Method one Deny to women access to education, contraception, abortion and the choice of whether to marry or not. This is the favourite technique in the third world, ensuring families of more than six and later on - desperate unemployed men crossing the Rio Grande or drowning in the Mediterranean sea. Metod two This is greatly loved by economists, and is the basis of modern western capitalism. You allow the above in creating an uncotrolled influx of 'illegal' immigrants and reducing the wages of the low birth indigenous suckers to that of the third world. And by happy chance, at the present moment, these ecomomic slaves have a darker skin than the indigenous and so the Liberal Capitalists can brand any objection to this flow as 'Racist'.
Does it not? Tell it to the gosts of the people who died crossing the Sahara yesterday. Still if it makes you happy shove it elsewhere - I'm trying to spread myself a bit!
Abortion isn't by any means even close to a human right, It kills another human being, nobody has a right to murder. Also I know a woman who has ten children is a college professor. Point being having a family doesn't enslave you.
Please engage brain when replying on such an important issue. Your college professor presumably can afford the upkeep of ten children ( including the slave wages of the third word woman who actually looks after them. ) Now try to immagine what happens if EVERY family 'decides' to have ten children. Go visit Africa and the Caribbean, there you will find vast numbers of young UNEMPLOYED males sizeing you up as a possible rich white target. Alternatly go to the muslim world. Thre you will find the same excess of young UNEMPLOYED males involved in Holy Jihad. Try to see the world as a whole and the easily avoidable disasters that are brewing.
She doesn't have any kind of maid, just a loving husband and children responsible enough to baby sit. Also you should visit China. Why?you will find they lack the future population to support their elderly. Go to Europe and you will find that it to is full of young jihadists too, because the Europeans subscribed to your view. The worlds problem isn't people having too many children it's us not having enough. ie. Wouldn't you feel more comfortable with more Americans too have your back?
God help me I'm on one of those forums! Margot2 has fooled me. Try to use yor BRAIN don't conflate different outcomes together. There are three quite different cases: (1) One child families the norm in Europe and Anglo Saxons world-wide. This was forceably introduced in China in order to bring its standard of living in line with America. It is far easier to obtain this when the population of China equals that of the USA. Now the Capitalists have taken over in China they are reversing this since capitalism only works with dirt poor cheap labour. Have you any idea what the demands of an expanding Chinese population are going to make on the FINITE natural resources of the world? The truth is that all the demands for extra energy and 'Global Warming' are brought about by the uncontrolled birthrate of Latin America, Sub-saharan Africa,the Muslim World and the Indian Sub-continent. (2) If you want a stable poulation you can easily obtain this - by the use of family allowances- by encouraging the average women to have two children. NOTE THE ALLOWANCES ARE FOR TWO CHILDREN ONLY - PROFESSIONAL BREEDERS NEED NOT APPLY. (3)The world you are talking about of families of ten or more is the disaster that is the Third World and there no one can afford to look after the elderly they just die at a relatevely early age! By the way Anglo Saxon America is not expanding in poulation it is CONTRACTING. All that is happening is that Greater Mexico is being created. At a rough guess your college friend is a recent immigrant, still not - or unwilling, to adapt to the norms of the host country. If all this sounds FASCIST to you then it sums up the number of neurones in your head and their connection.
1) Obviously the Chinese attempts are failing miserable, their average worker is still horribly off. Second of they are beginning to have enormous euthanasia because they cannot afford to feed their elderly.Our resources are actually 100% recyclable, because atoms don't cease to exist. Also we do have more than enough resources to feed an expanding Chinese population, since we would only need food, which at this point is by no means finite. 2) actually in order to have a stable population you need a birthrate of 2.1 not two. Also who wants a "stable" population. Our species is supposed to grow bigger because it ensures less chance of dying out altogether. 3)That's because those countries are completely underdeveloped, not that they have too many kids. Also my point was Anglo Saxon America should expand in population, then we might not have such an immigration problem. And no she is not an immigrant. Pugno pro veritas.
(1) So the chinese worker is going to be better off competing with more desperate people. Ask the Chinese in the cities how they feel about more immigrants from the countryside. But you would not understand this, although you will strenuously deny this, you come from a class that has never had to compete for meanial work - your Latin Tag gives you away. Food is very much finite - the huge increases in prices we are seeing particularly in meat is the result of population increase plus the transfer of manufacturing from the west to the east giving them the ability to buy a western diet. (2) I will not argue that you need more than 2 for a stable population although the exact number will depend on the society. I would think it an excellent idea if we died out or at least reduced our population to that of hunter/gathers. We are destroying the world and the other creatures who live in it. (3) But why are they undeveloped? they have been 'developing' ever since WWII - every gain is wiped out by the ever increasing population. All developed nation have a low birthrare thats why they are developed. Anglo Saxon women prefer to live a decent life of independence and opportunity than become baby machines. I suspect that neither you or your college friend are Anglo Saxons.
Where have you been in the Muslim world? You know a person from Bangladesh or Ethiopia or Sudan can earn ten times what they would earn in their own country.
That is the whole B****Y point - precisely because of the high birth rate there are TEN PEOPLE FOR EVERY JOB. Wages are set by how low the employer can offer a wage and still get someone willing to do the job. You will begin to understand this as America becomes more like Mexico ( which is the intention of the American Capitalists ) with a Latino type birthrate. Why won't you give your opinion on Japan and the nuclear bomb?
I don't know much about Japan. The birth rate in Saudi Arabia has been going down for over a decade.. and they are sending ex-pat workers back to their own countries.
