Can there be a party of candidates that do not discriminate? I'd vote for them!

Romney publicans - in general blame everything on democrats, muslims and the media
Obamacrats - in general want more money from the rich, blame republicans for everything
Ron Paul libertarians - despite sounding completely honest, an anti war grandpa who voted for Afghanistan war, and on his behalf I got flooded by emails about money bombs and the need to donate for a year.
Tea partiers - led by neocons such as ex fed Herman Cain, and other war mongers such as Sarah Bachmann, Palin and other scum who hate muslims (see republicans)
OWS - I think originaly it was started as a movement to end government bail outs, then came out with a list of demands from the government for other peoples money.

And so on.

Are any of you here individuals? meaning you can look at yourself as a starting point for the movement that is right? meaning allow the possibility that change must start with you? I'm not talking about personal change, I am talking about taking our country back. in order to do so we need to be able to unite, and we can not unite unless a movement does not discriminate but instead focuses on the core of corruption, such as ending money in political campaigns and keeping politicians from high security - YES they are more vulnerable to assasination like that, but so are soldiers in Middle east.

thoughts? a nice country would be nicer to live in, but I can not do it alone.

 

Ok, the only problem I see with any of the parties or people is pride. Every single stereotypical group or person you mentioned has it forced into their head that there is only one way or the highway, they believe they were elected on that base so that's how they vote. They only do what they people want them to do. So if they stray from that path their ego or pride will be hurt because they may lose the next election, which of course they don't want. Taking the money out is not going to happen, the only way to solve that is to educate the people and get them involved, but you wont see a change in opinion for a generation or so, because they are having their minds force fed from a young age. I'm a Southern Republican from Texas, I consider my self die hard, and in truth I'm not. I am a strong believer in 2nd Amendment rights, keeping the government small, and not telling me what to do. I'm not against abortion, I say let people make their own choices because in the end they are the ones that have to live with it. A person whether black, white, brown, tan, is still a person only to be judged by their actions. If you have a different religious belief than me, that's cool ill let you do your thing while I do mine. If you want a party that doesn't discriminate, you wont find one. My suggestion is to join the party that has similar values to yours, and be the better person and set a better example for the next generation.

 

The term is "Pipe dreams". When you deal with more than one person (yourself) there will be a differing opinion and attitude. Utopia is what Russia wanted...look at them now. I'll stick with the good old American system...of course it will be miles better once the Marxist is gone from DC.

 

Really???????????

[video=youtube;F9SOVzMV2bc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9SOVzMV2bc[/video]

[video=youtube;x1dSPrb5w_k]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1dSPrb5w_k[/video]

 

You mean like demo republic rat pipe dreams or weed smokers pipe dreams?

 

discrimination means to de-criminate. In other words, it means to choose virtue over the insanity of sin.

That has been the problem, Americans have not discriminated for over 100 years.

 

Peoplevsmedia: Ok, why did Bush change his mind, because the nation came together and it was decided to take action in Afghanistan and then Iraq. Everyone felt anger towards the people that attacked us and he responded appropriately. Its not popular now because the anger has subsided and we felt justice was done. Well not to repeat what happened in Afghanistan a second time "by walking out once the USSR were beaten", they are trying to put it back together and rebuild it so they don't fall back into the hole of despair which now seems impossible due to the fact they have been killing each other for thousands of years, and they are just going to keep doing it regardless. If you leave a nation destroyed, the strong will take over and most of the time they are what we conciser "Evil". As for Obama, I don't like any of his policy and never believed he would do what he said, so no comment on that.

 

Peoplevsmedia,

How much everclear is in the vodka you drink when you make your daily posts?

I love 'em, and want what you're drinking.