"Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton 'will be the next president'"

Glenn and Pat predicts Romney landslide
Monday, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:02 PM CST
http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/11/05...slide-stu-thinks-obama-may-get-a-second-term/

 

I do not know a single Democrat that wont vote for her, Benghazi is a non issue except for those that would not of voted for her regardless, the gop beat that horse to death

 

2 things:

#1. Beck isn't pushing Hillary for President.

He is saying the general public is that stupid.

#2. Why is it some people here who are ultimately agreeing with what Beck said (as a whole or in part) FIRST have to mention that in their opinion he is a moron or whatever colorful adjective they care to describe him as?

That has zero relevancy to the OP.

 

Perhaps Hilly has some baggage .. who doesn't. The real question is are people willing to accept the GOP nominees biggest piece of baggage ?

"Open up the case" " A vote for me is a vote for the Tea Party"

Good luck getting the majority to accept that baggage.

 

And even more Republicans Are Supporting Hillary Clinton for President!

Poll: A quarter of Republicans say they may vote for Clinton in 2016
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.co...cans-say-they-would-vote-for-clinton-in-2016/

 

And here's how things currently stand with the Democrats vs. the Republicans and who each side has to offer. The rest of the candidates on the GOP side did not even get close.

Poll: Hillary Clinton ahead, Rand Paul leads GOP
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/...ts-rand-paul-leads-gop-quinnipiac-108645.html

 

While along the way to her election we should call out - loudly - all the former Presidents and First Ladies who have been so supportive of Preezy these last six years. Just as a reminder of what Beck is predicting.

 

And why, other than personal gain, is Clinton making this trip? Maybe a hook up with Christie?

Billionaire Carlos Slim’s contribution to the Clinton Foundation is paying off

 

Not to mention that unsavory list of 47 odd dead people that seem to be in the Clinton closet.
http://theblacksphere.net/2013/10/47-bodies-left-in-the-wake-of-hillary-clinton-part-i/

 

Beck is not a Republican he is a Libertarian. The Clinton years were not prosperous but a cheap parlor trick created through the theft of social security funds. There was not surplus. I do give him credit though at least he wrote an IOU in the form of treasury bonds which is more than I can say for O Bombya's midnight raid to fund the insurance companies in his Medicaid scam.

 

Glenn forgot one very important number in his calculation. She is a fricking loser just like Obama and her incomptence and false belief that Islam is not our enemy cost the lives of four of her betters.

- - - Updated - - -

Well, she is brain dead because she is a progressive leftist. But among Obama voters that is a desirable trait.

 

Boiled down to the bone, we need a real American and a real man in the white house. I think we have had enough of euro-trash socialists and African despots for a while.

 

You mean excellence where mediocrity and buffoonery are the base standard. No what a real American would produce.

- - - Updated - - -

Well, she is more of a man than Obama. There is that to consider.

 

Beck's a simpleton and you agree with him. so in this case are both of you simpletons or intelligent men?

 

Regardless of whether or not Obama voters like progressive leftists, if the Republican party cannot find a viable candidate, they may as well not field a candidate. Instead save their monies for the next election cycle and groom a candidate that can be elected because as of now, they have no one except the "flavor of the week" candidates which reminds me of the 2012 elections where they just couldn't make up their minds till the bitter end as to who their candidate was going to be.

 

Every now and then a blind nut finds a squirrel.

Good luck to you my child.

 

Maybe it's been brought up, but maybe we should all smarten up and stop voting for Democrats and Republicans all together. Neither is the solution. Only the problem.

 

Hillary and the Democrats are looking to revive the great and prosperous days under President Bill Clinton - good luck with that.

 

Why shouldn't it work? Bill has the experience and in 2016 Hillary will have the Power!

 

Nobody from the republican party has said they were running yet. So Progressive leftist Obama voters are just pondering over their wishful thinking and puffing themselves up with the false belief that Hilldabeast is worthy to be president. She is not. And if Obama voters were honest with themselves they could see that for themselves. She is as much a loser as Obama so clearly is.

 

Why do people imagine that one glorious leader in the White House can work miracles?

 

It seems you lucked in when you became part of his audience to witness his intelligence first hand then. I hope your luck continues!

 

Your entitled to your viewpoint but likewise so am I and I don't agree with you. I see the republicans as an ancient party unlike what they were over 50 years ago; they are floundering through infighting within and going nowhere in a hurry. Just my viewpoint.

 

The establishment republicans are just as bad as the establishment democrats. The republicans are counting on the utter cluelessness of progressive leftist democrats and their obvious failures to get them the senate with out stating how they are different than the losers they want to replace, and what their plan is to making things better. A flawed and potentially failed strategy.

 

They are all part of the same hypocrisy.