CBS kicks off the Hillary Campaign

I don't see the coincidence in CBS's release of this show at this time. They have been sampling some Lite-Anti-Obama stories over the past few weeks. Taking notice of the rift between Obama and the military on the ISIS(L) plan.

But this show (IMHO) is clearly their first step in endorsing the Clinton 2016 bid.

http://www.cbs.com/shows/madam-secretary/

 

Just a coincidence i am sure

 

What's amusing is that the producer admits that he was inspired to create it after watching Hillary deal with the Benghazi-gate hearing. You know when she screeched, "What difference does it make?" which so humanized her in this fellow's eyes that he had to start telling a fictionalized rendition of the fictionalized story of her life in and out of politics that she normally holds to anyway. Nice!

 

Hillary Clinton will not run in 2016.

She is old, unattractive, and she polls horribly with women and African-Americans.

She and Bill will waltz off into the sunset later this year, and they will quietly divorce, once their marriage of political convenience has run its course.

 

I can only picture Hilary cackling like the insane after Gadaffi died.... Hilary and Cheney would make one hell of a matched pair.

 

Nah. They won't divorce. She already has Huma and doesn't care who Bubba has.

The marriage of convenience will last 'til one of them keels over.

 

Darth Cheney and Queen Hillary? Nice! Now that would be a new age horror show pairing.

 

What to call this... A televisiocracy? A mediocracy?

 

Wow now potentially America's first woman president. You know she voted for the Iraq invasion. Her husband is probably the better president out of the other two Bush and Obama. I think the next president will be far from being Hilary, it will be a red.

 

Well . . . it DOES sort of make it difficult for CBS to claim that it's politically non-biased. But here's the interesting bit, it's a fruitless political effort by CBS to jumpstart Hillary's supposed bid for the 2016 presidential contest since the sexy looking and YOUNG actress does not remotely resemble the currently dumpy looking Hillary Clinton and no amount of wishful thinking in the universe is going to make the average Dem Party voter believe that the actress and the reality of the dumpy broad with the donkey's braying laugh are supposed to be the same person.

Ergo, all the over-the-top goodness and expertise and hyper efficient competence that the actress will routinely display will not transfer over in the imagination of the average voter to the reality that is Hillary Clinton. But as I said . . . it does definitively blow CBS' endlessly repeated assertions that it is not politically partisan as a broadcast network.

 

After the damage done to her reputation by Obama and a corrupt DNC and an in-the-tank-for-Obama mainstream media back in 2008 it was pretty much rehabilitated and she was set once again to become the Party's presidential shoe-in candidate for 2016, and then just as she was ready to exit stage Left Benghazi-gate happened and then she went on to screech those infamous words, "What difference does it make?" That redamaged her reputation and gave the radical Left -- who supported Obama's bid back in 2008 -- some leverage for prying Hillary out of the Queen-pin spot for 2016, because that elitist leftwingers HATE Hillary Clinton with a stone cold passion; and if for no other reason than she makes Obama look bad in comparison, since long ago the nation came to the realizations that SHE was who they should have voted for way back then.

But she is damaged goods nowadays and it's doubtful that she can now overcome her accumulation of negatives, her relatively advanced age, the fact that she does have an abrasive personality, she DID try to destroy those women who reported her husband for sexual predator activities, frankly, she's just not all that nice of a person. So we shall see.

 

How would you like to be in Tea Leoni's shoes? She has the future of America riding on her shoulders. If she flops (and she will), the entire country flops.

lololololololololololol

 

Ha! That's a worry for her, isn't it? One thing though. Since this is a cynical bit of political partisan pandering by CBS we know that they will back her until it's so obvious that the show stinks (or doesn't) that she will never be able to claim afterwards that she wasn't given a fair chance to show what she could do.

 

On the other hand, the two parties could run a sack of salt vs a sack of sugar for president, and still one or the other would win the race.

 

In may she had support of 61% of women..another shows 80-90% of African Americans support her. Not sure where you're getting your info

 

Well **** everybody should know the most logical thing to do is to nominate Biden he is essentially the president in waiting. That Hilary Clinton you got to watch because she has no doubt been rubbing shoulders with the mafia up in New York during her political duties. New York is one of their strongholds, then Chicago, where that ****ing mongrel of a dog Obama is from. Obama was elected president with the help of the mob, the mafia will help Clinton. Oh for ****s sake the American people I hope are sick of this ****ing power family ********. Clinton will be a ****ing awful president the presidency should really go to an independent in a perfect world but it will probably be a republican just another ****ing making of a man I will call it now it will be Portman, Rob Portman of Ohio, a republican, who has already been in government, and is in fact partly responsible for the ****ing huge deficits under president Bush. You watch, it will probably be that ****ing stooge Portman I can see it now.

 

I find it hilarious how they have an attractive blonde playing Hillary. That woman doesn't look anything like Hillary. The faux is strong with this one...

I want to see a Godzillary TV show on the Sarah Palin channel.

 

I was about to ask you the same thing, sir.
Those numbers seem rather inflated.

The poll I recall was either from Politico or Bloomberg, back in July.

 

keep believing that, btw, what old white man will represent your party?

 

Why should race age or gender matter? I thought the left was tolerant?

 

it doesn't, that was my point, the prev poster said Clinton would not run because she was old and unattractive

 

Here's a BBC article from twelve days ago discussing Hillary's Polling Numbers Decline:

So essentially back when Dems were waxing enthusiastic about what a great potential candidate Hillary Clinton was, everyone was actually comparing her to the sad sack president inside the Oval Office that Barack Obama had turned out to be. But now that she's finally once again being considered on her own merits rather than against those of the current Clown-in-Chief -- well -- now Queen Hillary just doesn't seem to be all that great any more in the eyes of the generic voter. Oh my!

It's called political reality, and its something that our leftwingers are allergic to considering what numbers of them KNEW that a first term U.S. senator with zero meaningful national level experience and no history of management or of leadership skills was going to go down in history as a stupendously great president. Sigh! So . . . it . . . goes.

 

Ha! I never even begin to predict the twists and turning of a presidential election until at least one political camp has finished up their primaries and has actually settled on a candidate. Usually I wait until both sides have done so because until then it's anybody's game.

Take 2008 for instance. Everyone Left and Right KNEW that Hillary Clinton was an absolute shoe-in for the Democratic Party since before Obama joined in the bulk of the Mainstream Media was already treating her as if she were the president elect. Then Obama showed up with his MORE liberal looking skin color, far fewer years on the physical clock, an infectious grin, the ability to read from a teleprompter the speech snippets stolen from statesmen of the past in a golden sounding natural orator's tone of voice . . . and then suddenly from that same Mainstream Media it was, "Hillary? Hillary who? Oh you mean Mrs. Clinton . . . the Black hating White-Racist?"

So, anyway, I tend to wait until at least the primaries are over and done with before getting . . . excited.

 

This attempt at portraying the real Hillary as this make-believe Hillary is obviously CBS's attempt at rewriting history to align with what liberals want the viewers to believe is a Hillary documentary. I doubt anyone outside a few Hillary groupies will bother to watch, but I doubt CBS will pay much attention to the ratings.
My sense is Hillary isn't that well liked by the media drones, but they're liberals first, so they'll play along for awhile.

 

One of the comments on the show by one of the three major stations, not sure which one, stated the show was Hillary with a human face. Yikes.