something from nothing

Ooooh. that denial is so sexy. You continue to deny that you are made of antimatter.

 

You continue to spew out meaningless words. Show PROOF of your claim that antimatter exists.

 

Bubble Gum

 

Nope no post should've been deleted. And I didn't state a suspicion.

 

What is proof in the unreal sense of reality? There is none. There is only the symmetry of the unreality.

In my house every time a person demands proof and logic gets to put a dollar in the dollar jar.

 

And you can show PROOF of that claim?

 

Then what was your comment "I suppose now we'll see a whole bunch of posts getting deleted." based upon, if not suspicion? "suppose" is indicating a guess,, a looking into what might be in the future.

 

Then show PROOF of the "symmetry of the unreality". BTW: If you had not noticed, this forum is not only in your house, but within the homes of many people across the globe. So what happens in your house is truly irrelevant.

 

You ARE the proof my anti matter friend.

And if I'm irrelevant then so are you.

 

Your redundant assertion is truly becoming BORING. Don't you have any evidence or argument in favor of that assertion? The mere assertion is baseless. Also, your reading comprehension is in question: I said nothing about YOU being irrelevant... I said what happens in your house is irrelevant.

 

Do you have any ecidence to support that I need evidence to prove that you're not made of antimatter with a matter soul?

Maybe you should stop demanding proof and try to discuss my salient points of the unrealness of reality being zealous surreal.

 

That evidence would be the presumed rules of debate (the onus of proof is on the claimant) (even though I have often requested that those rules of debate be made manifest, no-one has presented them but still use them). So, as long as those alleged rules are still being presumed to exist and still being presumed to apply to everyone, then you are no exception to that rule. Now you have made a positive assertion/claim that antimatter does exist, therefore, the onus of proof is upon you. Show the PROOF or retract the claim or modify the claim... but you must support your claims.

The salient points of your so-called antimatter being in existence is what is being discussed. If you cannot prove the existence of such a thing after having declared that it does exist is a matter that needs to be proven.

 

This is not a debate. This is an informal discussion. There is a difference you know.

This is not your board so you don't get to call the shots around here.

 

No kidding? Are you serious? Are you for real? Are you non-delusional?

 

Closed ~ Surpassed Post Capacity (750)