Lesbian woman demands double standard when she has sex with 15-year-old

Spot on. This was one hundred percent pure MALICE. The "victim's" parents are pure evil.

Any claim this is to help their daughter is laughable...yeah, watching her parents trying to get her lover thrown in prison for 15 years is GREAT for her mental state. I almost hope she takes a chainsaw to her parents.

 

WHAT?!?! Are you drunk?

- - - Updated - - -

Wow, you don't even know just how jaw-droppingly STUPID this makes you look! They're often called Romeo And Juliet Laws!

 

Honestly...a suicide pact might be the best possible outcome here. Both girls' lives are basically ruined now.

 

No, I don't think so.

Obviously, the older of the two will suffer the most, but both have a chance to live a normal life, maybe even together if they grow up to choose that road.

The younger one will recover, and lead a normal life (either as an homosexual, bisexual or heterosexual. . .she is still young enough to discover her true orientation). But her relationship with her parents will NOT recover. . .and neither should it!

I am still hoping something will happen to put some sense in the head of the prosecutor.

Wikepedia defines "sexual abuse" as this:

 

So...one will be a sex offender for life (assuming she doesn't end up killed in prison), the other will nurse a white-hot hatred of her parents (justified) and will probably blame herself for what happened to her lover (not justified). Short of all charges being broomed (unlikely), there is no POSSIBLE positive outcome here.

 

http://www.change.org/petitions/ass...n-18-year-old-girl-in-a-same-sex-relationship


Here is the online petition to try and stop the prosecution of Kaitlyn, the 18 y/o in this case.

 

Florida’s “Romeo and Juliet” Law

Notice to all who think that a 18 y/o should be held to the same legal standards as a 21+ y/o...a 21 y/o CANNOT petition the court to be removed from the sex offenders list, an 18 y/o can under certain conditions.

 

Thanks for that.

You not only give your opinion, but you act on it! Good job.

I'll go sign that petition right now!

 

Not the OP here...but on a soap opera board I once saw an entire thread dedicated to whether so and so was having sex because he kissed another woman. And you would not believe the replies that answered YES! Now to me: is is it wrong when you're in a relationship to kiss someone else? Yes. But if you haven't declared mutual fidelity...you're not cheating. But I never thought of kissing as having sex until that day and it made me think of Bill Clinton saying he did not have sex with that woman when she gave him a BJ. Hmmmm....guess we really need to know the definition of having sex!

- - - Updated - - -

Not the OP here...but on a soap opera board I once saw an entire thread dedicated to whether so and so was having sex because he kissed another woman. And you would not believe the replies that answered YES! Now to me: is is it wrong when you're in a relationship to kiss someone else? Yes. But if you haven't declared mutual fidelity...you're not cheating. But I never thought of kissing as having sex until that day and it made me think of Bill Clinton saying he did not have sex with that woman when she gave him a BJ. Hmmmm....guess we really need to know the definition of having sex!

 

Really. Name the law that states that.

 

Post #332 - 2 posts up

 

I already provided a long quote from Wikepedia.

Here it is again:

If you are interested in more details, why don't you go read the whole segment?

 

You illustrated nothing. Perversity of a sexual predator does not appear to bother you at all.

- - - Updated - - -

Bull crap. There are lots of cases where 18 year old young men have ruined their lives by having sex with underage nimors and they have to report themselves as sexual predators.

 

How is she "Demanding a double standard"? Did she want a similar heterosexual relationship to end with registering as a sex offender? It sounds to me like she is just arguing her case, like a male would do in the exact same situation.

You just made up a bunch of random (*)(*)(*)(*) at the bottom there. She isn't trying to make it a "homosexual rights issue". She isn't claiming that she is being prosecuted by the state for being a homosexual, her mother is claiming that the parents pursued charges because she is a female. You do not know the motives of the parents so you have no idea if that is true or not.

It seems to me that YOU are the one who wants to make this about homosexuality by inventing an opinion and then arguing against it.

 

She is an adult woman 18 years of age. Her victim was a child 15 years of age. That makes her a pedoplilic pervert who preys on children to get pervert jollies, she is a sexual predator, and that is indefensable. The double standard is that her mother has started an online campaigne to prevent prosecution. Blackrook did not make up anything, there are many 18 year old men who preyed on minor children claiming love and still had to pay the legal price. If the predator and the victim are both female, that is by definition homosexual. I hope the full weight of the law is applied here and she serves her full sentence.

 

I didn't say I illustrated my point, I said I couldn't have done it better than you.

Because it isn't perverse and she isn't a sexual predator. Of course, according to the laws in my state (Tennessee), there was no crime:

(a) Statutory rape is sexual penetration of a victim by the defendant or of the defendant by the victim when the victim is at least thirteen (13) but less than eighteen (1 years of age and the defendant is at least four (4) years older than the victim.

Your state has a similar clause, so what she did sin't against the law in Oregon either. Just Florida. Crazy ole Florida.

So an 18 year old girl is a grown woman and an 18 year old boy is a young man.

I look at 18 year old humans as kids. I wouldn't even call them young adults yet, but it isn't like standard cutoff can be applied across an age group to determine maturity.

 

If they are 18 they can vote. And they are legally an adult at eighteen. Below that they are children. The principle is greater that the rule. She is a sexual predator committing an indecent sexual act on a decidedly immature minor for her own perverse gratification. That is a crime.

 

But not everywhere. Including my state and yours.

 

So what? It is still a crime.

 

Being an escaped slave used to be a crime, was it right to punish slaves for escaping? Sometimes the law is wrong and needs to change.

Kaitlyn hasn't hurt anyone, something that doesn't hurt anyone shouldn't be a crime. Age of consent laws are arbitrary, that's why they're different in each state. There is no evidence that consensual sex before a certain age is harmful.

The age of consent is 14 in Austria, Germany, Italy and Portugal. It's 13 in Spain: these countries don't have more traumatized teens than any other country. If anything a lower age of consent allows teens to practice safe sex and have better education.

If age differences are harmful why is it legal for a 40 year old to have sex with an 18 year old? Why is it legal for an 18 year old to be exploited in pornography? Is an 18 year old magically immune from exploitation and harm?

There shouldn't be an age of consent. Sex should only be illegal if it's rape or if there is evidence that it harms someone.

 

Its no secret that 18 is an adult and 14 is a minor.
Sexual relations is illegal no matter the gender of both or either.
Its the law, and has been for decades.
Her parents, had they been smart. Would have told her to break it off when she turned 18 or at least keep it too themselves.
Not broadcast it to the world.

 

Um, no. Once one party is 18, all bets are off. All previous relations dont matter. Unless it was rape.
Run it through the gay agenda all you wish, the 18 year old was wrong.

 

Where?