No-planers: I challenge you to explain how all the videos and photos....

jet fuel mixed with air does not explode.

 

So, jet fuel exposed to air and a flame/spark will not explode in a crash scenario??....is that your claim?

 

I wonder what the heck koko thinks happens to jet fuel and air inside of a JET ENGINE???

 

it burns like a blow torch

what does the vivid imaginations of debunkers think it does? explodes?

 

There is a proper fuel/air mix that does yield an explosive,
HOWEVER, please note that it needs to be a precise mix.
What we are looking at in the case of the crash of either
"FLT11" or "FLT175" is chaotic events that may ( or may not )
produce pockets of fuel/air mix conducive to exploding and
this is the crux of the matter, what probability would you estimate
that the event of having a large quantity of optimum fuel/air mix
for this to happen in the act of an airliner crashing?

 

explosives generally have their oxygen supply

fuels just conflagrate fast in the atmosphere

 

It is so similar that it will burn the same as diesel.

 

one case I can think of
the hydrocarbon dust in the air at an old type flour mill,
the explosions have been known to blow the roof off the building.
so the fact of air/fuel mix being explosive is a sort of a moot point
however to address my previous comment on the subject, the
odds of getting optimum fuel/air mix in an aircraft crash so as
to produce an explosive effect of any size being quite slim odds.
The events of 9/11/2001 are dependent on a LOT of things
happening that are in and of themselves, low probability items
and taken together, the odds of things stacking up as was alleged
to have done on 9/11/2001 being astronomical!

 

similar cant be the same, looks like more debunker logic

 

So, you think its odd that flight 175 would have exploded in the crash??? Is that your claim? How is odd when explosions when jets crash are the rule, not the exception.

 

LOL, again you and bob show how little you know of the real world. Thanks for the laugh.

 

Nice robust Hollywood movie type fireballs, for 3 out of 4 airliner crashes.
B movie special effects? .... or?

 

I am sure the "left = right" debunker world is very real to you. sorry if I dont join your fantasy.

 

Media deception was a hige part of it. And surprisingly large numbers of establishment media "professionals" know it. http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger2/2357/1113357475496390/1600/z/15223/gse_multipart21811.jpg http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger2/2357/1113357475496390/1600/z/32095/gse_multipart43096.jpg

 

Yes, those are photos of the plane hitting the towers.

I'm not sure what your point is.

 

Did you actually look at the pictures?

Do you expect for an airliner that has just
crashed into a wall, to appear as does the
"airliner" in the picture(s)?

 

Argument from incredulity.

 

So you expect an aircraft that has just struck a wall,
and penetrated said wall, to ONLY be damaged in the
part of the aircraft that has already entered the building
the remaining bit of the aircraft outside the building shows
NO deformation or damage at all. and you are buying the
official story? what?

 

Argument from incredulity.

Show your math as to why it couldn't happen or continue being incredulous and wrong.

Either way.

 

Yes.

Next question?

 

wheres yours?

heres a model LOL



see the numbers on the sides, thats math.

 

really?



do you expect captain kirk to look like he does too? LOL

 

You're saying a Stargate had something to do with the 9/11 attacks?

 

thats the silliest conclusion I have heard to date!

thanks for the laugh.

 

Actually, those are numbers, not math.