?

And therefore, on that basis, you are totally unable to debate any of the content - at all.

I see no reason why the member should indulge you, let alone respect you, if you cannot pay him the respect of at least watching what he offered, thinking about it, then debating the content of it.

What is it about this society that they squeal 'link' to everything, as a default response.

It is overdone.

If every single sentence had to be backed up with a 'link', then we would have a rather odd looking set of posts!

Albeit I do try to evidence any claims with information, always.

However, better than parroting 'link' all the time, might be to actually ..do some research YOURSELF.

Is that not the best way to go about it?

By all means read the information, then go research it, to your satisfaction.

Saves you then rejecting 'links' you neither like, nor wish to watch.

Jack

 

Yes.

And American TV is dumbed down and a Zionist mouthpiece.

Next?

 

Yeah.

And whining and ungrateful, and greedy, and guilty of murder, and a love of money.

Are those sins or anything?

 

*Sigh*

RT were not 'the source'.

This is the 'source'.

According to the central Chinese daily Renmin Ribao, the Iranian special task troops are due to be deployed in Syria’s key provinces.


Big reader of Renmin Ribao, are ya?

 

why would RT pick it up if it has no merit?

 

Most normal human beings do not act as they do.

I have no blood on my hands, I have not killed.

I don't keep people that used to own this house in a dark cellar, then whine terrorist, when they resist me.

You are not like them either.

 

It's the way media works, I'm afraid.

All media.

Some more than others.

It's complex and long to explain, however, if you are really interested, get a book called Flat Earth News.

Really good read, but of course, read that with an open mind as well.

 

10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. James 2:10

The blood of Christ.

 

Aye, and who plotted, insisted on, and made it possible for the torture and murder of Jesus?

We're not even allowed(sic) to say that anymore.

Instead we must factor that out, and 'blame the Romans'.

Bogus imo.

 

I'll say it, Jews did.

But Christ came to die.

 

Then why has the Holy See, after all this time, changed his position?


*I wonder*...



Pope finds Jews not to blame for death of Jesus


Pope concludes those responsible for the crucifixion were the 'Temple aristocracy' and supporters of the rebel Barabbas


The pope has written a detailed and personal repudiation of the idea that the Jews were collectively responsible for the death of Jesus.

In a book to be published next week, he concludes that those responsible for the crucifixion were the "Temple aristocracy" and supporters of the rebel Barabbas.

Dismissing the centuries-old interpretation of St John's assertion that it was "the Jews" who demanded Barabbas's release and Jesus's execution, the pontiff asks: "How could the whole people have been present at this moment to clamour for Jesus's death?"

The notion of collective Jewish guilt, which bedevilled relations between the two faiths, was disowned by the Roman Catholic church at the second Vatican council in 1965. But this is thought to be the first time a pope has carried out such a detailed, theological demolition of the concept.

It is particularly significant coming from the pen of a German-born pontiff who has more than once been at the eye of a storm in Jewish-Catholic relations. Elan Steinberg, vice-president of the American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors and their Descendants, told Reuters: "This is a major step forward. This is a personal repudiation of the theological underpinning of centuries of antisemitism."(yawn)

Benedict's analysis featured in extracts from the second volume of his work, Jesus of Nazareth, released on Wednesday by the Vatican's publishers. The first volume was published four years ago. The second, due out on 10 March, deals with Jesus's later life, death and the resurrection that is central to Christian belief.

The pope also focuses on another phrase from the gospel often used against Jews. St Matthew describes the crowd as saying: "His blood be on us and on our children."

Benedict writes that Jesus's death was not about punishment, but salvation. The blood he shed "does not cry out for vengeance and punishment, it brings reconciliation," he writes.

The pope, who as a young boy belonged to the Hitler Youth, attracted a barrage of criticism two years ago he when he lifted the excommunication of an ultra-traditionalist British bishop, Richard Williamson, who had cast doubt on the extent of the Holocaust.

Later the same year he was criticised for furthering the advance towards sainthood of Pius XII. The Vatican lauds the wartime pope for working quietly to save Jewish lives, but his critics argue he should have openly denounced the Nazis' genocide.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/02/pope-jews-jesus-death-crucifixion

 

I don't know you'd have to ask Catholics. Basically Jews have been riding the sympathy wave from the holocaust but it's running out of steam. lol

 

I think so, and I think it had something to do with how Jews were conducting themselves in Europe and Russia around that time.

 

They're just people who treat myth as real history, nothing more. It's pretty sad to think of Jews being killed over a sun-based religious story.

 

If only Hitler actually did what he is accused of, we would not have the Jew problem of today.
Below are the 2 sicknesses that won WWII and together form The New World Order that has been sickening the World, Society and Family:
1. International Jew Communists - Eastern Europe & China
2. International Jew Bankers - Western Europe & America
No matter time in history, location on Earth or people involved the Jew is a sickness to any Nation.
Through the Jews mouth, the Devil speaks to us.

 

Well, whatever Hitler did or did not do, let's not forget that the idea that total Jewish extermination was the primary goal, was false, imo.

If total extermination of all Jews were indeed the goal, you would have to ask why World Zionist movements were doing deals with Hitler, one of which allowed for well off Zionist Jews to leave Europe, and move to Palestine? I mean, either these Zionists were somehow sure Germany would lose, because if they knew that they would win, and the idea of Germany exterminating all Jews were true, then do they believe that Hitler would have just sort of forgotten about them?

I would also ask people to do some reading on the split in Jewry at the time. Between the majority, and an atheist minority, who wished to redefine Jews along national identity lines. Having greater number is no assurance of a win, esp when the opponent is well organised, and well funded. I believe that most of the Jews that died during WW2, were left to die on purpose. I would further assert that the vast bulk were lower class, non Zionist Jews. The evidence behind them being left to die on purpose, comes from the lobbying that Zionists did to stop Jewish immigration out of Europe, even although they knew that things were not good at all.

However, as the founder of Zionism, and the stain on Judaism, Theodore Hertzl admits, in his own diary, Zionism needed Jews to suffer, they wanted to use it, for their political ends.

I cannot think of a more wicked thing than that.

One in the US today would believe that Americans had always been this obsessed with Israel, and all things Jewish.

They would be wrong. Dead wrong. Indeed, it was only in the late 60's, when Jewish immigrants moved into the American middle class, that you slowly began to see this shift.

It was only in the late 60's, that American society paid real heed to the 'holocaust', so either news travels slow, or previous to that, it just was not news to them. There are even US newspapers which show that American knew full well what was meant to be going on in Europe, incidents would be reported, in mainstream newspapers, there just was not that much attention paid to Jewish suffering in Europe. Simple as that.

Even the term 'holocaust' didn't come into common use until 1978!

If that seems incredible to you, I invite you to go look, while it was used at times in the 60's, by academics, it was not until 1980 that the phrase was coined, and the word association made in our head, as it is today.

The inspiration for the term in popular use? A 1978 US mini series. Of all things.

If WW2 should have taught Jews anything, it was never be the oppessor, if the allegations against the Reich are true.

Never become akin to what you hated, apparently.

But history has now shown us that they did not learn this lesson.

The opposite.

They have become what they always said they most hated.

Naturally they will deny this, but then you would expect them to.

The same Zionists who, as far back as the 1920's were saying that for their aims to be met, Jews would NEED to suffer, are benefitting from the dead, even now.

The Holocaust indusrty is GROSS and CRASS.

Seriously, go be a tourist at A'witz, and it's set up like some ghoul theme park. You can buy beer.

Where does that money go, because I have evidence to say that v little money ever did make it's way to those that were interned.

Or one could go read what I put up about the Simon Weisenthal Centre, and tell me if they think it sounds tasteful and goodly, or merely a money making racket.

Or they could do a little reading on Nobel Peace Prize winner, Ellie Wiesel, on another thread, and ask...are you yet another scam artist?

Because as I showed on that thread, he is not the first that was a proven fraud.

Then we have the Holocaust museum (or one of it's MacDonald's like franchises), charging people big bucks, to get in and weep at some soap.

Many shed tears later, the soap was tested.....and found to be soap. Not 'Jew fat', as the museum tried to pass it off as.

I am sure that one was just a blip.

Then we had the lampshades the furniture that were made from Jews, and it was sworn as true.

This was false also.

Then we had the Nazi Shrunken Heads, like they are now into some sort of African voodoo, right?

These things only damage credibility of other incredible claims, and that doesn't mean to say nothing is true, or that no one died, or that terrible things did not happen. Notwithstanding, if evidence of claims were put forward, and a large number were proven false, or the witnesses liars, then naturally people are going to then call into question the rest of the evidence, or other claims, of other rich writers and speakers, who claim things.

They would do that in ALL other situtations.

Jack

 

Just because some Jews talked bad about Zionism, doesn't mean Zionism is evil. It just means people have different opinions.

I can post quotes of Muslims condemning Islamism, but does that make Islamism evil? No, it just means people have different opinions.

 

What is 'Islamism'?