Hilary Clinton has historic lead over Joe Biden for WH election 2016.

Oh yeah... your fictitious "stand down" order. Good luck with that.

 

At this point, what difference does it make?

 

I agree with you on that on. She is a much better candidate than Hillary. I'm just glad the left isn't smart enough to know that.

 

Hillary Clinton was ahead of the polls before, then that unknown upstart Obama beat everyone in the race for president. It could happen again. Who knows?

 

BestViewedwithcable 1

Pardy 0

 

Romney was a poor candidate but would have been a pretty good President.

Obama was a great candidate and a very poor President.

Unfortunately, too many voters were not able to make that distinction.

 

Actually in 2012 Obama was not a great candidate. But you don't need to be all that sharp when you KNOW that the bulk of the Mainstream Media has got your back . . . along with the IRS and when Bill Clinton himself is pretty much carrying you on his shoulders.

With the exception of the IRS, Hillary will be enjoying the same advantages should she run in 2016. Um . . . that is assuming that the MSM doesn't fall for another ultra-lightweight, far Left, zero meaningful national experience, passing fad political rock star -- again -- after having reassured her and Bill that, "This time it's for real Hillary and Bill. This time we will back you all the way. We will never lose focus again and go running after another shallow leftwing candidate with -- Look squirrel!"

Ah well . . . the political life is fraught with uncertainties.

 

Funny, but the MSM and the Dem Leadership and most DEM party voters were pretty much saying the same things about Hillary prior to Barack Obama entering the primaries and all those sober pundits and journalists started getting leg tingling Obamagasms. Sort of like the ultimate "Look, squirrel!" moment in politics. So what if yet another super-lightweight, all image and no substance political rock star candidate shows up on the Left once again when Hillary is just about finished kicking every other challenger's arse in the primaries? Dem voters and leftwing journalists and pundits don't seem to have a good record of sticking by her side whenever a new and glittering object shows up.

 

So Cheney not running admits total failue then??

 

But both oboobma and Hillary are absolute piles of (*)(*)(*)(*), so who would even consider voting for either one of them?????

 

Half of the chronically non-thinking nation of voters . . . you know the low information crowd that voted for Obama in 2012?

 

THIS GUY... RIGHT HERE...

...just summed up the entire Democratic 2016 campaign strategy and why nobody should fall for it.

 

Romney for fixing financial issues would have been amazing. I also don't think he would have been the slimebag that Barack Obama has become with his Justice Department, attacks on the states, use of the IRS, etc...

I can't speak to the rest of his capabilities.