VIDEO: Brutal Assault Of 16 Year Old Girl In Europe By Thug?

I usually don't post inter-cultural conflicts like our friend but this was especially heinous on 3 counts. It was a sucker punch, secondly it was a woman, and third she was under 18.

Europe, in this case London in the UK has baffled me with this incident because they provide generous welfare to prevent crimes like this, yet it still happened. The statistics still state per capita they have lower crime rates because of their welfare safety net, but apparently they are lagging behind the rest of Europe and this crime is proof of that.

Hopefully more generous welfare and less austerity in Europe increases, or there will be more vicious crimes like this from the oppressed populace. Parental Discretion is advised before viewing the video.

[video=youtube;53e2iQdI2AM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53e2iQdI2AM[/video]

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/sho...-to-the-ground-with-vicious-blow-to-the-head/

 

If we had a 3% black population, we'd have less crime too.

 

WTF !!!!?

A liberal posts a video of a black guy assaulting someone ?!!!!!

Right now they surely must be wearing parka's in hell !

 

He's not a liberal.

 

Decades of progressive rhetoric about the injustice of the West has an effect. It creates the justification for hatred and violence by non-Europeans. Hate-filled rhetoric has consequences.

 

well he blamed white people for it so hell is just as hot as it always was.

 

Clearly a person that would be voting Barack Obama given the chance.

 

Now that's pathetic. That kind of crime should warrant 10+ years in prison.

 

Takes a special kind of man that would sneak up behind a girl and hit her with her back turned. Yep, special man.

 

Yeah I know, but I'm surprised he would still show it.

But yeah, I've read some of his other lunatic posts where he wants to pay people for NOT being violent.

 

Very nasty cowardly attack on a young girl but I have no doubt they will catch him as he has probably been caught on about 20 CCTV cameras.

 

I am a big fan of Camera's in crime ridden areas for just this reason

if it were up to me, we would end the drug war and put people like this in prison for a long long time, make an example of them

.

 

Possibly, because he appears oppressed. England is one of the few European countries that lowered their social safety net during the recession, so that is why they have this spur in violence.

 

Some people are just (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s , donkey punching , sharking or masturbating in public , unfortunately those videos are not uncommon in "underground" internet . This "prank" is nothing , previous fashions in London included HIV infected needles in theatre's sits and using waterguns to throw semen on women .

 

He "appears" oppressed ? Care to explain that please ?

 

Sounds good.

CCTV and the internet is allowing the reality of the urban areas to get past the liberal media censorship filters.

 

Sounds good.

CCTV and the internet is allowing the reality of the urban areas to get past the liberal media censorship filters.

 

That's right.

And since Britain is such a racist country poor black people there cannot afford video cameras to record the attacks on them the same way that white Brits can.

Its so unfair.

 

I'm a little lost on this one..

are you really saying that this attack took place because of the UK's austerity measures? That the UK hands out welfare to everyone just too keep crimes like this from happening?

It couldn't have been a random nutjob? a 'gang-initiation' act? A person who felt belittled by her in some way, because the voices in his head said she looked at him funny and went all crazy?.. or just a random act of violence?... since she looks to be covering her head, it couldn't have been a prejudice against Muslims or who he thought was Muslim?.. no,it was because he didn't get his 'welfare'.

I can't possibly see how a single random act of violence proves anything.. much less proof that the UK needs a better 'welfare safety net'..

 

I hope that scumbag spends the rest of his life in prison.

 

Since the UK is so pro minority the girl may have to pay him restitution.

Libs want to sweep this under the rug as just business as usual but it does make you wonder why blacks are so angry.

There is opportunity for all.

But demented thugs like this guy are probably always going to be behind the 8-ball while blaming whites for their troubles.

 

once again, how can anything be gleaned from this single act of violence? much less "why are all blacks angry". How is this single act representative of anything.. including race or socioeconomic status,

also, is the girl even white?

I'm in no way defending the scumbag.. a lengthy prison sentence sounds just fine to me.. I'm just trying to understand how you and the OP are drawing your conclusions based on literally no information other than the single act committed by a single person..

 

How about a long list of acts like this? Could you glean something from that?

 

I can't answer that.. you could give me 75 random acts and expect me to call it proof positive when it's really just 75 random acts... which is my point, you need more than just the act to claim it's simply 'all blacks are angry' or 'see what happens when they don't get welfare'..

an example..(completely made up crime, just making an example) 'a 17 year old boy was killed in a known gang neighborhood in a Chicago neighborhood yesterday'

you could easily extrapolate it was gang-violence from just that single line in a story about a single act of violence.. because you already have the parameters you need for that extrapolation..

otoh..

'13 year old girl shot and killed on bus'

doesn't give you any parameters to make any kind of statement on what was the cause... you could ask 'why are blacks so angry' or say 'this is what happens when austerity measures take away economic safety nets'..but you'd be wrong on both since it happen on the way to a school and it was an accidental shooting... (this crime did happen).. it had nothing to do with gang-violence,inner city violence,black anger or socioeconomic standing.

I'm just saying... how can anyone look at a single act, with zero information other than the aggressor was black and declare proof positive it was A,B,C or 3?

 

The perpetrator is a cultural minority in the state of Britain, so that is evidence that he has a high probability of being oppressed.