Races Aren't Superior But Cultures Are

mayan civilization is the youngest of all the civilizations you mentioned...

Just because you read it on the internet doesn't mean it's true...aliens? Atlantis? Its all fantasy you're not getting that from real historians or archeologists...

 

I've seen nothing in the history of mankind on earth that would lead one to the conclusion that aliens were responsible. The history of our world includes many examples of civilizations that have declined, their technological accomplishments often being lost for centuries afterwards. The legend of Atlantis for instance may only be legend from the standpoint or its name. Quite a number of historians and archaeologists now believe Atlantis was actually Minoan civilization. The Minoans constructed multiple-story "apartment: houses, possessed indoor plumbing in many cases, and had highly developed arts and trade. That more than 4,000 years ago. Minoan civilization was destroyed, most likely the result of volcanic eruptions on and near the island of Santorini. The cultural advancements of Minoan civilization were mostly lost and forgotten until centuries later when the technologies were rediscovered.

 

possibly too much is centered on minoans...the entire Aegean and a good portion would've been eastern Mediterranean wouldve been hit with the tsunami that ripped the center out of santorini, potentially hundreds of seaside communities being destroyed by the sea...then there is santorini itself, if any inhabitants survived to return they would find the center of their island gone, replaced by the sea and other parts buried under meters of volcanic debris...

 

First of all, you're stating all these things without giving me a source to look at, because everything I'm seeing is that the date ranges of the bones not only differ from the artifacts, but they differ from each other. The entire site was disturbed which you didn't seem to be aware of. There is no twisting by me here, I've stated my source for the dates of those bones and you have not.

 

two graves, two different dates, age of artifacts does not need to match human remains...but any discrepancies are irrelevant because the rc date for the one child makes it clovis irregardless of the grave was disturbed or the age of other grave items, archeological stratigraphy isn't as important in this case..rc date trumps everything, and the dna of those remains are beringia in origin not european...if an archeologist found the bones in a garage sale it still wouldn't matter rc date would confirm its age, the dna its origin, and newer technology can even tell us where the person lived geographically...

 

You're not stating a source and you're not dating it correctly.