A new low for Republicans, they block "stellar" judge solely to be partisan

some republicans politicians do remind me of the rich kid who takes his ball home cause he can't get his way

republicans have been putting party above country for the last couple years now, it's getting old


.

 

Please point out your post condeming the Democrats for blocking Robert Bork.

TIA.

 

As I previously posted:


Hmmmm...who'd they learn that trick from...?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senate Democrats Block 3 More Bush Judicial Nominees

"...The votes against Michigan jurists Henry W. Saad, Richard A. Griffin and David W. McKeague for the Cincinnati-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit brought to 10 the total of Bush appellate court nominees whom Democrats have filibustered."


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Jul22.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Looks like the "new low for Republicans", is just doing the SAME THING that DEMOCRATS DO.....hypocrite much?


Spare us the self righteous , hypocritical BULLCRAP, willya?

 

We should no longer have to put up with these Liberal parasites in the U.S.A. After November, we can flush the collective lot of them.

It's time to get the country back. That means reforming education, firing masses of bureaucrats, and putting in constitutional judges.

The Liberals have done enough damage... it's time to get rid of them.

 

Who? *goes to look*

Oh. Ok. Wait, so how is a hotly contested debate by both sides, with opposition to him from groups and the like based on their opinion of his abilities, the same as a judge who both sides like but can't put in because of a separate issue that has nothing to do with his abilities?

 

I don't even trust the judges nominated by Republican presidents to do the right thing once they get their lifetime appointment.

Witness the Quisling John Roberts.

And that goes double for judges appointed by Obama.

 

The same judge republicans called "stellar", "awkward not to vote for one of the best nominees"? Really? Thats so counter intuitive i'd have to call it stupid if it wasnt so obviously partisan. Do republicans ever do anything?

 

No judge nominated by Obama can be stellar.

 

Republicans thought he was

 

Some Republicans do, others do not.

 

Maybe they'll let Inhofe drive the Sooner Schooner next fall, but seriously...

...its got to be a bit embarrassing to go on record acknowledging your a partisan hack. He at least could of lied to our faces

 

You lost me.

I don't know who you are talking about or what you're trying to say.

 

Americans dont like commies.

 

OK...Inhofe states the judge is one of the best candidates, then votes against him acknowledging it was for partisan reasons. If Inhofe was smart, he would of just made up some reason publicly so he doesnt look partisan. It takes an amazing amount of arrogance to tell us he doesnt have any guts. He liked the player, but since he had the wrong color jersey on, he isnt gonna play

 

OK...Inhofe states the judge is one of the best candidates, then votes against him acknowledging it was for partisan reasons. If Inhofe was smart, he would of just made up some reason publicly so he doesnt look partisan. It takes an amazing amount of arrogance to tell us he doesnt have any guts. He liked the player, but since he had the wrong color jersey on, he isnt gonna play

 

I hope our senators are not cheering for players on the other team.

My side is often pretty inept at parliamentary infighting where libs and Democrats excel.

So Republican senators do sometimes forget that the idea is to win for their side not get along with the enemy.