Do you approve sex before marriage?

I probably would with Thor and Loki...does that count?

 

Sex before marriage is risky because everyone who has sex for the first time does not use condoms or the pill because of the anxiety involved with losing ones virginity.

So a benefit of waiting till marriage is that their is more time to plan how their first time will be.

 

Yes =P

 

For what?

 

Do you just have threesomes and all that at home?

 

Generally, yeah.

 

Apologies for the language, people...



So, we have a couple of posters saying that if you have sex before you are married, you are a slut. Okay, lets go with that.

How many of you have parents who had sex before they were married? Better call your mum a slut.
How many of you have grandparents who had sex before they were married? Better call up grandma and call her a slut.

Come to think of it, my nana was 8 weeks pregnant with my auntie when she got married. Better call up nan and break the devastating news to her that she's a slut.

Jesus, I swear, do people even think about what they are saying?

 

Thinking? Nope. My 2000 year old Jewish zombie and a bunch of parchment from doped up old men in the desert told me that was bad.



(Disclaimer: No attempted insult to the non-stupid Christians out there. You guys are cool.)

 

My grandmother was a whore and she bought enough land for us her grandchildren to have property.
We all loved our grandmother and not only because of the real estate , she was a magnificent person.

 

Well obviously I don't want to take away civil liberties from people, so that answers the question for this poll right there.

However, it's tempting to just outlaw sex before marriage because of all the nasty, superficial tramps with low intelligence getting pregnant and causing their families, taxpayers, and the labor market a (*)(*)(*)(*)load of problems.

 

The shame of the mother is passed onto the children.

The thing here is, though, pride is a male tradition not a female tradition. Women have a tenuous relationship with pride and dignity. A woman without pride or dignity, is common. That's why she's a slut. Since men cannot be sluts, or virgins, we don't have to worry as much about sexual shaming. A man's sexual shame appears in SIN, or, sex for pleasure instead of sex for procreation. If a man cannot repress his sexual urges, then he is to blame, guilty, and may or may not feel shame in front of GOD his maker, for his lustful ways. We do not hold women to this same standard. A woman who is promiscuous, is not held to the same social expectations as men, because women give birth to children.

I'm sure many here are born from "sluts". My point is simple.

Would you prefer your mother to be a prostitute working the street, a slut who has no pride in herself, or a GOOD CHRISTIAN WOMAN who waited until her wedding night in the GOD ORDAINED CHURCH, under the supervision of the families of the husband and wife, consummated the wedding on their honeymoon night, and was procreated purely in the fashion of GOD???

It's obvious. EVERYBODY IN THE ENTIRE WORLD, wants to be born from a virgin, not a whore. If you want to be born from a whore, then, that just shows you infected with liberalism and feminism you are. It shows you perverted and zionistic you are. It shows how much you hate men, and hate God, and hate Christ. It shows all of this immediately. You have no standards. You have no pride. You are closer to an animal. You operate on pure instinct.

 

Not even. The solar hero never to my memory went on about marriage like that. It was only the other opinionated scribes who came up with all sorts of rules.

Maybe the guys who voted on the canon should have left out all of the epistles and junk, and just left the gospels? Might have saved a lot of people a lot of trouble later

 

Not every woman who isn't a "GOOD CHRISTIAN" and doesn't wait for the honeymoon to begin her sex life is automatically promiscuous and "a slut who has no pride in herself." You create a false dichotomy.

 

So if a young girl loses her virginity, is never married, then how is her behavior not promiscuous?

What prevents the man from abandoning her or pimping her???? What prevents the man from taking advantage of her promiscuity?

 

Why the obsession over virginity? If a girl wants to lose it and become sexually active, that's her choice. Now, how is this not promiscuous, you ask. Well,

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/promiscuous?s=t

1. characterized by or involving indiscriminate mingling or association, especially having sexual relations with a number of partners on a casual basis.

My source says that promiscuity takes more than having sex with someone outside of marriage, that it has more to do with casual sex.

Further, ... pimping her?? You think as soon as a man and woman are sexually active together, he can just do as he pleases with her like that? She has no power without a wedding band? A wedding band will somehow change this? This doesn't make sense to me. People can mistreat each other, including sexually, with or without a wedding band.

 

No, children cannot make "choices". That's why they're children and not adults. Young girls are sought after, by lecherous men, because they are less able to defend themselves from the lies of men. Young girls, virgins, are weaker to temptation. They are tricked into it. And today, we have an entire Zio-liberfascist culture, that ACTIVELY PROMOTES the sexualization of our children. I'd call this criminal. Teaching that 7 year old boys are "homosexuals", that is criminal to me. Many will disagree but.....whatever. Teaching young girls in middle school that "sex with a condom" is ACCEPTABLE?? That is also criminal, in my book.

You see......the state cannot protect our children from zionism. It cannot protect their chastity and virtue from the FOREIGN INFLUENCES which seek to pervert and pimp them.

Sex is money...don't you know? And who are the money makers, the pimps of our society??? Who are the pornography lords???? ASK SIMPLE QUESTIONS.

Who is the easily identifiable force, which promotes their liberal agenda "promiscuous sex is OKAY", "slutwalks", "feminism". Who led the feminist movements? Who ACTIVELY desires to pervert the young elements, the children, of our nation???????????

Is it.....people like me??? Or are people like me, TRUE CHRISTIANS, the PROTECTORS of our nation? Who has our nation's best interests in mind....me, or you???

No.........a young Christian girl has POWER to make CHOICES by KNOWING the differences, and by having WISDOM to see men as they are, to see GOOD men or EVIL men.

And our young girls of our nation, Christian girls, need this wisdom, to know the difference. They need the power to see through the lies of young boys and men, who actually do NOT have their best interests in mind, and seek SIN. Too many young men are SINNERS, and have no foresight. They are closer to animals, run on instinct, are EVIL as far as the term goes. They don't know what they do. They don't think about their actions. They just "want to ****". And that's all the thought that goes through their heads.

Young Christian girls ought to be PROTECTED from these types of men. These types of men ought to be excluded, and they are. Sluttish girls, Liberals, show society and expose which men are good or evil. Sluttish women are the buffer zone, before you get to the GOOD and VALUABLE girls. They're like the "cannon fodder" in war. But, this is a SPIRITUAL war. And we don't want EVIL men to get to the GOOD girls. This is why Christianity, Christ, and GOD, ALL PROTECT the chastity, sanctity, and virtue of young women.

And this is done, sometimes, much better than mortal men and fathers can do.....because men are fallible. God is not.

 

Actually, I really don't care. I was born of a good Christian virgin, but it wouldn't matter to me if I was born of a whore.

Well, I don't know about all THAT. I am definitely a manwhore though, and proud of it

 

Indeed! I much prefer the pagan systems. Sex is not only accepted and encouraged, it's a holy, sacred rite

 

I don't believe in anything supernatural etc. but I'd have to say that although two consenting adults absolutely and obviously have the civil right to have sex for any reason or no reason at all, young teens/12-year-olds getting pregnant is a serious problem related to a promiscuous society.

So are STD's.

 

The bigger issue is whether my wife approves of sex DURING marriage.

 

No disagreement there. I have the easiest solution, but conservatives will start another Civil War before they let it pass.

 

Ideally.....No.

2 never active virgins dont bring in the gamut of STD's (such as genital herpes, undetected AIDS, etc.) into the bedroom and start out together at square 1. Also I would think that sexual perversions are less likely, and no jealousy would arise from previous sexual relationships or comparisons from the past.

Plus, unless there are medical problems (or emotional ones), 2 ppl who love each other can find a way to mutally sexually satisfy each other..just takes a little time & patience! But as it is written, "Love is patient.."

 

Someone called for me?

 

No argument there on my part, though I think we can agree that bible-thumping won't solve the problem. Just ask the Palins

 

Lol! XD