Nah. That would be the clueless neo-cons who I told a year ago that they were going to lose but were invested in denial an ignorance so deeply that they had no clue that they were going to be obliterated and dominated by me on election night. Even though I told them repeatedly that they were going to lose. The superior race won on election night. Losers to the back of the bus for another 4 years.
I think you're correct. Westerners wouldn't be tolerated in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Mexico/S. America, if they migrated to those nations in numbers comparable to the migration from those nations to the West. I think it will be similar here and throughout Europe once (or if) whites become a small minority.
no u said the superior race won. with Obama being black, or half black, you must be talking about the african americans as the superior race then right? if not, who is the "superior race" you speak of?
If amnesty happens, it absolutley needs to come with reform to prevent this in the future, otherwise, this will be a never ending problem.
Black culture is at one and the same time completely American and completely alien. African America is a separate country in terms of consciousness.
it needs to come with many stipulations like no voting for 30 years and that goes with their kids even if born on US soil. they are not allowed to take in any kind of welfare benfits or food stamps and neither are their children able to get them. and they wont be eligible for any assistance such as Obamacare or anything for 30 years. and they must pay a higher tax rate than american citizens for 30 years to make up for all the (*)(*)(*)(*) illegals have cost us. lets see how much they would want amnesty then.
With this amnesty we are essentially saying we are an open borders country....come one, come all....we care nothing about preserving our culture and our way of life....and the world will be a sadder place for what this generation did to a once proud culture and nation....
Well, they tried it in 86, and we see what happened. It's a 'give an inch, take a mile scenario'. There will always be activist, and politicians who stand to benefit from such, who will continue pushing the bounds until there really isn't anywhere else to go with it.
Well amnesty makes one of our trading partners, Mexico, richer in its own economy. And that helps build both the American and Mexican economy, since illegal immigrants take money they make in America and send it back to mexico.
Yeah, that's why some serious reform needs to come with it. If amnesty was given to non felons, there would need to be borders and a much higher level of patrol. Of course giving amnesty without fixing the problem won't change anything.
No you see when illegal immigrants send money back to Mexico, the Mexican economy improves and they are able to pay more for products that American businesses could export there. So those businesses will get taxed higher, the more profits they make, and that could go to the countries welfare programs. It's all part of the circle of life.
Aren't you a Libertarian, or at least libertarianish? Libertarians believe in open borders. Everyone, anytime should have amnesty. Anyway, we tried that before. The 86 Simpson-Mazzoli bill was supposed to have amnesty and then securing the borders. So there won't be any "reform" with the next amnesty either. If you think there will be, then you don't understand the point of amnesty.
I think that is an excellent contribution to the debate with thoughtful insight and undeniable logic. Thank you so much for sharing your wisdom with us.
