Florida school bus beatdown goes unnoticed by self-styled civil rights activists

This is an easy one. The victim is the wrong color and the perps are black. This is not a money maker for the racial grievance industry. They will pass on it. Now, if three white kids jumped a black kid on video, this would be a different ballgame. The school district could be shaken down and forced to pay for "racial sensitivity" training or simply sued for being indifferent to racism.

 

In all fairness and accuracy, what does this case have to do with civil rights?

Obviously the fight should not have happened, but if I understand it correctly it was over drug dealing, not civil rights.

I am not sure why anyone would expect civil libertarians to be angry over a senseless beating that has nothing to do with civil liberties.

 

I saw that on the news just an hour ago, and I had the same reaction. The cops and school district predictably claimed that race was not a factor, and everybody concealed the race of the victim.
One of these days, the Left is going to start a race war.

 

Because, although a violent black thug being killed while assaulting a Hispanic man (called "white" by the media) had nothing to with race, the Left black outrage was massive enough to attempt to erode the natural right of self defense and make up absurd allegations that the Fed is now investigating for political purposes.

Now, a white kid is beat up by three older drug-dealing black kids, and not a whisper of racism from ANYONE.

 

I think he had the civil right to an education free of violence. Are there specific civil rights that count and others that don't?

- - - Updated - - -

They would prefer a white surrender to their idea of social justice.

 

It appears the causation was over drug dealing, and the fight, though horrific, had nothing to do with civil rights.

I don't understand why the critics in the article are condemning civil rights groups when it appears to have nothing to do with civil rights.

Additionally, the children in question have been arrested and charged.

 

Depends ... these were all teens who would be arrested for having a gun ... like Martin ... so nobody got shot to death.

 

Again... how is this relevant to... anything, really?

 

Well sure ... if the NRA had told Jeb Bush to include in the stand your ground law that that white teens can carry firearms ... the white kid could have popped caps in the blacks and everything would be good.

 

The problem is with the obvious double standard. There was NOTHING to indicate that Zimmerman was racist, and he DEFENDED HIS LIFE by acting against the assailant.

There is SOMETHING to indicate that three black kids - unprovoked! - assaulted a white boy two year their junior and kicked/punched him more than 50 times in the span of 60 seconds.

The former: self defense against a "minority" by a Hispanic called white. Outrage follows despite all evidence to the contrary.

The latter: assault against the "minority" of this specific situation by the blacks. Declared "not racial."

- - - Updated - - -

At least we can agree on something!

 

Well sure it does ... the unarmed black-teen Martin was shot to death by an armed white-adult Zimmy.

 

I do wonder what caused all that, but it was ridiculously brutal. I grew up in Louisiana and saw a few black/white fights but this is probably worse than anything I ever saw.

 

Funny how everyone is claiming the beating was over the kid's race, when it was actually over his actions and had nothing to do with his skin color.

 

They also never said what happened to the kid.

 

The majority of black children are cultivated from birth to hate white people. Even by white people themselves. A black child simply cannot be isolated from the "hate whitey" propaganda. Music, movies, schools, teachers, parents. The hatred against whites is not only open and without social consequences, but it's also encouraged by both blacks and self-loathing liberal whites.

So, this comes as no shock at all. Where else could these young black adults get so much stored up anger/rage to do this?

 

And you know this how?

Were you born a poor black child?

[video=youtube;rfAvQp-Uk5I]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfAvQp-Uk5I[/video]

 

Are you suggesting one must be of a particular race to recognize/comprehend something?

That sounds racist.

 

Can you list the "civil rights" that you speak of?

Children? LOL!!!

 

Actually, it's the double standard that is interesting. If liberals saw three white teens severely beat a black kid even for snitching, they would almost certainly say that race played a role in the beating or the severity of the beating. Can you imagine, if a white bus driver stood there and let it happen? Whew!!

 

"Liberals" wouldn't be prostituting a schoolyard squabble that got out of hand as a racist incident. The snitch got his, and then some. End of. Stormfronters want to make more of it.

 

Is that right?

 

I'm as ready as I can be for it..............participating in these threads about the Zimmerman/Martin fiasco has shown me a lot about my fellow man

- - - Updated - - -

actually, I had similar thoughts about the heavy handed reaction about the Zimmerman/Martin event.

 

This was one of the most disgraceful and abusive things I have ever seen in my life. I watched this video and I got so angry it wasn't funny. All 3 of these boys should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, if I was this kid's father somebody would pay and pay dearly. This kind of garbage should never be allowed to happen to an innocent kid.

 

Look, the assailants have been arrested and are now being prosecuted. That was more than happened to Zimmerman at first and he had killed someone. The police also took evidence. If the assailants eventually are adjudged "not guilty" due to "lack of evidence" I will see your problem. Until that happens, you don't really have one.

Oh, and btw, I have not and don't believe I have throughout this controversy, seen this Zimmerman business as a civil rights issue. I don't believe I've brought race up in any of my posts, and certainly not as a major point. I speak as a person who has had considerable problems with neighborhood gun nuts. (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s who think the right to bear arms is the right to shoot at me, my pets and my children. We are all the same race but we disagree on their right to hunt on my private property and this, to their way of thinking, gives them the "Constitutional right" to threaten me and my family and animal's lives.

 

when it is black on white crime, it isn't racially motivated, can't be. But if it's an other color on black it IS racially motivated, What has become apparent is that blacks are the only ones who cannot possibly be racists.
There was no "drug deal" between the suffering white kid and his racially charged drug dealers.
I don't see of you Trayvon supporters crying racism here. Zimmerman's case is no more racially motivated than this case.
I actually don't believe this was a crime of civil rights violations any more than Zimmerman's case.
But when someone rears his head up and roars sntich, I have to have sympathy for such a weak mind.
Let's see, the three kids had dope on them. They were on school property. they were criminal in their activity and they are not to be reported to the police or authorities.......................Jesus(Blessed is His Name) what a double standard The black kids had a right to keep the pot dealing at school and not expect not to have the Law applied to them? so much bull(*)(*)(*)(*)...............