Domolition of WTC7 confirmed (again)

Discussion in '9/11' started by Stndown, Jun 9, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'd like to introduce this very recent summary of finding regarding WTC7 by a group of physicists, chemists, engineers, commercial pilots, and lawyers who concluded WTC7 was indeed demolished intentionally. Some of the 'funny business' going on between NIST and their claims of not recovering any steel from WTC7 (despite photographs of a NIST investigator pointing out what they say they didn't recover). The link here:

    http://www.911truth.org/press-relea...e-witness-testimonies-architectural-drawings/


    Then, an excerpt from the article:
    The first Panel study deals with the NIST computer simulations, which purported to show that fire-induced thermal expansion caused a girder to be pushed off its seat at Column 79, thereby initiating a global collapse of the entire 47-storey building at 5:21 in the afternoon.

    However, a recent FOIA request has produced WTC 7 architectural drawings showing that the NIST simulations omitted basic structural supports that would have made this girder failure impossible.




    Does anyone think it's a bit strange that NIST chose to completely omit parts of the building's structure in their supposed 'simulations'? I certainly. do.

    Further, the point raised here multiple times concerning comments ranging from 'everybody knew' WTC7 was going to fall, to 'nobody knew' seem to be confirmed here as well. It appears indeed that 'everybody knew', and, in my opinion, and the opinions of many other professionals (far more qualified than me) seem to think so as well, that this indicates foreknowledge of the building's upcoming controlled demolition.



    How does anybody still believe that (at the very least) WTC7 WASN'T some sort of controlled demolition, when there were obvious signs that it was, and obvious funny business going on with NIST? How anyone can keep defending the Kean commission's version and endorse it as some kind of redemption FOR the legitimacy of this whole sham is beyond me. Thoughts please.
     
  2. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh hell,not this again...
     
  3. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    commercial pilots, lawyers, and a nuclear physicist????

    wtf do they know about building demolitions????????????

    :roflol:
     
  4. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
  5. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    commercial pilots, lawyers, and cold-fusion physicists don't know (*)(*)(*)(*) about building demolitions.

    what's next, Foot Surgeons for 9-11 Truth???

    :roflol:
     
  6. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How about SENTIENT BEINGS
    for 9/11 TRUTH

    What do you think?
     
  7. torch1980

    torch1980 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Its like they are trying to convince themselves
     
  8. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just trying to expose the fact that the attack of 9/11/2001
    was not as advertised by the mainstream media.
    It was an excuse to go to war in the middle east,
    and other things that directly benefit the military industrial complex.
     
  9. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As if they ever needed an excuse...
     
  10. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    and with that you provide your own excuse for not recognizing
    criminal corruption within the very institutions that are supposed
    to be working for US, that is the voters & taxpayers, but instead
    work exclusively for the very factions that would seek to oppress US.
     
  11. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bob posts,but in my mi8nd I hear the adults fromthr charlie brown specials..'Wha-wha-whaaaaa..'
     
  12. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    "Domolition of WTC7 confirmed (again) "

    Domolition?
     
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Domolition arigato,Mr Roboto?
     
  14. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Domo!
    Domo!


    :grin:
     
  15. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
  16. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Tried to delete the thread due to the misspelling. I figured the mods would take care of it. I guess they didn't.

    More ridicule, is the only response though, huh? How very predictable. It appears that there's much more going on here than an honest exchange of information. No comments on the actual pertinent points though, I presume?
     
  17. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh hell, those pesky facts, again.
     
  18. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No facts were presented, just speculation.

    Keep spinning, Boss.
     
  19. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Secret!
    Secret!
    I've got a Secret!
     
  20. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Where is the analysis and calculations that show this is the case? Do you even have any?
     
  21. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Some people spend too much time complaining about "trolling", but can't be bothered to answer the questions they were asked.

    I too would like to see Stndown's analysis and calculations.
     
  22. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So much weight is placed on the "calculations" when in fact
    the NIST when describing the fall of WTC7 mentions the
    2.25 sec of free fall acceleration, however provides so little
    data as to how it happened and the infamous column 79 data
    isn't even reliable, the description of how column 79 was
    connected to the structure was falsified in the NIST report.

    you can have your voluminous pages of numbers,
    I'll take common sense any time.
     
  23. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    One does not need any special education
    to see the FRAUD that is involved in the
    official explanation of the events of 9/11/2001
     
  24. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In fact, the less education one has, the more likely they are to believe there was fraud.
     
  25. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Please do look up Patriots Question 9/11
    notice the PHDs & Military Officers .......
     

Share This Page