Which country should the US invade or attack next?

Discussion in 'Opinion POLLS' started by Marshal, Aug 29, 2012.

?

Which country should the US attack or invade next?

  1. Country in South America

    1 vote(s)
    6.7%
  2. Country in Asia

    1 vote(s)
    6.7%
  3. Country in Africa

    2 vote(s)
    13.3%
  4. Country in Europe/Middle East

    4 vote(s)
    26.7%
  5. All of the above

    11 vote(s)
    73.3%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Marshal

    Marshal New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are you an American?

    Do you have an opinion?
     
  2. SpaceCricket79

    SpaceCricket79 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2012
    Messages:
    12,934
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your country
     
  3. OJLeb

    OJLeb New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,831
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Might as well just invade the whole world.... But if I had to choose, they should invade "Israel".

    The day that happens... Lol
     
  4. SpaceCricket79

    SpaceCricket79 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2012
    Messages:
    12,934
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nah they should invade your country and teach some American military ingenuity to your Canadian soldiers - all 13 of them.
     
  5. lizarddust

    lizarddust Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,350
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Bizarre thread!
     
  6. custer

    custer New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    1,927
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ya (*)(*)(*)(*) Canada let's burn that place to the ground!
     
  7. skeptic-f

    skeptic-f New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Messages:
    7,929
    Likes Received:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Northern Mali. Al-Qaeda is currently in the process of carving out an enclave there but they haven't finished establishing themselves. A fairly small force with good air support and Mali government troops to pick up the pieces would solve this growing problem pretty quickly (and there is no nearby Pakistan to give the Islamo-fascists shelter either).
     
  8. protectionist

    protectionist Banned

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    13,898
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    0
    MEXICO !

    Absolutely Mexico.
     
  9. Crawdadr

    Crawdadr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    7,293
    Likes Received:
    1,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    why attack any country? There needs to be a very good reason. Until there is one then none.
     
  10. Iolo

    Iolo Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    8,759
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Invade San Marino: it is safer.
     
  11. protectionist

    protectionist Banned

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    13,898
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    0
    While you and million sof other Americans have your heads up your butts, Mexico has been calmly pillaging the USa for hundreds of Billion$$$$$, year after year, decade after decade. Haven't noticed, huh ? 14th amendment sound familiar ? Anchor babies ? Lifetime of benefit$$$$$$$ ? And remittances$$$$. Haven't taken notice of that ? $25 Billion/year out of the US economy and straight into Mexico's.

    So what is it ? You only notice imperialism when it's done the old way. With bombs, guns and swords ? That's your only definition of invasion ? Never occured to you that poor people are the new "troops", huh ? $25 Billion/year. The Vikings would be envious.
     
  12. Mr. Swedish Guy

    Mr. Swedish Guy New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2012
    Messages:
    11,688
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I picked all options. They might as well go loose on the world and feck upp every just for the sake of it. russia, china, north korea, cuba, whole middleast and north africa 'cept israel.. wouldn't mind too much. other than that is would be sort of pointless and cost a lot of money.
     
  13. Paris

    Paris Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    4,394
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Country in Europe/Middle East (Israel). We are your best enemies. Let's get done with it.
     
  14. Mayerling

    Mayerling Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,452
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    48
    How about none of the above?
     
  15. Bain

    Bain New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    947
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I was thinking Canada, I have no idea why.

    In all seriousness we are into killing brown people, so to keep the trend going, I say Pakistan. Why? It has a "stan" in the name so they are diffidently terrorist.
     
  16. Marshal

    Marshal New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0

    None of the above is not a valid option, because there is no country "none" in the region "above". Try again, please.
     
  17. Marshal

    Marshal New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Canada is not a valid answer, because it is already part of the United States.

     
  18. sparky2

    sparky2 Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2012
    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Attack, and cripple?
    Iran.

    Invade?
    None.
    Invasion and occupation is a losing proposition.
    And with the possible exception of Germany and South Korea, the US hasn't been proven to be very good at it.


    .
     
  19. gr8dane

    gr8dane New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As a Texan I've gotten pretty good at occupying former Mexican territory.

    But seriously, poor people and Persians?
    Has the MIC run out of ideas?
     
  20. Brewskier

    Brewskier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2011
    Messages:
    48,910
    Likes Received:
    9,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Bad idea. What do they have down there that would enrich our nation? Not to mention, if we conquered Mexico, everyone in Mexico would become a US citizen, eligible for welfare and jobs. Don't we have enough Mexicans already?

    We'll still have an anchor baby problem. They'll just be coming up from Central and South America now.
     
  21. mikezila

    mikezila New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    23,299
    Likes Received:
    250
    Trophy Points:
    0
    we should invade the US. after the economies of the countries we protect, and keep in check, collapse, we will rule the world. :winner:
     
  22. Marshal

    Marshal New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Historically... That is actually not a bad idea.

    The economies of the countries the US invades tend to do very well a few years after the Americans leave.

    The Pentagon could set up an interim government and put the US on a path to democracy.

     
  23. savage-republican

    savage-republican Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Messages:
    2,134
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
  24. skeptic-f

    skeptic-f New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Messages:
    7,929
    Likes Received:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's worse than that. By our definition 9 out of 10 Canadians are liberals - even most of their "conservatives" believe in universal health care and social security. And then there is Quebec - imagine several million Canadian liberals crossed with Frenchmen! The last thing we want to do is bring Canada into our possession. We own them anyway - let's keep them at arm's length.
     
  25. protectionist

    protectionist Banned

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    13,898
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    0
    See post # 11. The reasons you state for not invading Mexico are exactly the reasons I state FOR invading them. They are currently invading us (didn't you know ?), and have been doing so for decades. By the anchor baby system, they drain more money out of our state and local treasuries than American citizens do. By remittances, they are pillaging us for $25 Billion/year (out of our economy, re-inserted into theirs). The list of the harms of their immigration here is a long one.

    We need to invade Mexico to stop them from continuing to invade us. Everyone in Mexico would not be a US citizen just because we conquer them and force them to meet our demands. We did that to Germany and Japan. All their citizens did not become US citizens. We just made them leave us alone, that's all. Mexico is a basket case. It is a country in disarray that badly needs to be brought under sensible control. Right now, we are the worst victims of Mexico's wildness. As long as we sit idle and let it happen we'll continue to have all THESE PROBLEMS :

    Harms of Immigration

    1. Americans lose jobs. (especially Whites due to affirmative action).

    2. Wage reduction.

    3. Tax $ lost (due to off books work + lower wages paid).

    4. Remittance $$$ lost. ($40 Billion year).

    5. Tax $$ lost to immigrants on welfare.

    6. Increased crime.

    7. Increased traffic congestion.

    8. Increased pollution.

    9. Overcrowding in hospital ERs.

    10. Overcrowding in recreational facilities.

    11. Overcrowding in government offices.

    12. Overcrowding in schools.

    13. Decrease in funds available for entitlements.

    14. Cultural erosion.

    As for the too many Mexicans we have now, if we forced Mexico to stop their 21st century style of imperialism they are enacting upon us, and we got control over our finances (another subject), we could increase the number of ICE agents, CBP officers, build the fence, create immigration courts and jails, jail illegal employers, and force Mexico to take back all the illegal aliens they sent here, infecting our country.

    http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...xican-invasion-united-states-1950-2012-a.html
     

Share This Page