So Zimmerman couldn't just talk to Trayvon? (Common Sense discussion inside)

I realize that staying on topic is really difficult, but do try.

 

Common sense? Horse malarkey. Just a tale of fiction without a scintilla of evidence.

Despite all your fairy tales, Thugvon is still dead, Zimmermann is walking and driving too fast and the whole incident is being forgotten. Obama needs a fresh diversion.

Worse yet, his friendly MSM is evaporating.

 

Both statements say "I'm a liar".

 

So...Zimmerman did try to talk to him. So.......what was your op about again? Why couldn't Zimmerman just talk to Trayvon?

 

"Deadly" accurate, would be more accurate? OJZ is hidden away, like the wuss that he is though so, society is safer once again.

 

He's packing, so i know he's safe from thugs hiding in bushes and jumping him again.

 

Your 'Rule 10' violation has been reported.

 

The 'attack' occurred at the 'T'. An eye witness testified that he saw the assault occurring at the 'T'. Stop making up stories.

 

It really is such a sad world we live in when you are warranted a beating because you got out of your car, even though people know he was calling the cops on this kid. Shouldn't have gotten in the violent black kids way! Thats the message that everyone is saying, at least to me, my interpretation when they say he should of jus stayed in the car, and its accepted. Sad. Congrats Sharpton!

 

No, rosepop is not.... its not trolling when you cant refute the statement.....rosepop is right....all this "he was just buying skittles, iced tea, and was allowed to be there is just trying to distract from the fact that trayvon jumped Zimmerman, who is allowed to confront him.

Trayvon did have a right to be there
Zimmerman did have a right to be suspicious and ask what trayvon was up to
Trayvon did have a right to not answer


Trayvon did not have a right to assault Zimmerman because he didn't like the question.

That's the bottom line that determines the outcome of this case.

 

How else are your supposed to run them over?

 

This has been hashed and rehashed and the official testimony has been cited NUMEROUS times in these threads. A witness neighbor testified that he saw Martin on top in an mma style ground and pound.

At this point, asking for people to continuously recite it everytime you can't justify that situation is like asking for citing anytime someone says that planes flew into the wtc before you believe it.

 

You ignoring numerous instances of the information you asked for is just you trying to ignore what is now common knowledge. Its not our responsibility to educate you about clearly established facts in this case

Do I need to cite the official coroner's report saying that Martin is still dead, too, or is that common knowledge enough for ya by now

 

Still having a hard time accepting the verdict?

Fact: Det. Serino testified under oath that he felt that GZ was telling the truth.

Fact: GZ passed a voice stress test.

Fact: GZ talked to police at length without a lawyer.

Fact: Det; Serino testified that GZ was happy to hear that the confrontation was caught on video. It wasn't of course, but Serino lied to judge GZ's reaction.

(Immediately being glad that the confrontation was recorded on video is hardly the reaction of a guilty man. It is what we would expect from a crime victim who had to defend his life.)

Fact: George Zimmerman stated that TM confronted him and asked him if he had a problem. GZ relied that he did not have a problem and tried to get his cell phone out of his pocket.

(This is when TM sucker punched him and then savagely beat him on the ground MMA style.)

Fact: George Zimmerman's injuries are consistent with being punched in the nose.

So, to answer you question as logically and as factually as possible, GZ couldn't talk to TM because TM attacked him almost immediately after confronting him.

 

The self-described "No Limit (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)" PREFERRED VIOLENCE:

 

'4H' Your words: Had to take all your nonsense out of the comment to trim it down to the essence.

for one, TM didn't have to answer, but that's not when the supposed attack happend, it supposedly happend AFTER Zim walked back to his truck. " So you are now claiming the 'attack' occurred "AFTER" George had walked back to his truck. You are claiming George had walked back to his truck and then T sucker punched George right? An eye witness testified that the 'attack' he saw occurred in front of his house which is a bit down from the 'T' junction. Any ideas how 'T' and George ended up in front of the witnesses house? I suggest you check out the layout of the complex visa vi where George had parked his truck as it relates to where the eye witness saw T on top of George wailing on him. It may help you understand what happened better.
IF your silly made up story was true then how about explaining why George had gone back his truck only to be confronted by 'T'. That would have to meant our 'scared little Black cherub' intentionally pursued George..........Right?

 

We have witnesses who heard it start at the T and we have Zimmermans keys. Sorry its proven. Even the prosecution had to concede it by the end of their case.

 

I'd say Thugvon found his limit.

 

Just because I disrespected a vigilante? My apologizes if I offended you. I didn't realize he is your hero.

 

You've been on this forum long enough to know that Jenna Lauer and others said that they heard the argument in the direction of the T.

At this point you are abusing rule 10 to harass people.

 

B/c at this point there's literally nothing left for them to do.
They don't understand that had Bernie had the slightest centilla of evidence to support the charges he damn well would have been screaming his head off about it to the jurors. He had nothing.
This is at the heart of why the 'T-Boners' can't let it go. They climbed aboard a stinking rotten dead horse b/c at the time it was the one that was going to show the world how 'racist' all the supporters of George were/are. What happened? The complete opposite with a jury aquital for good measure. Boo Whooo.