WHO warns HIV 'exploding' among gay men.>>MOD WARNING<<

There's nothing wrong with my memory. You simply fail to read carefully.

The body's reaction is the key point not what the person did to their body to cause the sexual arousal. People are aroused by an unending supply of ideas or visual stimulation.

Please learn to read more carefully.

 

No its not. The laws may be on the books, but they cannot be enforced.

 

Another fabrication but expected. Name one state where someone will be jailed for performing a private marriage ceremony and name the law joker that bans it. Back up your BS claim.

Please learn the difference between a private ceremony which anyone can have and the state being forced to recognize that marriage before responding again.

 

Nothing unusual about mentally ill people engaging in self destructive behaviour.

 

Why is it "troubling"? Is it your concern for gay men?

Why is it "no surprise"? HIV steadily decreased for decades. Did "male gay sex" only recently become the "easiest way to contract sexual diseases"? If not, how did HIV rates drop for so long? Did "male gay sex" change?

 

please feel free to discuss the topic which has a recent report.

 

Please stop trolling me.

 

you went on an off topic rant. The topic and report discuss a rise in HIV among those engaging in homosexual sex

 

They coined a new term to describe monogamy among a married gay couple. "Monogamish", which essentially means NOT monogamous.

 

Of course. No one deserves to be infected by HIV.

If you read carefully you would have that answer.

Today, this group is 19 times more likely than the general population to be infected by HIV , Hirnschall said.

As for the reason for the recent increase:


While images of skeletal men dying of AIDS in the 1980s pushed the world to act, a younger generation that has grown up among new treatments that make it possible to live with HIV are less focused on the disease


All of that was quoted in the OP. Next time please read more carefully.

 

Is "natural procreation" heterosexual or homosexual?

 

MOD EDIT>>>OFF TOPIC<<<

Natural procreation is heterosexual. 5th grade sex ed class teaches that. Now what.

MOD EDIT>>>OFF TOPIC<<<

 

"The body's reaction to that sexual stimulation is to prepare the body for natural procreation but the action of stimulation is personal."---texmaster

So, during masturbatory sexual stimulation, the body prepares itself for a HETEROSEXUAL experience....according to what you say?

So in answer to my question, you believe masturbation is heterosexual...even though it involves the body being stimulated by a person of the SAME gender as the person being stimulated...i.e. themselves?

Your little "scientific" talking point makes you say that, as I said. You HAVE to claim that masturbation is "heterosexual"...yet quite clearly, the only gender involved is the SAME gender...i.e. homosexual. A man masturbating himself is a man having sex with a man...himself. There's no woman nor vagina involved.

And what about "autofellatio", tex....the old Ron Jeremy trick of a man, who is flexible enough, fellating his own penis....is that heterosexual or homosexual in nature?

Where does your "science" come down on that...so to speak?

 

OF COURSE. For God's sake Gorn how many times must the same thing be repeated for you?

NO Gorn. Jesus Christ now please PLEASE pay attention. The ACTION of self masturbation is not homo or heterosexual. The BODY'S REACTION to that sexual stimulus IS heterosexual.

If your male partner (which would be homosexual) gets you off Gorn your body doesn't care. Its reaction is the same. It prepares for heterosexual sex.

Please read it. Read it again. And read it again because its the last time I'm going to repeat myself to you.

 

So the "action" of masturbation isn't heterosexual or homosexual...but the "body's reaction" is heterosexual.

Okay......so autofellatio is not homosexual nor heterosexual and the bodily reaction of a man fellating his own penis is heterosexual?

Yes?

 

Marriage doesn't equate to monogamy. ashleymadison.com

 

I'm honestly at a loss at threads like this. The fact that people fight so hard to find ways to say that being gay is bad, whether for religious, or health, or whatever other reasons one can come up with, makes me sad for the world my daughter, who I will love and support whether she is straight or gay, will grow up in. It is my hope that her generation will finally relegate this dying ideal to the garbage heap of history where it belongs.

Rather then demonizing a subsection of the population (left handed people (4% of the population) make up 40% of schizophrenics, yet I see no calls for committing this disproportionate affected group who could harm others), perhaps focusing on the real problems of society might actually bring about some real change.

 

In my opinion, HIV is a pretty good educator. Maybe the best there is.

 

Are you watching old SNL reruns? What part of self gratification are you not understanding Gorn?

Have you finally gotten the point that the body's reaction not the action of sexual gratification is the genetic certainty of heterosexuality and the laughable lack of zero human bodies preparing for homosexual sex? Has that finally gotten through and that's why you didn't respond to it?

 

Its the reverse Cubed. The homosexual advocates are so obsessed with defending homosexuality in whatever form it comes in they simply cannot condemn homosexual pedophilia without reservation. I've said it many times, no conservatives are running around defending heterosexual pedophiles by focusing on their fake lives has heterosexual adults when the pedophilia is discovered. They are forever considered heterosexual pedophiles. Not true for your side as this thread has obviously proved.

 

Ok folks, now that we have established sexual stimulation and all that, lets get back on topic, being
WHO warns HIV 'exploding' among gay men, urges preventive drugs

Thanks
Shangrila
PF Moderator

 

You might be surprised to learn how often a gay marriage is an "open marriage." It's not about monogamy for many of them, it's about tweaking people's noses, fighting "heteronormativity" and the power trip they get from fooling gullible straight people.

http://www.sfgate.com/lgbt/article/Many-gay-couples-negotiate-open-relationships-3241624.php

 

The threads on this site when it comes to Anti-Gay to Pro-Gay number about 100:1. So I don't think it's the pro gay people obsessed with anything other defending themselves and those they support.

As for pedophilia, nobody is defending pedophilia. At all. They are fighting the notion that somehow equates pedophilia with homosexuality (two very different things).

Neither side is ever going to change their mind on this, so watching these threads pop up, and devolve into the same crap over and over and over again, is disheartening.

 

perhaps you didn't read all of the posts? Most are compassionate. Do you really think anyone wants to see a homosexual slowly die due to AIDS?

Heck, fiscal conservatives would want homosexuals to wear condoms just to not bear the expense paid out by insurance (or taxpayers) to treat and provide end of life treatment.

Pro-lifers would want them to wear condoms because all life is precious

I believe that you may be confusing the hate-filled posts by those on the left who don't want to believe that Christians and conservatives want to help homosexuals

 

Then you haven't read this thread.

Not true. When you cannot admit someone is a gay pedophile without reservation and fabricate a conspiracy that calling them that is an attack on homosexuals you are defending gay pedophilia.

- - - Updated - - -

Exactly right and well said.