Why are white people pro-diversity?

Even so, I think America is a LOT more racist these days, than any of those nations. Still, it is not accurate/fair to compare them to the U.S.A.

 

of course not.

The USA isn't a nation-state, like Ireland, Germany, France, Germany, Denmark is.

 

And due to our particular history... we have some unique yet profound problems where it concerns ethnic relations overall.

 

these problems were self-created and self-inflicted.

we own them.

 

It's all there, in our history. Some people don't care for considering that.

 

I think your a racist.

 

Yea, from slaverly. You want to continue to own that atrocity?

 

I think that Whites are losing ground because they aren't having enough children. That's the factual explanation and it is self-explanatory. You White Supremacists should stop moaning about the non-Whites and start having bigger families and try encouraging other Whites to have bigger families. Problem solved.

 

That is a common conservative argument. Funny how they only use it when it benefits them.

The conservative vitriol to liberals goes like this "your policies and laws shall not infrange on my freedoms."

By the same token, one person's bigotry shall not infringe one's rights as a minority.

I will not tolerate blacks taking over.
I will not tolerate gays walking among us.
I will not tolerate spanish-speaking immigrants using their native language.
I will not tolerate people having sex and getting abortions on my dime.
I will not tolerate killing of life through abortions.
I will not tolerate Muslim Americans walking among us.
I will not tolerate a non-white Miss America, that is not right.
I will not tolerate our president being Black.

Hypocrisy.

 

It pains me to know that one day an extraterrestrial will read this thread, and this forum in general. No wonder they fly right past us.

- - - Updated - - -

Well, that actually means that they would have to leave their parents basement, lick the Cheeto stains off of their fingers, and interact with other people.

 

Look. You can change culture within a generation. You can change religion or nationality in matters of weeks. Now if you got children with anything but a Caucasian your children will be anything but a nordic blonde forever and ever ( blondness is rare and recessive to darker genotype )
I lived in india and there the more white you are the more liked you would be. Especially ladies. that what 3000 year of western civilisation broughts.

Dont call that diversity. You are a soldier doing your work for the global melt so we can all be unrotted mixed consumers. That what you are expected to be.

 

lol, sure destroy the economy and then blame the next guy for it... got it

 

I think you might actually have a part of a good point. Diversity doesn't seem to mean anything, or at least anything important in this thread. So far it's defined as skin color and food. "Yeah, I love tacos! Go diversity!"

It's really more than one group of people doing things that other groups either don't like or find inconvenient. But we like to paper over that and talk about tans and take out Chinese food.

 

I'm jealous, I lived in Westchester county and used to frequent the city often. The best food in the country is served in NYC, that is just my opinion.

 

we always will

WHITE people allowed slavery to flourish in the USA.

WHITE people allowed Segregation to flourish in the USA.

we now own the results.

 

I'm am conservative, yet have none of those beliefs. Most of my friends are conservative, and they share none of those beliefs.

 

Which White people? My ancestors came from Sicily, and we barely owned socks. As I recall it was North against the South, and so doesn't that eliminate northern Whites from your equation of guilt? Let's see now . . . snap! Every former slave owner is now dust in the wind. So now who do you point a trembling finger of guilt at?

Finally in a return to Whites are guilty of (fill-in-the-blank) recently leftwingers decreed that all brown skin toned Hispanics are now White. So are they also guilty?

 

Segregation ended in the mid-70s.

 

With exactly the same inherent problems of assigning guilt. You'd best get cracking coming up with specific names of the guilty people along with a reasonable justification for that assignment other than "They were alive at the time and their melanin count was low."

 

If the Jews can sue for Holocaust damages 68 years after the Holocaust ended, blacks can talk about the legacy of Segregation 38 years after it ended.

 

Some white people.

Were I to move the US I sure wouldn't be guilty for slavery and segregation just because I share the skin colour of those that are guilty.

- - - Updated - - -

some blacks and sue some whites yes, but to assign victimhood and guilt based on race is just silly.

 

Yep and Whites can also argue with them. It's a great big, glorious circle of life sort of thing.

 

how would you assign victimhood?

 

I'd say that the the people who actually suffered from segregation, and perhaps those whose forefathers did, should be compensated. Not all black people suffered from segregation, so why give victimhood to all blacks?

 

Well there's a bit of a logistics problem there because people passed over because they lived in regions that did not endorse segregation might just howl about discrimination. On the other hand if one were to give every Black (for a given degree of Blackness one presumes) a million dollars each for all the anguish they have suffered then that just might tick off the survivors of the Japanese internment camps who got nowhere near as much in compensation and would really tick off the Native-American population. So it's tricky.