The building was blown up therefore the possibility of survivors is zip, zero, nada .... not happening.
were you personally in Manhattan that day? then how is it that you know with such certainty that the "survivors" were indeed survivors? It could have been faked, and the bit about a lot of people having to be in on it, is an argument from incredulity.
Is the photograph in the article that you pointed to, alleged to be of the survivors just exiting the space? if so, why are they not covered in the same fine dust that covered a large area in Manhattan that day? Was this stairwell, magically isolated from the dust?
Your apparent generalization of all things that stand in opposition as 'conspiracy theories' isn't proof either, is it? (more of a sweeping ridicule, at best). - - - Updated - - - By prefacing everything with what's 'reliable' is a nice way out, don't you think?
This has progressed to a stalemate, one faction believes the Kean report to be accurate, and another KNOWS that it is propaganda. whatever .....
The sort of thing I've had to deal with: Me> WTC7 descended for 2.25 sec at free fall Opposition> It really wasn't free fall and event if it was, it doesn't matter. Right & the Pope is Jewish ....... or?
Just illustrating the fact that people will not agree upon the most basic evidence that the events of 9/11/2001 were not as told by the MSM.
And in the proof dept. I know that it is a significant fact about the events that is three buildings WTC 1, 2 & 7 were completely destroyed other buildings in the same complex were damaged but not destroyed. The 2.25 sec free fall drop of WTC7 is significant and people keep trying to make it go away but its there and its a very significant bit of evidence. what are you looking for? possibly proof that it really was the work of Islamic radicals?
Fact number one you claim is irrelevant because it does not prove anything one way or the other. Fact number to you claim is false WTC 7 did not drop at free fall speed that is absolute fact. It is proven it dropped at less than free fall speed which is not making it go away but merely proves conspiracy theorists lie alot. Any evidence of controlled demo would be fine none exists and no one addresses the simple facts which prove the theory is garbage.
WOW ...... This is what I mean about the lack of agreement on facts. Fact is WTC7 dropped for 2.25 sec at 9.8 m/s^2 now unless you have some special data that refutes the claim, it stands because its part of the NIST report and AE911TRUTH so we have some agreement on facts here. The fact of free fall acceleration is significant because it very clearly indicates that there was no resistance under the falling mass at the time. Also you claim to know what is relevant and what is not, but that is debatable.
No that is not part of the NIST report. The NIST report clearly showed it's speed to be slower than free fallbut you obviously never read it. Been done for a hundred threads and you might as well live with it. You got nothing.
