Colorado PBS Runs Film Sponsored by 9/11 Families: Experts Say 9/11 Was Demolition

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Munkle, Dec 8, 2012.

  1. Zosiasmom

    Zosiasmom New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    Messages:
    18,517
    Likes Received:
    250
    Trophy Points:
    0
    1. There have been anonymous sources
    2. Answered by whom and how? The 911 Commission Report left the families with a ton of unanswered questions
     
  2. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I've seen ONE picture of "wheels" over the years (the SAME one over and over mind you). I think I've seen a total of TWO pictures of anything relating to a plane regarding the Pentagon over all these years. You'd think there would be many pictures to confirm what is alleged. Photographic confirmation ought not be that difficult.
     
  3. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I doubt prosecution will ever occur. They'll just wait 30 or 40 years after key players are dead and after nobody gives a sheet at that point. It'll be one of those "interesting" tidbits in history. Nothing more.
     
  4. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hell, the "report" purposefully ignored many questions asked by the families. Do some research on family members that had issues with the so called "commission". Even the commission members themselves say they were lied to. Lazy folks ought to be able to verify at least that much very quickly.
     
  5. Munkle

    Munkle Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    352
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    28
    You bring up another good point, not that there should have been more pictures, but they should have preserved every piece of the aircraft debris they found, and attempted reconstruction. In every single commercial air accident they take every piece, no matter how little, and try to get the story from a reconstruction. The most important plane crash in history and they threw most of it away. Where is it? Any expert should be able to go look at it.

    Even better it's the same with the towers. They destroyed 99.5% of the evidence in the post unprecedented structural failures in building history. This is why prosecution can start with Rudy Giuliani, who signed the contracts under his city authority, so there is a paper trail. We get him talking over felony destruction of evidence at a crime scene, an open-and-shut case which guarantees 10 years, and see if he won't rat out Cheney as having ordered him.

    Rudy can then get easy time by saying he was scared for his life..."These guys were f*kking psychos, your honor...we're talking Dick Cheney. See in our world we called him "The Cheese," no one really knows why but maybe because he had the smell of death about him. The Cheese wasn't asking ya, he was telling ya..."


    SwissAir crash
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/09/12/f-swissair-crash.html
    [​IMG]


    9/11 Prosecution Plan: Start with Rudy Giuliani
    http://www.dailypaul.com/134798/911-prosecution-plan-start-with-rudy-giuliani
     
  6. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    That's the main problem with this whole BS story. Anything that COULD possibly prove what did or didn't happen, has either been confiscated, destroyed, shipped off or otherwise long since removed. We have a generic photo here, a very general photo of something else there, that could be anything, anywhere, taken who knows when. Abstract pieces of so called "evidence" out of sequence or with no way to confirm where the supposed evidence was actually taken or what we're supposedly looking at. Verification is impossible. I guess that's why they only risk on or two generic photos shown over and over as "evidence" when it comes to things like plane parts.

    Good points...well taken Sir.
     
  7. Speeders R Murderers

    Speeders R Murderers Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    4,889
    Likes Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Destroying evidence is a crime but no one is being prosecuted for it and the establishment media won't even talk of it. But there's no conspiracy!!
     
  8. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Fair enough.

    Then why did you bring it up?

    (yawn) A plan that was never carried out now means the government was behind 9/11. Got it.

    Actually most of the country DOESN'T believe 9/11 was an inside job. Most of the country believes that truthers run the gamut between attention whores like Richard Gage, Jim Fetzer and David Griffin or are delusional paranoid nutcases like Phil Jayhan and the Let's Roll crowd.

    Not to put words in your mouth but are you saying that since the government DOES do wrong and lies that it is likely that they are behind 9/11? And if that's not what you are saying then what exactly ARE you saying?
     
  9. The Real American Thinker

    The Real American Thinker New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2012
    Messages:
    9,167
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because it's the topic, and generally that's how forum threads work.

    All I'm saying is that it is entirely possible, and I think it's rather hypocritical of some of the hardcore anti-truthers to act like it's so stupid to believe the government would lie and is capable of terrible things when the administration it happened under is from THEIR side, while believing all sorts of crazy ass conspiracy theories when the administration involved isn't theirs.
     
  10. peoplevsmedia

    peoplevsmedia Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    6,765
    Likes Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I had my property repeatedly vandalized because my father kept speaking out to customers in a bar that he does not believe the official 9:11 theory. we decided to close the restaurant business because of that. we have another business we can rely on instead. I will watch this movie in full, thanks. Maybe if one day the full truth will come out, we can reopen, and be viewed as heroes instead of anti American scumbags.
     
  11. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I guess they had to just get rid of the evidence before somebody realized something. Little did they know they would have so much time to react to the public's stupidity and ignorance. Even THEY figured the public would have been smarter....sooner.
     
  12. Alaska Slim

    Alaska Slim Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Awkward question, something I've noticed: Why does AE9/11 never talk about the Pentagon? Y'know, that other part to 9/11?

    It's almost as if they knew it'd be bad news to take on the ASCE, a society of 120,000 competent civil engineers, who were the ones that compiled the Pentagon performance report.

    "The lack of evidence is only evidence that the cover-up was perfect!" BP

    Uh, drone technology circa 2001? 10's of 1,000s of pounds of thermite enter a building without any indication or record of being sent or arriving?

    Really, you should never cite intent, which is far more easily explained by simply ****-up. And the only way you'd think it's "possible" this was an inside job, is if you're an outsider to every academic trade of relevance, and think there's a secret kabal within the military who'd like nothing more than to kill the people they're sworn to protect.

    ... Oh, and you're also advocating what would have to be history's largest single employer. Funny how none have talked.

    The difference pal? In events like Benghazi? We're advocating the Government screwed up, and then worked to cover its ass, hardly a rare occurrence, they just weren't honest about it. 9/11 theories aren't about screw-ups, but rather a hyper-competent Government that played along/who was the primary organizer for the attack. Two very different stances, and everyone would realize the former applies to 9/11 as well, if you just bother to hear it from the horse's mouth.
     
  13. CharlieChalk

    CharlieChalk Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,791
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    tbf I watch all the aircrash shows and they rebuild the plane to find out why it crashed, I think in this case its pretty obvious why it crashed, cause it was steered into a building, so rebuilding the plane isnt really necessary from that standpoint
     
  14. Munkle

    Munkle Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    352
    Likes Received:
    81
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Except we are not sure what was steered into the building, because they destroyed the evidence and confiscated the video.

    LOL so on one hand the government confiscates all the video on the most heavily-surveillanced building in the world, which would show what crashed into the building. Then it destroys the evidence, then criticizes truthers for saying "we don't know what crashed into the buildings."

    You guarantee that people have to guess, then criticize them for guessing.

    Surely you see how that works. It's called a "honey pot" to generate endless, inconclusive speculation to distract from clearer evidence, like molten steel and nanothermite residue.
     
  15. Gorn Captain

    Gorn Captain Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Messages:
    35,580
    Likes Received:
    237
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Look, it's very simple....

    The supposed planes you saw go into the Twin Towers were holograms projected using Roswell Crash technology.

    The explosives were placed and detonaed by the same guys who killed Tupac and Biggie.

    And Barbara Olson is now a sex-slave to JFK and Hitler's Brain at Area 52 (one more secret than "51") in Argentina.

    And I know because Elvis showed me the video. The rest of you sheeple just stay ignorant and let them sap and impurify all your precious bodily fluids with water fluoridation.
     
  16. iJoeTime

    iJoeTime Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I never really gave the 911 conspiracies much creedance until a recent work trip I was on with my Firms principle structural engineer. The guy has 35 years in the field and somehow 911 came up and without batting an eye he says: "No way those planes alone brought down those buildings." It kind of spooked me to be honest.
     
  17. Speeders R Murderers

    Speeders R Murderers Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    4,889
    Likes Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The vandals were not the customers. They were govt agents who found out what your father was saying.
     
  18. Speeders R Murderers

    Speeders R Murderers Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    4,889
    Likes Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes it is hard to believe that planes hitting skyscrapers could cause a unitary collapse at near free fall speed. And it happened twice. But the real killer is that the third building, WTC7, was NOT hit by a plane!!! No question the muslim conspiracy theory is a lie.
     
  19. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Except if the plane may have been remote controlled but, we'd never know cause the evidence was shipped away ASAP.
     
  20. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sounds like a smart dude....wish I could chat with him.
     
  21. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Operation Northwoods is the topic? Only if it implies that the government was behind 9/11.

    Which you immediately ran away from when I asked if that was your implication.

    He's right. It was the planes AND the fires that ensued.

    Hey, is that a black van parked across the street from your house? How long has THAT been there?

    They didn't fall at near free fall speed. And it happened twice because there were two towers and two planes.

    But about WTC 7 . . . so a building can't collapse unless a plane hits it? Having another building fall on it and raging fires burning for hours won't bring it down unless a plane hits it?

    Really going over the same old debunked horsecrap time and time again is really tiresome.
     
  22. The Real American Thinker

    The Real American Thinker New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2012
    Messages:
    9,167
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not really. The topic is a government conspiracy to crash planes into important buildings to rally public support for failed, unnecessary wars - to simplify.

    Operation Northwoods was a specific government plan to do exactly that.

    If you go back and look at the context in which I brought up ONW, it was in response to another poster - JIMV - asserting that the idea that the government could or would do something like this was "stupid." So in rebuttal, I cited ONW, which clearly shows that they are capable of such a thing.

    Do you understand now, or do I need to draw a picture?

    I'd hardly call telling the truth about my post "running away."
     
  23. supaskip

    supaskip Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,832
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Believe the official story, or don't.

    Considering who controls what officials saw/sampled/investigated/etc on the site, "independent" experts brought in could very well be given the correct materials to examine. Nobody [sane :)] suspects an inside job or some false flag, or whatever... EVER.... until it's somehow revealed to be so.

    Easy to look back in hindsight on other situations throughout the centuries regarding war, (including the cold war), spying, and other aspects; people were fooled for years from "false flag" situations. There was no reason to suspect that it was "false".... why would we do that now with the towers?
     
  24. FFbat

    FFbat New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,023
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hey now, don't dishonor the victims...
     
  25. supaskip

    supaskip Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,832
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Agree completely; as I said above - false flags, or other such actions, are nothing new.... and nobody knows about them until the .. whistle is blown. To suggest that 9/11 is an inside job is not far fetched, it is a possibility, but we trust our government to provide all the correct evidence for independent review, right?
     

Share This Page