Mulsims at it again: Muslims want to ban Katy Perry music video

https://www.tytnetwork.com/2014/02/25/muslims-want-ban-katy-perry-video/

There is a video with further explanation. Not that I give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about Katy Perry (not even remotely my style of music), but this is a bit silly. A petition to remove a a video from YouTube? LOL How hard is it to simply.. uh... not watch the video? Seems this Muslims have too much time on their hands, and are awefully thin skinned.

If God is Omnipotent, and Omnipresent, then why sign a petition? Would God just take care of it? Those damn shoelaces!

 

If I was going to care, I'd need some reason to believe that the petition didn't in fact originate from the PR team of her record company (there are millions of idiots on the internet you can get to "sign" pretty much anything). I trust mainstream Muslims much more than I do the mainstream "music" industry.

 

ditto!

 

Thousands of Christians are being persecuted by Muslim radicals in the Middle East. I think I would like to start a petition. Peaceful Muslims are blown up by Islamic fundamentalists, yet they would rather petition Katy Perry. Give me a break! Why is it that these moderate Muslims are so complicit when these radical Muslims take over? Yeah, the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful, I get that. But all it ever seems to take is a tiny minority.

Cool video though!

 

Judging by your siggy, it is apparent that you like to pontificate. "There is no love in fear"? says who, you?
If only people like yourself actually knew what love and fear is.
Your concept of God, love, fear, among other things is only YOUR perception of it.

 

Why do you sit on your Christian hands when muslim children of Abraham are being bombed, have their door kicked in and murdered, have their dead bodies pissed on, quran burned, woman raped, and mosques bombed by drones?

You only seem to give a fuk when its one of yours that die.

 

Actually, Maynard says there is no love in fear.

From the Book of AEnima, Chapter of Pu(*)(*)(*)(*):
If, when I say I might fade like a sigh if I stay here
You minimize my movement anyway
I must persuade you another way

Pushing and shoving and pushing and shoving and pushing me

There's no love in fear!

Staring down the hole again
Hands are on my back again
Survival is my only friend
Terrified of what may come

 

Take it up with Obama if you don't like it, lmao

 

. Yes, Islam seems totalitarian in nature. As does Atheism.....which has a hard time dealing with perspectives not their own. You might say....peas in a pod.

 

Those are mostly isolated incidents. Also, you will always have collateral damage in war. Mosques become targets when they are being used as human shields for terrorists. Unlike the Islamic radicals who are destroying their own kind, America is over there fighting to protect Muslims from other Muslims. There is hardly a comparison between terrorists that through acid in girls faces for trying to receive an education and a just power recognized as such by the international community going after those responsible.

 

sadly, this is what many americans have been conditioned to believe. As far from the truth as you wish.

 

we better let em do it r they may attack anohter U.S. Embassy.......;-}

 

the video is basically the equivalent of muslims burning flags of america, katy perry burns allah, pbuh. yet americans wet their knickers at that sight but dismiss katy perry's iconography.

 

alah isn't fireproof? what a mess!

 

Peas in a pod.

 

No comparison. There is a difference between protesting and ...communicating your opinion....vs banning something so no one else can read or listen to it because it is not of your opinion. Shutting down opinion and thought and free speech is not a Christian problem. And if you say its an "equal" problem with Christians and Muslims then I don't know what to tell you. Perhaps its helpful to ignore what happens when a country becomes majority muslim.

 

there is plenty of censorship on the internet, never mind the mainstream media in the west. many an activist gets shut down in the west its just that they open again you think it never faced any censorship. Look at the pirates of music and film for an easy definition, never mind the political activists.

 

Well, it actually is true. And i have actually been over there, thank you very much. The Taliban had no qualms about blowing up a school and telling everyone we did it. We train the ANA and ANP so they could better defend themselves against terrorist attacks. Protecting peaceful Muslims from the violent ones is part of the whole "hearts and minds" strategy. You're not going to win the war over there if you don't win the hearts and minds over the Taliban.

 

ah, so its a conspiracy against america. ok, fair enough. So tell me, how did america become so righteous since they kidnapped 18 million so-called afrikans and used them as free labour for 400 years?

 

from 6/2009

Xians banning stuff? no way !

 

Who said anything about conspiracy theories? By giving a practical reason, not moral one for being nice to Muslims in the Middle East, I don't know what makes you think I was claiming America to be so righteous. Why are you bringing slavery into this? Virtually ever western nation was involved in the slave trade. The Europeans on the other hand did a lot worse than the Americans regarding the treatment of blacks. Do I even really need to mention England's rampant colonialism on that continent?

 

but

they ALL ended up in america and were held captive for 400 years by americans. Thus, americans have zero, no moral high ground or authority when it comes to peace on earth. Therefore, all of your bs about caring for other cultures is exactly that, BS and we know it.

 

If by America you mean the U.S. then this statement is ridiculously inaccurate. The U.S. declared it's independence from England in 1776 and banned what you call the kidnapping of afrikans in 1807. That's 31 years not 400. Of course for the first 8 years of that 31 the U.S. was pretty busy fighting a war against the super power who started and maintained the slave trade in what would become the U.S. The U.S. constitution which competed the transformation from a British colony was ratified in 1788. So that makes it only 19 years (not 400) that the U.S. actually condoned the international slave trade. Just 73 years later the U.S. would fight a bloody civil war to end that disgusting institution completely. Isn't it interesting that slavery still continues in Africa which is over 150 years after the civil war ended? Please, 400 years? Give me a break!

And btw, there isn't a singe U.S. citizen alive who had anything to do with what you want to hold them morally responsible for. To blame someone for what their great great grandparents did is morally disgusting and you aught to be ashamed of yourself!

 

I'm not even responsible for what my own mother and father do, even if they do it this very second. A social/secular version of 'original sin' is no more rational than the Christian version peddled by a fundy.

- - - Updated - - -

Stop accusing me and other Americans of moral atrocities we never committed. Try living in the present. Slavery ended 148 years ago.

 

Oooops! I stand corrected.