Faith based bill would OK doctors denying care to gays and single mothers

Bullcrap. I doubt any doctor would care if a person is gay or not. Most doctors I know are professional enough to not let that interfere with taking care of their patients even if they disagree with their perverted lifestyle.

 

How is that harm? Knowledge is harm according to you? That really explains why conservatives like you are trying to destroy critical thinking in schools here in Texas.

Yay! Another Rightwinger who can't tell the difference between consensual sex between adults and someone raping a child. I really hope you don't have kids. You might confuse them with adults and (*)(*)(*)(*) them on accident.

Why would anyone have to explain this issue to their kids? What the (*)(*)(*)(*) does NAMBLA have to do with 99.999% of homosexuals? (*)(*)(*)(*)ing nothing!

Knowledge =/= harm.

I'm really sorry that you think increasing knowledge equals hurting people.

 

Well, I was wrong... Another gold medal from the angry wasp country club...

 

I explained on the previous page. Go look. Or continue to be ignorant.

 

It's always a good idea to not be honest with your doctor.

 

How dare you bring up a real life example and express a moral opinion other than complete acceptance for homosexuality! You must be burned!

The medical clause could be easily fixed but the pro gay folks can't understand this would never have happened if they hadn't run a bakery out of business in one state and a wedding photographer in another. Their fascism in forcing acceptance on everyone is fueling this.

 

All I saw was rambling. Again, if you have noting to support your silly beliefs then you shouldn't embarrass yourself like that.

 

Do I have to embarrass you now by reposting?

 

The examples you gave are rather dishonest. Those incidents have never happened that I'm aware of---teachers refusing to teach. Doctors not caring for single mothers. Doesn't seem to be a problem in our society. I think what the bill is perhaps trying to do is to protect those people who don't want to participate in something they deem wrong. Like giving contreception to a 12 year old or putting together flower arrangements for a gay marriage ceremony.

 

Repost away....you will see I am not easily embarrassed. Besides you got nothing. There is no logic to back you.

 

Or serving blacks or jews...

 

That's pretty funny, considering you're the one who wants to impose your "morality" on Christian health providers.

Because that would be free exercise of the atheist's religion, you mean?

 

It's not the job of doctor to judge morality. Their job is to help people in need, all people. They take an oath on that.

 

And who are you to decide what is harmless for other people's children to know about? Are you the parent?

You must accept the fact that NAMBLA is a part of your gay rights movement, thanks to your gay hero Harry Hay, who was a cornerstone of the gay rights movement and who publicly supported NAMBLA. I know that it bothers you gays immensely because you continue to try to distance yourselves from the man-boy love organization. Man = male. Boy = male. Man-boy love = male-male love = GAY.

NAMBLA is a gay organization. Period.

Then you won't mind the fact that I am not the only parent out there that is teaching their children that homosexuality and pedophilia are the same thing. It's a sick and disgusting lifestyle that must be taught out of society, right? Because increasing knowledge does not harm children, right?

 

Oh, yeah, you got factual evidence to back that up? Because to reasonable people, it sounds like you're talking out of your ass and pretending your bigoted beliefs are substantiated by scientific evidence.

Unsubstantiated opinion.

They do? Must they also explain how some straight men and women like to have sex with children too?

Nobody is deciding what is moral to your child, that's a total red herring. What Questerr asked you was how it harms them in some tangential and substantive way.

 

Well I don't see any reposting so the only one embarrassed here is you.

 

Can you demonstrate how knowledge of homosexuality is harmful?

No, I don't have to accept your false equivalence that rape is equal to consensual sex. Because it is a lie.

And the Lord's Resistance Army and Army of God are Christian organizations. Should we base our policies towards Christians off what those two groups do?

Teaching hatred is objectively harmful.

 

I was on my way home from work. Here you go:

 

You forgot Westboro. They're "christians" too.

 

Hahaha! I have been going to doctors regularly for several years and not once did one ask me if I was into perverted sex. Your flawed logic only embarrasses you further.

 

Did they ask you who makes medical decisions for you in case you can't? Would that person happen to be a spouse?

BTW, I'm 46. I've seen seeing doctors a long time too.

 

Because homosexuality is only about sex?

Here's a clue: you could be 100% celibate and virgin and still be homosexual.

 

Not the doctor and not when I was single. How sad you have to invent scenarios to try and salvage yourself from further embarrassment.

 

This is a pretty bad idea. Some refusals of service to gay people are more legitimate than others, for example, the wedding photographers who felt that their freedom of speech was implicated. Trying to extend this idea to things like medical services is only going to hurt the cause of religious freedom.

 

Hahaha! Come on, please remember we are in the real world.