Dr Wood's claim that 80% of the steel from the towers was turned to dust.

'Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura': Death Rays, 9/11 and Murders
@ 24:00 The John Hutchison Effect
@ 34:00 Dr. Judy Wood

Wow! over 33,000 views in four days!

 

Why does Judy meet with Jesse in a garage? Why did she murder her assistant?

 

I laughed my ass off when Jesse did the lizard shape-shifting episode. Nevertheless, NASA has a laser that can vaporize rock - it's on the Curiosity rover.

What's the going hypothesis of this lady again?

 

She's a nutcase, and the laser that can vaporize rock is light years different then what she is proposing. She is proposing a DEW hit the towers in front of everyone and evaporated or "dustified" the towers in front of our eyes.

 

Not only that,it also dustified the towers and left survivors in the stairwell....

 

Haha that's right, I forgot that it was selective on what it actually hits and what it doesn't. It also starts fires on certain floors of other buildings, basically it's the one stop shop.

 

thats how people stay alive when they are in the tattle tale business.

 

yah thats why they call it "directed"

 

This was very compelling. The dust cloud rising above the height of the building seems to be a bending of the rules of physics as we know them.

 

Given the qualifier at the end of that statement, I'm sure I know what the problem is.

Perhaps Boyle would be less compelled.

 

unless they nuked it

 

I know stupid truther, tin-foiler, telling her lies.......................

 

go right ahead and explain how the expansion of heated gasses and aerosols requires a bending of the laws of physics

 

it will come in the form of a mushroom cloud. ~ GW bush

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4Ubv6LrHGI

[video=youtube;Ay056s1TB_o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ay056s1TB_o[/video]

 

Show me the failing of any structure where the debris from the structure rises above the structures original height, and we can continue this conversation.

 

Bush never said that,and the cloud from the WTC was NOT 'pyroclastic'....only an idiot would claim that

 

​

There is a lot of deception, distraction, and diversion going on, both intentional and otherwise, leading people to climb on to popular "theories" or "band wagons". Truth is not established by popularity, although agenda-driven political campaigns are. So we need to establish a better way to sort through the information we find by improving our problem-solving skills.

There are various groups on the internet lead by nefarious figures such as Richard Gage and Jim Fetzer, each with their own set of beliefs and objectives, promoting how it was done, or who did it or why they did it. But none of them have taken the first step of an investigation which is to determine what it is that was done, that is, to first determine WHAT happened. Until they have done that, they are merely speculating or theorizing or hypothesizing or guessing. This is essentially assuming what happened and then proving the assumptions through biased observations (i.e. "cherry-picking" data). Promoting beliefs distracts away from determining WHAT happened. This is why the order of problem solving is so important. Remember, you must first determine WHAT happened BEFORE you can determine HOW it happened and independent of knowing how it happened.

Remember how a cover-up works. Get people to theorize and speculate about an imagined problem (i.e Mini-Neutron Bombs), then get them to argue opinions with others. Everyone will be arguing about opinions of speculations of theories of opinions of guesswork, and they'll just go round and round and round and get nowhere. It is amazingly easy to keep a cover up in place! The only way out of that vicious cycle is to deal with the facts and only the facts (empirical evidence).

If you read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?, you would know from the EVIDENCE that the Twin Towers turned to dust in mid-air never hitting the ground.

Bombs do not do that.
Mini-neutron bombs do not do that.
Thermite does not do that.
Thermate does not do that.
Nano-enhanced thermite does not do that.
Nano-thermite does not do that.
New-and-improved super-duper mini-micro-nano thermite does not do that.
Firecrackers do not do that.
Fire does not do that.
Nukes do not do that.
Megga nukes do not do that.
Milli-nukes do not do that.
Mini-nukes do not do that.
Nano-nukes cannot do that.
A wrecking ball cannot do that.
A slingshot cannot do that.
Missiles cannot do that.

We know this because we know those things above involve Kinetic Energy and we know that the "dustification" was done without Kinetic Energy. That is, dustification was not done with high heat nor with some other form of Kinetic Energy (wrecking ball, projectile, gravity collapse). The building was not cooked to death nor was it beaten to death. So Kinetic Energy Weapons (KEW) did not destroy the buildings. But we know that Energy was Directed somehow and controlled within fairly precise boundaries only destroying buildings with a WTC prefix to cause them to turn to dust in mid air. That is, some kind of (cold) Directed Energy Weapon (cDEW) had to have done this. (i.e. LENR) Energy was directed and manipulated within the material such that it came apart without involving high heat and without having something fly through the air and hit it (bullets, missile, bombs, wrecking ball, a giant hammer, many micro hammers...)

If this technology can manipulate energy to do something like this, it can also be manipulated to provide us with "free energy" (i.e. "off the grid"). Simply by looking at the cover of Dr. Wood's book you can realize there must be a technology that can do this. This is evidence that such technology does exist. This is evidence that a technology capable of providing "free energy" ("off the grid") exists. The whole world witnessed this which means the whole world can know that "free-energy technology" exists. This realization will change the world. This is probably the biggest reason why there is so much effort spent misrepresenting, distorting, and suppressing Dr. Wood's research.

Our educational systems typically "teach the test" and it is usually a multiple-choice test. We are not taught very good problem-solving skills. So it is very easy to manipulate a population with poor problem-solving skills. Get them to focus on the HOW or the WHO and they will never be able to solve the problem. That is the secret. Look at how the official story was designed. We were told "Bin Laden did it." But what is "it" that he did? And look at how the Truther Movement is managed. Well meaning people, looking for answers, are directed to focus on HOW or WHO (i.e. mini-neutron bombs did "it", thermite did "it", the Jooos did "it", "9/11 was an inside job" ). Truthers are also conditioned to attack anyone addressing Dr. Wood's research and are told "she has a bogus theory" when Dr. Wood has no theory, only EVIDENCE. It keeps the well-meaning Truthers from looking at the EVIDENCE like a rodeo clown distracts a bull.

Why? Look at what the EVIDENCE tells us. It tells us the truth. "Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic."

The empirical EVIDENCE tells us that the majority of the building turned into dust in mid air. Therefore, something that can do this (turn it into dust in mid air) must exist. That is the proof that it exists. It happened. You don't need the serial numbers for the gizmo to know what happened. When "white man" first arrived on the American continent with firearms, indigenous people did not need to know the serial numbers of their weapons to know what they can do. They didn't need to have seen such weapons in order to know that there exists a weapon that can fire a piece of metal fast enough to kill their brother. Likewise, by the end of the day on August 6, 1945, the people living near Hiroshima, Japan, did not need to understand how a nuclear bomb works in order to know that there exists a technology that can produce enormous amounts of heat or to know that there exists a super-duper Kinetic Energy Weapon (KEW) that is capable of destroying an entire city.

'Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura': Death Rays, 9/11 and Murders

@ 24 minute mark The John Hutchison Effect

@ 34 minute mark Dr. Judy Wood

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl%C2%ADayer_embedded&v=6AiFL9FSz-E

Wow! Over 47,000 views in six days!!!

I'm Emmanuel Goldstein and I approve this message
​

 

Is that how you think science works? I guess my assumption in my previous post was correct. "The rules of physics as [you] know them" are a little bent. Let me know when you want to discuss actual physics, and we'll continue this conversation. We can talk about Archimedes principal, Boyles law, and all sorts of other neat concepts that I'm just going to go ahead and assume you have no clue about.

 

Seriously? Just about ANY building collapse shows the debris rising above the structure's original height. It doesn't take much to move powdered concrete. I've seen you try to make lameassed claims before, but this is one of your worst.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xLzTKQ4-qU

There are plenty more videos where the dust cloud goes above the height of the original structure, but PLEASE, continue on with this retarded line of reasoning. I love watching people make complete fools of themselves.

 

ah so it doesnt weigh as much as solid concrete then

 

ugh wha? cough choke.... gasp


[video=youtube;42JAEzcFBFs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=42JAEzcFBFs&NR=1[/video]

early stages - translation; we have not done a full scale deployment in war yet










[video=youtube;g0zSB2WEtwU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0zSB2WEtwU[/video]



.

 

Wow. Seriously? Powdered concrete is still solid concrete. It doesn't become gaseous, liquid or become plasma, so it must be solid. Therefore powdered concrete weighs the same as larger chunks of concrete per volume, but in powdered form, it is able to become airborn whereas larger pieces of solid concrete cannot. Such a simple concept, yet so far beyond the reach of truthers.

 

Wait, you mean you can't back up your claim, but are going to pretend your argument is somehow still superior?

 

Which one of my claims do you think I need to back up? I didn't make any claims about wtc dust.
You did that...

 

sure he did, says who?