Daniel Adkins, The White/Hispanic Trayvon Martin

[video=youtube;GEv2HlamT4w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEv2HlamT4w[/video]

http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/story/19132048/2012/07/27/man-indicted-in-taco-bell-shooting

No one seems to care. Maybe Adkins skin isn't dark enough for the race-hustlers and bleeding heart liberals?

Maybe anti-racism is just a code word for anti-White afterall?

Furthermore, this case is so uninteresting to the race-pimps who run the mainstream media that I can't even find any information on what has happened to the black George Zimmerman, Cordell Jude. Was he convicted? Who knows? *Shrugs*

Welcome to America 2013.

 

I'm not sure what the point is here .... since Zimmy didn't flee after shooting to death a black teen with candy & soda 70 feet from his home ... he's innocent because he's an afro-peruvian jew disguised as an armed neighborhood watch ?

 

http://rochester.ynn.com/content/top_stories/490926/jury-finds-roderick-scott-not-guilty/

No MSM for Cervini

I await the outrage from the left.

 

Thank you for educating me about this case. I had no idea about it. Not surprising really since the mainstream media refuses to cover stories of black on White killings.

Who knew there were so many White Trayvon Martin's out there??

 

Sorry. Don't see any parallels.

From the story it appears Scott witnessed a crime in progress, gave fair warning, and fired only when attacked despite giving the warning.

I don't see where the police failed to conduct a full investigation.
I don't see where the police made no attempt to identify the victim.
I don't see where the police and prosecutor refused to prosecute.

So, other than racism, what's your point?

 

It goes something like "If it was a black guy and a white teen, he would go to jail".

You are right, it does vary on some accounts. For instance... the giant black man did not have his head bashed in. He wasn't even touched. The kid "lunged" at him. He witnessed a kid looking in a car... not his car. See... this is one of the similarities... there had been a rash of car break ins in the neighborhood by teens. The shooter, however, went after these kids who were not on his property. He chased them down and shot one.

You really see NO similarities here? I mean... I guess taking spare change and game boys out of cars is a more severe crime to you than a violent assault. I dunno. Where these cases diverge, should illustrate how much WORSE the shoot was than Zimmermans.

And yet not a peep out of the MSM.

 

you ignore the available facts to insert your assumptions pretending they have some bearing.

"From the story it appears Scott witnessed a crime in progress, gave fair warning, and fired only when attacked despite giving the warning."

These are the facts.

Unlike Zimmerman there is no evidence his response was based on race.
Unlike Zimmerman he was witnessing an actual or suspect crime in progress,
Unlike Zimmerman he announced his presence, his reason for being there and gave warning that he was armed.

The parallels exist only in your race driven mind.

 

*crickets and yawn* for this thread

 

they are trying soooo hard to find an equivalency to the Trayvon/Zimmerman case, because in their eyes (just like Zimmerman's eyes), Trayvon WAS committing a crime......(way before he laid any hands on Zimmerman.....)

 

I know. It's become part of their religion.

 

The roles are reversed.

The white/hispanic was killed and the black was the one who claimed self-defense.

And guess what? No outrage. No protests. No national media coverage. No Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson in sight. Not a single liberal here gives a f*** because the victim isn't black.

The point is to highlight the double standard and the racism of blacks and self-hate/white guilt of white liberals.

 

You forget that GZ went public with his videos and his website begging for money.. and moving out of his house on 2/27.

 

Why should this determine whether or not people should care about the victim? Does caring for the victim only depend on the perp`s attitude and actions ?

 

Yes but how does this square-up that your messiah is a mongoloid .... a piece of meat with eyes ... who shot to death a teen with candy & soda ?

 

truer words have never been spoken

 

Depends.

Zimmerman defended himself from a violent savage, but I haven't been following the case in the OP to make any sort of judgement.

But, if the evidence suggests the man was defending himself then he should go free, just as Zimmerman did.

 

Well, how many whites in hoodies caused Zimmy his paranoia that created his own danger then seek out that danger and shoot to death a white ?

 

How many reports of local robberies were done by whites?

 

You forget the bounty..... anyone would move with a bounty on their head.

 

Correct .... this will be asked of Zimmy when he takes the stand in civil-actions ...

 

Ahhh so you're saying how many whites does Zimmerman profile is that what you're asking?

 

Correct ... in his civil-actions ... Zimmy will testify as to how many whites he reported in his 50 calls to 911/NEN ... this will show how he was able to deduce Martin was a suspicious person because of all the break-ins that caused Zimmys paranoia and to create the danger he was in and seek-out that danger resulting in his shooting to death Martin ....

 

What if there are no whites in the neighborhood he worked in?

 

What if's are perfectly ok as a strategy in litigation.

 

Well you can't get him for racial profiling in a largely homogenous neighborhood. It's why the prosecution in the trial didn't pursue it. Because 1) there's no evidence to suggest he did and 2) You can't racially profile blacks in a neighborhood that's.....entirely black.

That's stupid logic.