67,000 people believe something's wrong with what we were told about 9/11

question: Can 50,000 Frechmen be wrong?
or?

 

Yep....My bad...

 

Question: What's a 'Frechmen'.

And yes, of course they can.

 

so then, some X number of AMERICAN citizens
who bought it, hook - line & sinker, that is the fraud
that is the official story of 9/11/2001, can also be wrong.

 

Yet the evidence supports the accepted narrative.

 

The accepted narrative has holes in it so large
that you could lose a death-star therein.

 

The Death Star is a work of fiction. Let's stick to reality: show these 'holes' and provide evidence for your claims.

 

---- The demolition of WTC7 ( & for that matter the towers )

---- the absence of physical evidence that proves any airliner crashed at any of the 4 sites of allegedly crashed airliners.

 

Sources for these fallacious claims?

 

Just to address the aircraft wreckage bit, how long have I been asking for documentation of the physical evidence of the alleged airliners at the various crash sites? Where is it? The faction that supports the hijacked airliners story can not produce physical evidence of there ever having been an airliner at any of the crash sites? what?

 

You've been linked to the reports and photographs from the scene.

Funny, you seem completely unable to read them, and when asked for your own evidence you change the subject.

- - - Updated - - -

Bump for Bob.

Quit running away from the question.

 

Your interpretation ( based on the FRAUD from authority figures )
is that she died in the crash of "FLT77". I refuse to speculate on the subject.
That is did she indeed die, and if so how? Insufficient evidence.

 

Yes, she died. Her body parts were found among the wreckage inside the Pentagon.

 

You can choose to believe as you wish, I refuse to speculate about these matters.
so to you, the death of your ( friend / acquaintance ) is total proof that there was "FLT77" crashed into the PENTAGON and that is the last word on the subject ...... eot .....
OK, that is YOUR business to accept the emotional appeal to buy the story that includes the radical Arab hijackers ( etc...... ) but I do not see it that way because I refuse to be dragged off into the emotional side of the arguments. What we need to focus on is the actual evidence
( and that is rather slim at this point because of either an effort to cover up the crime, or total incompetence by public officials ) .... anyhow ... it is what it is.

Have a nice day

: )

 

That's rich...really, it is. You're entire argument is based on emotion and not facts. You out of hand dismiss facts and evidence because you just can't believe something like this could happen the way it did.

How about being a bit more honest with the basis of your claims?

 

That proved something?

To compute the potential energy of my model the weight of each of my washers must be known. The top washer is about 1.4 oz and the bottom one about 2.1. I would do a linear interpolation since I don't have a scale that precise. The total weight of all of the paper loops is about 1/5th the weight of a single washer of which there are 22 so I ignore it.

But since the WTC had to support far more weight and withstand the wind the Potential Energy of it is far more critical.

psik

 

Do you understand that the engineer who knew that the space shuttle was in trouble before it launched needed only a glass of ice water and a rubber band to prove the point. Likewise a properly constructed model of anything illustrates the fundamental principles without having to reproduce a massive structure to prove the point. This isn't rocket science, its basic stuff that a freshman in high school can get.

BTW: has anyone watched "King of the Nerds" when they had the tower of glass shelves arranged in a tower, and dropping a heavy weight on top of the tower broke several of the panes of glass, but did not keep going to the bottom, it only broke 5 or 6 out of a dozen or so panes of glass in the tower.
This would appear to provide serious evidence for the argument against the act of the top 15% of the tower "collapsing" down on the remaining 85% and causing "total collapse".

 

The evidence supports a cover up.

 

Your video and the model used within are garbage and nothing can be used from it to compare to what happened to the towers.

Like I said before, you probably think that you can take two Hot Wheels cars, bang them together, and then use the results to correctly show what would happen in a REAL auto collision.

What is the conclusion of your video? Are you trying to show those that watch it that the upper section descent should have been stopped?

 

BINGO!!!

And you think psikeyhackr's model was "properly construction" and properly represented the towers??

Another "properly constructed" model of the towers in your eyes?

 

Source for this claim?

 

YouTube, of course!

 

So, I must respond to the brilliance of the Hot Wheels comparison without being insulting.

What velocity must Hot Wheels cars attain to actually damage each other. Without damage it would be an elastic collision as in Newton's Cradle which would absorb no Kinetic Energy.

That is what the paper loops do in my model. Absorb Kinetic Energy which of course slows the falling mass resulting in arrest. Crumple zones in REAL automobiles do the exact same thing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crumple_zone

Maybe your vast intellect can come up with a more interesting comparisons in the future.

psik

 

yeh youtube is awesome you can even learn university physics on youtube, you might want to check it out sometime. LMAO

 

The point is that your video and model used within are complete garbage because they do not properly represent the towers. Therefore, any information taken from your videos is completely irrelevant and prove nothing whatsoever.

Just like my Hot Wheels example. Although that went srtaight over your head,