POLL: What should be done to thugs who try to murder American hero Darren Wilson?

American hero, Darren Wilson, will rightly not be indicted for rightly shooting dead, in self-defense, the violent thug Michael Brown.

The thugs will try and murder Darren Wilson, on the basis of their thuggery in recent days.

Darren's life must be defended at all costs.

Israel is with the USA on this.

 

He's not a hero, he was just doing his job...

 

I agree.

If he was a hero, it was accidental. In the right place at the right time, as they say. I'm guessing he wishes he had been somewhere else.

 

Honestly, these rioters should be considered terrorists. They are rallying in support of a violent offender who tried to kill a police officer. These rioters are burning business, robbing liquor stores, fire bombing cars...
They should be treated like any other domestic terrorist. Lock the racists up and throw away the key. Or shoot them on sight, I don't care.

 

He did his job and he did it well. He is a brave, American hero. We, in Israel, admire such decisive action.

- - - Updated - - -

All true.

 

We in America appreciate your kind words for our hero. I too believe he is a hero. I believe anyone defending the people from these violent criminals deserves 1 million dollar salary.

 

It goes much deeper and further than the Wilson/Brown incident. I'm afraid the chickens have come home to roost.

 

Hero is a bit of an exaggeration. He is being highly criticized for using excessive force.
Guilty or innocent, Ferguson brought up some essential questions on the future of American police force.
We need to take another look at how we train and arm officers. It became clear that many police don't respect the tools the taxpayers allot them.

 

If shooting an unarmed person is all it takes to be a 'hero,' then wow the standards have certainly dropped.

 

He is a hero for standing up to a thug and stopping the thug from committing further violence and robbery.

The termination of Michael Brown was both legally and heroically implemented. Michael Brown, a violent thug, is no longer around to commit his thuggery. The law abiding citizens of Ferguson are safer off for it.

This is NOT about black versus white. It is about thuggery versus the law.

 

There are plenty of laws on the books covering attempted murder. And it they succeed in murdering Officer Wilson, there are plenty of laws covering that as well.

Israel has nothing to do with this. It ain't your concern. Go away.

 

Anything which threatens the USA is our concern. We are allies. I am not going away.

Israel will assist the USA in the best strategies to catch and cage the thugs.

 

Exactly...Just like the Bundy Ranch Terrorists.

 

Is he the Wind beneath your wings...Bette?

 

He did it well?

Anyone with a gun could have shot Michael Brown.

 

No reason to stop a murder squad that does not exist. The crap people sit around and invent in their cracked minds.

Wilson is a social pariah. His life will never be the same. He has joined the ranks of other pariah... George Zimmerman, Casey Anthony, and OJ Simpson.

 

You wish.

 

I don't know much about the Bundy thing. I was in military training during the whole incident and never really read up too much about it. My unit was called up for pre deployment training.

Were there deadly fights, burning down buildings, assaulting women, and robbing liquor stores?

I'm not asking sarcastically, as stated, I heard about the Bundy ranch thing...but never cared to look it up since it happened while I was training for down range.

 

Some of them are violent...not all of them. Do you think the one's who are peacefully protesting should be considered terrorists? I would recommend getting a constitution and checking it out. The first amendment you come across will tell you that people have the right to peaceably protest whatever the hell they want to protest.

And why should a cop, ANY cop, not be tried for killing an unarmed person? There was no way in a million years he would have been convicted. There isn't a lawyer on earth who could have convinced 12 people that he was guilty of murder, but he still killed a man, and I think the public has a right to hear the case. I like how you, and everybody else who so adamantly defends Wilson have absolutely no idea what happened that day, seeing as how the grand jury hearing was not public. I'm not saying I knew what happened either, maybe he was using reasonable force (personally, I think he was), but I don't know for sure. What I DO know for sure is that one man was armed, and he shot a man that was unarmed (I don't care about the race of either of them). That is a fact that cannot be refuted. As somebody who strongly supports the second amendment, I think that in MANY cases, even if Wilson wasn't a cop, he would have had the right to shoot Michael Brown. That being said, if Wilson wasn't a police officer, he would have gone to trial for sure. It's very rare that a citizen shoots an unarmed citizen and doesn't go to trial. He should have had his day in court just like any other person who shoots an unarmed person would have.

 

Some of the people who associate with the terrorists in Yemen are 100% non-violent. Obama doesn't mind droning them to death. Guilty by association. The protesters aren't doing anything, aren't turning in names of rioters/terrorists....they are just as guilty.

 

Yemen doesn't live under the American constitution, the protesters in Ferguson do, and they have the right to speak freely and peaceably assemble for whatever they want to. They aren't guilty of anything, and if you believe the government should step in and stop them, you might as well burn the constitution of the United States because it would be nothing more than a worthless piece of paper.

 

That's not my point. If they were considered terrorists, they wouldn't be protected by the constitution. Since you consider yourself a barracks lawyer, tell us how many articles of the UCMJ protect terrorists?

Thank you....