Lesbian woman demands double standard when she has sex with 15-year-old

That "child molester" is still, herself, a child. You're just anti-sex, and most especially anti-same-sex. You're going to end up looking foolish.

 

That "child" can vote. Can voluntarily enlist in the Military. Drive the highways with 2 years experience in a 2 ton car.

Otherwise, you haven't a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing clue about me. Your post is stupid as (*)(*)(*)(*) as well. KMA.

 

Same sex people and their supporters are out of touch of normalcy and truth that is why for them it is okay to have sex with minors, it is okay to have sex with same sex as long as it is consensual this also mean that a 10 year old can have sex with an 18 year old as long as their is consent this is how homophobic same sex people are.

 

too bad that you will never conceive your own child because then you will understand. You view things through your rainbow colored glasses which has no place for right and wrong. I did not allow my daughter to date a senior when she was a Freshman. Yes, I knew they would try and sneak around but she knew that I was watching. There is something wrong with any 18 year old who goes after a 14 year old. Of course she hated me for this but today knows that I was right and was being a parent. In other words, making the correct decision because she was incapable of doing that.

How often do you see seniors in HS hanging around with Freshmen? Heck, the Freshmen can't even get into an R rated movie. There are huge developmental differences between the 2 ages and I've posted that within this thread.

 

That is not a perspective, that is moral surrender to the gay agenda. She is ahomosexual pervert pedophile predator who victimized an emotionally inferior innocent. She is 18, that makes her an adult.

 

Present company excluded I suppse.

 

No, you are assuming entirely too much. I am sure that most of us would have no problem if a parent interupted a 30-year-old male on top of their 15-year-old son or daughter by slamming a baseball bat upside his head.

 

There is no question in my mind that Hunt crapped in her own mess kit. I do not trust her judgement to the point that she should be allowed to be a nurse.All that aside, I do feel that her punishment, under an ideal system, would be on the low end of the spectrum.

I base my view on these matters on the degree of harm that can result from the acts.

Sexual acts between two girls in a relationship should, of ocurse, be the least serious, becoming more serious as the age difference increases. Obviously, the possibility of physical harm here is the lowest in the spectrum. Emotionally, it is still pretty much on the low end. It still increases with the age difference and among of coercive power the older girl has over the other. What Hunt was offered strikes me as about right.

The next level should be for older woman/minor boy. Again, the severity should be cionsidered aggravated by age differential and, more importantly, amount of authority the woman has over the boy. Whether or not the woman uses birth control should also be a factor. The most severe harm i see from such a relationship is the possibility of the boy's being stuck with child support payments. A senior cheerleader wants to do a freshman boy, and she insists on a condom, not that big a deal. Teacher wants to have a student's baby, MAJOR issue.

The MILF at the end of the block just manages to connect, and she takes all the precautions, still not as bad as the teacher getting freaky. If either of them become coercive, game over. Generally speaking, unless there is some transmission of an STD, the mature female genitalia cannot harm immature male genitalia.

Heterosexual intercourse between a mature male and a female child is inherent with a lot of risks. Pregnancy is just the most obvious. A fully-mature male organ can do horrendous harm to immature female genitalia. It can even be fatal. This goes near the top of the spectrum. Again, increasing age and authority and degree of coercion are aggravating factors.

Male on male is a bit more maleable because of the wide variety of types of acts it may involve, but, again, age and authority are aggravating circumstances. It involves bringing a boy to do something that he might not, inherently want to do, and the physical harm can be very severe. The emotional harm goes without saying, especially if the minor were not clearly inclined toward homosexuality tobegin with.

Just my USD.02.

 

It's funny you mention CA. CA district attorney's have this posted on their websites:

Notice the emphasis on the needs of the victim, and the intent to use discretion to decide if criminal charges are appropriate before they decide to prosecute a case. Not all cases are warranted, and in some cases prosecution causes more harm than good. For example, in cases where the girl becomes pregnant, it's often in the best interest that the man marries the female instead... Prosecuting him instead may just devastate the female, cause her to need welfare benefits, and cause additional expense to the state by having to prosecute and provide for the male as an inmate in prison. Prosecution is usually not done unless the DA thinks that the offender will repeat, or that the situation is causing psychological harm to the underaged (or more so than prosecution would). These situations are not cut-and-dry. And the DA doesn't always get it right, for sure. And I'm sure there's cases where the DA would not prosecute if not for public attention or attention from parents pressuring them to do so.

Statutory rape is just a difficult law because the exact needs for the situation can be very delicate and diverse with lots of emotion on all sides. But the needs of the underaged should be considered first, if possible. As for your best friend's partner, maybe he deserved it, maybe he was repeating, maybe the DA was pressured to prosecute when it wasn't necessary, maybe he wasn't responding to warnings from the DA. Who knows. Anecdotes aside, the first question here should be what's in the best interest of the underaged girl. Prosecuting just for the sake of prosecuting is dangerous and potentially far more harmful than helpful. Not that I'm trying to be sympathetic to the girl being prosecuted in this case, I'm just equally as sympathetic to the girl who has to watch her girlfriend get prosecuted, and I hope that they were careful to determine that this was in her best interest.... and not just pressured to prosecute by her parents.

 

A.K.A. you have nothing but wild accusations.

 

No. I don't.

http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2010/may/15/man-20-charged-having-lewd-relationship-underage-g/

 

My opinion on the matter has nothing whatsoever to do with the gender of the couple in question, only the fact that they are high school classmates. Any violation of the law here is a technicality, and not a case of someone being harmed, assuming the information currently available is accurate.

 

Here's more.

http://frankfort.patch.com/articles/midlothian-man-accused-of-sexual-relationship-with-underage-girl

 

Here is yet another.

http://frankfort.patch.com/articles/midlothian-man-accused-of-sexual-relationship-with-underage-girl

 

Being a sexual predator is a "technicality"? Only in progressive MaO'Bama voting leftistloserville would that be true.

 

The parents of the victim are speaking out...finally...and Hunt is a homosexual perverse predator and deserves her 15 years in jail.

 

That (along with empty bigotry and absolutely vicious homophobia) is all he EVER has.

 

Bigotry? Homophobia? Both progressive leftist loser false labels that is supposed to ingender guilt. Fail. I am right, as always.

Note to self: when posters do not engage, it means that those who think they are in opposition, know they are wrong, are in reality are seeking comfort and solice from those who share their false narrative.

 

Indeed, always far to the right side, and always wrong about everything.

lol, you crack me up. Some of the things that you come up with are just so outlandish, I can't imagine how anyone could use logic to arrive at these conclusions.

So 18 and 15 is wrong...

How about 17 and 14?

17 and 13?

Both of those are legal in Florida....

How about this:

If a 16yo takes naked pictures of their self and sends them to an 18yo, who is guilty of child porn? The 16yo or the 18yo?

 

And now with the baseless name-calling and personal attacks...right on cue. Calling me a "leftist" is truly the height of idiocy.

 

I love to watch leftist dog paddleing, all kinds of flailing about and noisy splashing, very little movement.

 

I called you nothing. I was acurately identifying the false labels of bigotry and homophobia. Thin skinned? Much. It was you, I believe, who inintiated the attack.

 

See...you are, again, not being truthful.

 

That was a non-post that did not address anything I wrote. Please don't quote me unless you are going to address the post. There is no need to waste my time with a false notification.

 

Unbelievable or believable same sex and their supporters have all kinds of excuses as to why minors should be allow to have sex as long as they gave their consent so an 11 or 14 year year old that demands with a tantrum "mommy, mommy, daddy, I want to have sexxxx with that woman!!!" the parents should not stand in the minors' way to have sex.

And the most craziest things is that many prominent gays and lesbian celebrities are speaking against parents who refuse to allow their minors to have sex!!!

[video=youtube;cY7YOGskMhg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY7YOGskMhg[/video]