Real Freedom Fighters in Syria

There were US troops helping the invasion and expected slaughter cleansing of South Ossetia. The invaders had US weapons.
The USA strongly objected to Russia stopping Sashkavilli's terrorists.
The USA threatened Russia to stop them form finishing off the Sashkavilli terrorists.
The USA sent arms to the defeated Georgians.
The USA loves Sashkavilli

http://mysite.verizon.net/ress8ouv/crocodiletearsovergeorgiaampwhatrussiashouldsay/

Russia cannot afford to let their Mother nation be slaughtered by the brats in America allied with the Saudis and Israelis.
If Syria falls to Talmudic Islamic terrorists, the same thing will be done in Russia.

 

Oh...PLEASE!

Russian Military Equipment is all good and fine if used upon any Non-NATO or American Equipped force.

Russia does not care who rules Syria as long as Russia keeps getting it's royalties from the Gas Pipeline.

AboveAlpha

 

Ivan...there is no doubt that the U.S. will always perform actions that are in it's own best interests as does every other country on Earth.

But really....we could care less about Syria if it was not for the fact Assad started killing his own people wholesale.

AboveAlpha

 

The various US regimes for a long time have not pursued America's interests, but the interests of super-rich greedy looters.

And, regarding Syria, it was the USA in league with the Israelis and Saudis et. al. that sent assassins into Syria to create the image that "Assad started killing his own people wholesale." The USA's excuses for its evil stance against Libya, Egypt and Syria, and Iraq etc. are all based on lies and false flag stunts.

Some guys get so emotionally wrapped up in the party propaganda that they can't see anything except the party line, while others are paid to be blind.

 

Go back to Syria. I cannot imagine anyone in America wants you here. Just go back.

 

Believe me we are NOT soft.

Now people in general living in the U.S. might seem to be soft but what we have always seen and experienced is whenever another country or group has threatened or attacked the U.S. or it's interests....Americans have ALWAYS stood together as one.

Now what some people forget is we were the ones who were attacked on 9/11/01...and our response could have been a great deal more sweeping and violent.

The attack was simply not something that people expected and it was a COWARDLY ACT...as is the manner this enemy fought in Afghanistan....cowardly.

AboveAlpha

 

Syria Girl puts out a lot of good stuff, and that is why I'm commenting on her words quoted below.
When Syrian Girl said "You want to disarm every nation......;" She didn't go far enough. Guys like him want to disarm all nations leaving only one super power to rain down fire from heaven on anyone who objects or doesn't obey.
Thus, in the end, no one is to be allowed nuclear weapons or any other weapon that could jeapardize world wide control by this new superpower.

 

You are wrong.

Iran did not have the technology or the ability to develop Nuclear Tech...thus it signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to BUY reactor tech from Russia.

As Iran signed the NPT...it has given up it's right to create Nuclear Weapons.

Israel did not sign the NPT.

AboveAlpha

 

Iran is a peaceful nation. Iranians are nice and tolerant people. The average Iranian is not obsessed with Israelis or Americans. Much more tolerant than Saudis, Egyptians, Kuwaitis or Qataris.

They do not seek war. USA has surrounded Iran with 59 bases. What they supposed to do? USA has made a bet on radical Sunnis in the region. Shias are at risk everywhere but have shown great patience. They get blown up by suicide bombers everyday in Syria and Iraq, and they do not respond with violence.

 

Really Ivan?

Do you really think with the vast amount of experiences I have had that I could possibly be tricked into believing a lie?

I am well aware what interests the U.S. Protects and I would NEVER allow either myself or my team to take on a...JOB...that was specific to a interest of Corporate Greed...although I am aware sometimes interests overlap.

It is true sometimes U.S. Military actions benefit the large Corps....but most times such Military actions and their outcomes have multiple and overlapping benefits and purposes.

I have been saying all along...the ONLY reason the U.S. is involved in the Middle East is OIL...pure and simple.

Any overlapping interests involving Saudi Arabia, Israel or any other U.S. Ally is a secondary consideration.

AboveAlpha

 

The war on Afghanistan and Iraq was all based on lies. That many so called Americans believed so many lies shows that they are very soft up stairs.

We have already been invaded and don't recognize it while we busily "stand as one" to destroy whole nations for the profits and power of a few super-rich guys.

Americans should heed the warning of US Marine Corps General Smedley Butler:
[video=youtube;F3_EXqJ8f-0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3_EXqJ8f-0 [/video]

 

Iranians are the suicide bombers, not the victims. Same with Syrians. Syria is not peaceful, Iran is not peaceful, Egypt is not peaceful, Libya is not peaceful. Every muslim country is a danger to not only themselves, but to any non-muslim country. Syria and Iran teach their children that Jews are not even human; and they talk about killing every Jew in Israel by pushing them into the sea and drowning them. The biggest threats to the middle east right now are Syria and Iran. They need to be invaded.

 

You have got to be joking!?

She is totally insignificant from any tactical perspective or any other.

AboveAlpha

 

The war in Afghanistan was a necessary attack upon Al-Qaeda and Taliban elements.

The war in Iraq was simply a demonstration of American Military Power and believe me invading just Afghanistan and Iraq was the SMALLEST OR LEAST INVOLVED MILITARY RESPONSE to 9/11 as there were 3 or 4 other plans that were much wider sweeping in their nature.

One plan in particular was a MASSIVE U.S. Military response that would have included the invasions of Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Western Pakistan if need be...and the basing of up to 350,000 U.S. Army and Marine Soldiers in Saudi Arabia.

On a POWER OF APPLIED MILITARY FORCE scale of 1 to 10 this plan was a 4 and the plan that was actually implemented was a 2 on that scale.

There were at least 4 total plans being considered and I only know the details of 3 of them and the 5th plan that I am unsure of whether or not it was being considered was whispered to be an 8 on the scale.

You have to remember that right after 9/11...the people of the United States were in a state of Temporary Blood Lust and Insanity. ANY MILITARY PLAN short of Nuclear Weapons use would have had the American Peoples Blessing and if this EVER happens again the U.S. Military will station MASSIVE NUMBERS OF TROOPS in the Middle East in Saudi Arabia as that is where the majority of the OIL is.

This of course would enrage many in the Muslim World given Saudi Arabia is home to Mecca...but make no mistake....any further terrorist attacks occurring in the U.S. or territories of....the 4th or 5th Plans...which are by design a way that would provide a way to exact EXTREME RETALIATION upon any Countries, Groups or Religious Sects that might be considered Enemies of the United States.

No one has seen the United States perform Military Operations in an ALL OUT WARFARE mode since 1945 and if another 9/11 attack should happen...you can kiss goodbye several Governments and Countries in the Middle East.

AboveAlpha

 

As I have posted before...I have Iranian American friends and this family escaped Iran and immigrated to the U.S. under great duress and hardship.

Their First Born Son who is a Naturalized American Citizen is a member of the U.S. Military and his Mom and Dad are EXTREMELY PROUD of this. The Mom and Dad are also naturalized American Citizens and they have several other children that were born in the U.S.

They found out what I sometimes do and asked a favor of me when their Son was stationed in Iraq as they had not heard from him for some times. This was due to the fact that their son could read, write and speak Farsi so he was a great asset for the U.S. Military that had to deal with the meddling of the Iranian Qud's Force that was supplying SHAPED CHARGED MUNITIONS to the Shiite Insurgents as such Shaped Charged Munitions can cause great damage if used as IED's.

Now over 70% of the entire Iranian Population is 30 years old or younger and is VERY PI$$@# OFF at the Iranian Old Religious Guard. These young Iranian's are hoping their new President will be allowed to follow through on this stated goals to improve relations with the U.S. as they wish to have sanctions lifted.

Whether or not the Old Guard will allow this New Iranian President to improve relations with the U.S. remains to be seen but the reality is as long as Iran continues it's Nuclear Program which is in Violation of International Law as well as Iran is breaking an agreement as it signed the NPT just to be able to BUY Nuclear Tech...Iran will have to give up it's Nuclear Weapons Program in order to get both Sanctions Removed and improve relations with the U.S....which over 70% of all Iranian's would be more than happy to do.

Having a few old style circa...1945 Fission Bombs is not something that would deter the U.S. Military from attacking if it had to.

AboveAlpha

 

And we are supposed to consider the actions of insane people filled with blood lust to be the least bit valid and based on honest and truthful judgments?

And since they, in a state of insanity and blood lust, conducted their wars on Iraq and Afghanistan, the rest of their testimonies and actions are equally condemned as prejudiced and unjust to the present day.

Does Alpha think that what Marine Corps General Smedley Butler discovered is no longer valid?

 

It was a joke that may also be valid, considering that the Talmu-"Muslims" have already started assassinations of Syrians in America.

 

he calls them "Talmudic Muslims".

of course he's joking.

 

Yes he was your laughable anti-Semitic propaganda has been thoroughly debunked by numerous genetic tests, you have been shown this numerous (*)(*)(*)(*)ing times and your only equally ridiculous response is that the JOOZ are behind the studies to which you provide no evidence whatsoever.



1. Atzmon G, Hao L, Pe'er I, Velez C, Pearlman A, Palamara PF, Morrow B, Friedman E, Oddoux C, Burns E, Ostrer H. "Abraham's children in the genome era: major Jewish diaspora populations comprise distinct genetic clusters with shared Middle Eastern ancestry." American Journal of Human Genetics 2010;86(6):850-859, doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.015.

2. Behar DM, Metspalu M, Metspalu E, Rosset S, Parik J, Rootsi S, Chaubey G, Kutuev I, Yudkovsky G, Khusnutdinova EK, Balanovsky O, Semino O, Pereira L, Comas D, Gurwitz D, Bonne-Tamir B, Parfitt T, Hammer MF, Skorecki K, Villems R. "The genome-wide structure of the Jewish people." Nature 2010;466:238-242, doi:10.1038/nature09103.

The competing Rhineland and Khazarian theories were most recently discussed by Ostrer in two studies published in 2012 and in his well received book, Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People. He found that geographically and culturally distant Jews still have more genes in common than they do with non-Jews around them, and that those genes can be traced back to the Levant, an area including modern-day Israel. “All European [Ashkenazi] Jews seem connected on the order of fourth or fifth cousins, Ostrer has said.

The concept of the “Jewish people” remains controversial. The Law of Return, the Israeli law that established the right of Jews around the world to settle in Israel and which remains in force today, was a central tenet of Zionism. The DNA that links Ashkenazi, Sephardi and Mizrahi, three prominent culturally and geographically distinct Jewish groups, could conceivably be used to support Zionist territorial claims —except, as Ostrer has pointed out, some of the same markers can be found in Palestinians, distant genetic cousins of the Jews, as well. Palestinians, understandably, want their own ‘right of return’.

That disagreement over the interpretations of Middle Eastern DNA also pits Jewish traditionalists against a particular strain of secular Jewish ultra-liberals who have joined with anti-Israeli Arabs and many non-Jews to argue for an end to Israel as a Jewish nation. Their hero is the Austrian-born Shlomo Sand—and now Elhaik. His study gained buzz in neo-Nazi websites and radical anti-Israeli and more radical pro-Palestinian blogs. For example, the notorious former Ku Klux Klansman David Duke actually attacked Elhaik in his latest anti-Jewish rant—Duke’s anti-Semitic beliefs hang on the fact that Jews are genetically cohesive and conspiratorial. “The disruptive and conflict-ridden behavior which has marked out Jewish Supremacist activities through the millennia strongly suggests that Jews have remained more or less genetically uniform and have … developed a group evolutionary survival strategy based on a common biological unity — something which strongly militates against the Khazar theory,” Duke wrote in his blog in February.

While Elhaik’s work has provided ideological support for those seeking the destruction of Israel, it’s fallen flat among established scientists, who peer reviewed his work and found it sloppy at best and political at worst.

“He’s just wrong,” said Marcus Feldman of Stanford University, a leading researcher in Jewish genetics. “If you take all of the careful genetic population analysis that has been done over the last 15 years… there’s no doubt about the common Middle Eastern origin,” he said. He added that Elhaik’s paper “is sort of a one-off.”

“It’s an unrealistic premise,” said University of Arizona geneticist Michael Hammer, one of the world’s top Y-chromosomal researchers.

Discover’s Razib Khan did a textured critique in his Gene Expression blog, noting the study’s historical fuzziness and its selective use of data to come up with what seems like a pre-cooked conclusion. As Razib writes, it’s hardly surprising that we would find a small but sizable Khazarian contribution to the “Jewish gene pool”. In fact the male line of my own family traces to the Caucuses, suggesting I’m one of the 20 percent or so of Jews whose lineage traces to converted royal Khazarians. But that view is widely acknowledged by Ostrer, Hammer, Feldman, Michael Thomas and every major researcher in this area—as summarized in my book, Abraham’s Children: Race, Identity and the DNA of the Chosen People.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonenti...l-calls-those-who-disagree-nazi-sympathizers/

Further down in the same article, Haaretz at least mentions that there is another side to what genetics tell us about the origins of European Jews. It refers to the work of Professor Harry Ostrer, who is the author of "The Genetic History of the Jews," a new book also published this year by Oxford University Press. Looking at his credentials, his work should have been at the top of the story. Ostrer served as the director of the Human Genetics Program at New York University School of Medicine, where he worked for more than two decades. Today he is head of genetic testing at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Unlike Elhaik, he does not accept the argument that European Jewry comes from Central Asia but rather he says that Jews around the world can trace their genetic history to the Middle East 2,000 years ago.

http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=3131

Ostrer, Harry. Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People, Oxford University Press, 2012 http://books.google.com.au/books?id=RayZR3V1SFwC&pg=PA26#v=onepage&q&f=false

Haplotypes constructed from Y-chromosome markers were used to trace the paternal origins of the Jewish Diaspora. A set of 18 biallelic polymorphisms was genotyped in 1,371 males from 29 populations, including 7 Jewish (Ashkenazi, Roman, North African, Kurdish, Near Eastern, Yemenite, and Ethiopian) and 16 non-Jewish groups from similar geographic locations. The Jewish populations were characterized by a diverse set of 13 haplotypes that were also present in non-Jewish populations from Africa, Asia, and Europe. A series of analyses was performed to address whether modern Jewish Y-chromosome diversity derives mainly from a common Middle Eastern source population or from admixture with neighboring non-Jewish populations during and after the Diaspora. Despite their long-term residence in different countries and isolation from one another, most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one another at the genetic level. Admixture estimates suggested low levels of European Y-chromosome gene flow into Ashkenazi and Roman Jewish communities. A multidimensional scaling plot placed six of the seven Jewish populations in a relatively tight cluster that was interspersed with Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations, including Palestinians and Syrians. Pairwise differentiation tests further indicated that these Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations were not statistically different. The results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora.


Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypes


...the Y chromosomes in Palestinian Arabs and Bedouin represent, to a large extent, early lineages derived from the Neolithic inhabitants of the area and additional lineages from more-recent population movements. The early lineages are part of the common chromosome pool shared with Jews. According to our working model, the more-recent migrations were mostly from the Arabian Peninsula, as is seen in the Arab-specific Eu 10 chromosomes that include the modal haplotypes observed inPalestinians and Bedouin... The study demonstrates that the Y chromosome pool of Jews is an integral part of the genetic landscape of the region and, in particular, that Jews exhibit a high degree of genetic affinity to populations living in the north of the Fertile Crescent.


The Y Chromosome Pool of Jews as Part of the Genetic Landscape of the Middle East


Both the extent and location of the maternal ancestral deme from which the Ashkenazi Jewry arose remain obscure. Here, using complete sequences of the maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), we show that close to one-half of Ashkenazi Jews, estimated at 8,000,000 people, can be traced back to only 4 women carrying distinct mtDNAs that are virtually absent in other populations, with the important exception of low frequencies among non-Ashkenazi Jews. We conclude that four founding mtDNAs, likely of Near Eastern ancestry, underwent major expansion(s) in Europe within the past millennium.


The Matrilineal Ancestry of Ashkenazi Jewry: Portrait of a Recent Founder
Event


DNA Evidence

Modern DNA studies on the Y chromosome of Jews worldwide have largely disproven the Khazar origin theory for the vast majority of Jews, including the Ashkenazi.

A 1999 study by Hammer et al., published in the Proceedings of the United States National Academy of Sciences compared the Y chromosomes of Ashkenazi, Roman, North African, Kurdish, Near Eastern, Yemenite, and Ethiopian Jews with 16 non-Jewish groups from similar geographic locations. It found that "Despite their long-term residence in different countries and isolation from one another, most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one another at the genetic level... The results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora."[50] According to Nicholas Wade "The results accord with Jewish history and tradition and refute theories like those holding that Jewish communities consist mostly of converts from other faiths, or that they are descended from the Khazars, a medieval Turkish tribe that adopted Judaism."[51]

A 2001 study by Nebel et al. found Haplogroup R1a chromosomes (called Eu 19 in the paper), which are very frequent in Eastern European populations (54%-60%), at elevated frequency (12.7%) in Ashkenazi Jews. The authors hypothesized that these chromosomes could reflect low-level gene flow into Ashkenazi populations from surrounding Eastern European populations, or, alternatively, that both the Ashkenazi Jews in Haplogroup R1a, and to a greater extent all Eastern European populations in general, might have some partial Khazar ancestry.[52]

A 2003 study of the Y-chromosome by Behar et al. found that among Ashkenazi Levites, who comprise approximately 4% of Ashkenazi Jews, the prevalence of Haplogroup R1a1 was over 50%. This haplogroup is uncommon in other Jewish groups, but found in high frequencies in eastern European populations. They argued that "it is likely that the event leading to a high frequency of R1a1 NRYs within the Ashkenazi Levites involved very few, and possibly only one, founding father." They postulated that one likely source of the gene was a "a founder(s) of non-Jewish European ancestry, whose descendents were able to assume Levite status", and that an alternate "attractive source would be the Khazarian Kingdom, whose ruling class is thought to have converted to Judaism in the 8th or 9th century." They concluded that "Although neither the NRY haplogroup composition of the majority of Ashkenazi Jews nor the microsatellite haplotype composition of the R1a1 haplogroup within Ashkenazi Levites is consistent with a major Khazar or other European origin, as has been speculated by some authors (Baron 1957; Dunlop 1967; Ben-Sasson 1976; Keys 1999), one cannot rule out the important contribution of a single or a few founders among contemporary Ashkenazi Levites."[53]

A 2005 study by Nebel et al., based on Y chromosome polymorphic markers, showed that Ashkenazi Jews are more closely related to other Jewish and Middle Eastern groups than to their local neighbouring populations in Europe. However, 11.5% of male Ashkenazim were found to belong to Haplogroup R1a1 (R-M17), the dominant Y chromosome haplogroup in Eastern Europeans, suggesting possible gene flow between the two groups. The authors hypothesized that "R-M17 chromosomes in Ashkenazim may represent vestiges of the mysterious Khazars". They concluded "However, if the R-M17 chromosomes in Ashkenazi Jews do indeed represent the vestiges of the mysterious Khazars then, according to our data, this contribution was limited to either a single founder or a few closely related men, and does not exceed ~ 12% of the present-day Ashkenazim.[54]

A 2010 study on Jewish ancestry by Atzmon et al. says "Two major groups were identified by principal component, phylogenetic, and identity by descent (IBD) analysis: Middle Eastern Jews and European/Syrian Jews. The IBD segment sharing and the proximity of European Jews to each other and to southern European populations suggested similar origins for European Jewry and refuted large-scale genetic contributions of Central and Eastern European and Slavic populations to the formation of Ashkenazi Jewry."[55]


Genetic studies on Ashkenazi Jewery

 

What I consider valid is the reality that if a person or group is looking for Blood....they find it.

AboveAlpha

 

?

Assad fighting Al Qaeda and Foreign backed jihadists

 

Your so-called " DNA evidence" is Crap and aint ever gonna turn into chocolate cake .All you've come up with is reams on more crap from Jewish pro-Zionist sources Carried out by Zionists and Funded by Zionists ..

"He who pays the piper calls the tune "

Jesus was NOT a Jew

"Christians have been duped by the unholiest hoax in all history, by so-called Jews. This is considered their most effective weapon."

"This 'big lie' technique is brainwashing United States Christians into believing that Jesus Christ was "King of the Jews", in the sense that so-called 'Jews' today call themselves 'Jews'. This reference was first made in English translations of the Old and New Testaments, centuries before the so-called Jews highjacked the word 'Jew' in the 18th century A.D. to palm themselves off on the Christian world as having a kinship with Jesus Christ. This alleged kinship comes from the myth of their common ancestry with the so-called 'Jews' of the Holy Land in the Old Testament history, a fiction based on fable."

"American Christians little suspect they are being brainwashed twenty-four hours of every day over television and radio, by newspapers and magazines, by motion pictures and plays, by books, by political leaders in office and seeking office, by religious leaders in their pulpits and outside their churches, by leaders in the field of education inside and outside their curricular activities, and by all leaders in business, professions and finance, whose economic security demands that they curry the favor of so-called "Jews" of historic Khazar ancestry. Unsuspecting Christians are subjected to this barrage from sources they have little reason to suspect. Incontestable facts supply the unchallengeable proof of the historic accuracy that so-called "Jews" throughout the world today of eastern European origin are unquestionably the historic descendants of the Khazars, a pagan Turko-Finn ancient Mongoloid nation deep in the heart of Asia, according to history, who battled their way in bloody wars about the 1st century B.C. into eastern Europe where they set up their Khazar kingdom. For some mysterious reason the history of the Khazar kingdom is conspicuous by its absence from history courses in the schools and colleges.

"The historic existence of the Khazar kingdom of so-called "Jews", their rise and fall, the permanent disappearance of the Khazar kingdom as a nation from the map of Europe, and how King Bulan and the Khazar nation in about 740 A.D. became so-called "Jews" by conversion, were concealed from American Christians by censorship imposed by so-called "Jews", of historic Khazar ancestry, upon all U.S.A. media of mass communications directed by them. Then in 1945 this author gave nation-wide publicity to his many years intensive research into the "facts of life" concerning Khazars. The disclosures were sensational and very effective but apparently angered so-called "Jews" who have continued to vent their spleen upon this author since then solely for that reason. Since 1946 they have conducted a vicious smear campaign against him, seeking thus to further conceal these facts, for obvious reasons. What have they to fear from the truth?

"In an original 1903 edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia in New York's Public Library, and in the Library of Congress, Volume IV, pages 1 to 5 inclusive, appears a most comprehensive history of the Khazars. Also in the New York Public Library are 327 books by the world's greatest historians and other sources of reference, in addition to the Jewish Encyclopedia, dealing with Khazar history, and written between the 3rd A.D. and 20th centuries by contemporaries of the Khazars and by modern historians on that subject."

Jesus was a 'Judean', not a Jew.

During His lifetime, no persons were described as "Jews" anywhere. That fact is supported by theology, history and science. When Jesus was in Judea, it was not the "homeland" of the ancestors of those who today style themselves "Jews".

. In none of the manuscripts of the original Old or New Testament was Jesus described or referred to as a "Jew". The term originated in the late eighteenth century as an abbreviation of the term Judean and refers to a resident of Judea without regard to race or religion, just as the term "Texan" signifies a person living in Texas.


In spite of the powerful propaganda effort of the so-called "Jews", they have been unable to prove in recorded history that there is one record, prior to that period, of a race religion or nationality, referred to as "Jew".
The religious sect in Judea, in the time of Jesus, to which self-styled "Jews" today refer to as "Jews", were known as "Pharisees". "Judaism" today and "Pharisaism" in the time of Jesus are the same.

Jesus abhorred and denounced "Pharisaism"; hence the words, "Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites, Ye Serpents, Ye Generation of Vipers".
======

......majority of modern day "Jews" - East Europeans are infact Yids, whose language was Yiddish.
The Ancient biblical Hebrew tribes long ago disappeard /assimilated with other nations/peoples , Canaanites/Persians/Khazars + other Europeans - descendents of Mamzers etc.

=====

 

Here's an easy lesson ; Sit back , watch - listen and learn :

[video=youtube;nQXlaaNDoW0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQXlaaNDoW0&list=PLE1B2ECCE299F2C1F&index=1[/video]

.....

 

3rd Battalion, 504th Parachute Infantry

 

I do not care or want to know who you are. Stop insulting the Syrian Army and their soldiers. Misconduct by some soldiers does not mean you have a right to paint all the soldiers with a broad brush and call them criminals. I can show you thousands of incidents where American GI's also broke rules and committed crimes while on deployments. There are Amnesty International reports about atrocities committed by the U.S. servicemembers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Don't give me the nonsense about Syrian soldiers being sent out by a murderous regime to kill people. Iraqi and Vietnamese people also can make that argument to the U.S. Government and U.S. Military. Just because we are American does not make us right and them the bad guys. We were sent there not to spread freedom but to fill the bank accounts of the already rich politicians and bankers. We were also sent there just because George W. Bush had a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein.

Syrian Army has performed admirably in the conditions for which they were not ready for. What they are fighting is a massive insurgency in all areas of the country. To fight against your countrymen is never easy for any army. That is in addition to the massive recruitment of foreigners into Syria from all corners of the world. Syrian troops are not paid so calling them paid assassins is highly offensive. They are conscripted soldiers and we all know the problems coming from that, it was evident during the Vietnam War. You want to know which country has used paid assassins and death squads? The U.S. has used them. We have the worlds largest number of PMC's and U.S. has been known to operate death squads in various conflicts. So lets look in the mirror before we start condemning those Syrian conscripts.