Go do the dance with one of your team mates, boss. I'm not interested tonight. Punch out, and go home.
I think you have that backasswards. It's Twoofers who marginalize those who were murdered and those who responded on Sept 11 with their lies of no-planes, controlled demolition...low-level nukes....Not one of which holds any water. You people do nothing more than contribute to the dumbing down of our country.
"Not one of which holds any water." Have you looked at NIST - NCSTAR 1A page 46 ponder the implications of that bit ...... Have a nice day : )
The fall of WTC7 for 2.25 sec of said fall, does so at a rate of acceleration indistinguishable from the acceleration of GRAVITY. Therefore since the building keeps its shape as it falls, there can only be one conclusion, and that is, there was NO resistance under the falling mass, that is ALL of the resistance had to have been removed and ALL at the same time. That is obviously Controlled Demolition .....
No resistance under the falling mass for 2.25 seconds ... OR it was being pulled down by the mass below it at an accelerated rate. From the same page, Note what happened immediately following the 2.25 seconds and throughout the remainder of the collapse.
If this was a gravity driven "collapse" event as asserted by the mainstream media, then it is IMPOSSIBLE that any other bits within the structure could cause the building to fall at 9.8 m/s^2 by pulling down on the falling bit in order to effectively crush the structure under the falling mass(?) Lets get real here..... there is this weird theory being floated that the Penthouse dropped through the already gutted building and through some sort of hocus-pokus / black magic & witchcraft, the falling penthouse caused the North & West walls of WTC7 to thus descend at 9.8 m/s^2 ..... NONE of that has any foundation in real science. if something is falling at free fall acceleration, it means that there isn't any resistance under it. very simple and the 2.25 sec of free fall, indicates clearly that this was NOT a "collapse" but rather a well organized demolition of WTC7.
In other words, you have no rebuttal to my last & so invoke whatever handle you can in order to avoid having to admit that WTC7 is proven to be Controlled Demolition and therefore proves the case that somebody perpetrated a FALSE FLAG ( what .... the GOV? ) or?
No I just get tired of how fast threads on this forum go off track. But if you must know, because the internal structure in WTC7 had already been collapsing for 8 seconds before the facade began to fall, the falling debris inside the building aided in accelerating the facade faster than it would normally. Combined with the fact that the facade (basically an empty shell at this point) would provide negligible resistance, the 2.25 seconds of gravitational acceleration is not abnormal in the slightest. It is certainly far from proof of controlled demolition. WTC7's collapse has been explained for years, you must be a bit slow on the pick up. [video=youtube;BV7TPvk__kE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BV7TPvk__kE[/video]
So it just happened that chaotic fires caused the neat & tidy gutting of the building and then in sequence the penthouse collapses down and on its descent, it helps the north & west walls of the building to descend at 9.8 m/s^2 and all the while crushing, bending, deforming, pushing out of the way structure that was under the falling bit so as to cause the observed result ..... is that what had to have happened?
No. The back wall just stood there while the interior of the building collapsed inward and then tipped over when there was nothing left to hold it up. Anybody with a brain can figure that out. - - - Updated - - - Come up with a recording of demolition charges or admit that there is no proof of demolition.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2XLyY8RG28 38:43 (you can also hear shattered glass): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwfyM0AiXOA&list=FLZ-WQxZFOYjggN3AyaONMXQ#t=2323
No,not even.....you need to prove those sounds were 'demolition charges' or even explosions at all...
None of those sounded the least bit like a demolition charge. The sound has long been known to have been doctored on the phone booth video. Nothing here. Actually, no. And Shafquat's head goes "Klunkety-klunk" when she walks. Stupid bimbo thinks that the dust from the collapse is something magical that we have never seen before. This is just the same dust that form from gravity busting up concrete in an actual demolition, whether by conventional CD or verinage. There is just a lot more of it because they did not remove the drywall before the buildings came down. Gypsum pulverizes a lot more easily and thoroughly than concrete.
we have paid shill here that troll the forum night and day posting lie after lie ignoring facts in videos never taking the time to watch them .they know as well as we do it was an inside job.the ones that are in denial,they leave and dont come back.thats how you can tell the different in the two who dont think the government could do it.
