St Louis shooting: protesters clash with police at scene of teenager's death

So what. There was due process. The grand jury found no basis on which to proceed with an indictment. The criminal robbed a store, the criminal assaulted the store clerk, the criminal verbally assaulted a police officer, the crimonal then physically assaulted the police officer, the criminal then tried to sieze the police officers weapon, the criminal then attempted to flee (which he should have continued to do), the criminal then turned on the police officer and put his head down and charged the police officer with intent to do harm, the police officer fired in self defense and the criminal died because he was out of control loser and left the police officer no choice but to defend himself. Those are the issues, the grand jury heard all the evidence, the grand jury based on that evidence so no reason to bring a criminal indictment because the criminal behaved like a criminal and the police officer behaved like a police officer protecting the public. Nothing about forgane about any of this. The evidence was weighed and the criminal is dead just as it should be.

When this first came out I believed the lie that the 'gentle giant' was shot in the back and I thought the police officer should go to jail. Then the truth came out and now I thibk the world is better off without the 'gentle giant' and a good man doing his job no longer has a career.

 

For who?

Because the prosecution didn't try to get an indictment.

True.

Based on the Officer's testimony and nothing else.

Yep those horns on top of Brown's head would have definitely killed him. I guess that taser gun or baton just wouldn't have done the trick.

Really?

No one should have died that die.

Actually we still don't know all the truth in this matter.

 

Thpppppt, the grand jury heard all the evidence. Testimony from witnesses including those who told the truth and the liars, forensics, not one- not two- but three different autopsies all drawing the same conclusions, the recordings of all communications, cell phone video's, and the whole shebang was presented. If their was any evidence that suggested guilt on the part of the police officer or innocence on the part of the 'gentle giant' there would be a trial. But as it is there is a dead criminal and a ruined police officer because of race baiting lies trying to ignite a new race war.

 

Here is more of that foolish bull(*)(*)(*)(*) about a race war. People want to know how in the hell a Police Officer was allowed to kill an unarmed man whom he claimed attacked him and he feared for his life, but we haven't seen not one scratch on this so-called fearful police officer. Again no one had to die that day.

 

Oh please. The above post reflects the utter acceptence of the racist paridigm that is a creation of lies, and ignorence of and ignoring the real facts. Wilson had no choice but to blieve that the 'gentile giant' meant him harm, he hit him several times, and he attempted to get the police officers gun, and then returned for more. IN the same situation you would have shot to kill too. Be fricking real dogg.

 

How is it that you are struck several times by a man that weighs 290lbs and you have no injuries to show for it. In the same situation I don't know that I would have had to shoot and kill him and neither do you. I am be frickin real cat.

 

OK. I guess the poster has never been in a fight or a life and death situation and has no idea what to do. The heat of the moment dictates the level of response. Being attacked blurs the line of prudence and decision making processes. Even a good dog will bite when cornered and attacked.

 

According to the released Grand Jury evidence, he had injuries. Stop LYING to cover for the THUGS.

 

Well, besides the fact that many disagree with the Zimmerman decision (and with the OJ decision, etc.), nobody is saying that grand juries are useless. Instead, the complaint is that grand juries have a terrible track record when it comes to members of the law enforcement team. When a grand jury failure to bring an indictment against an ordinary citizen is an extremely rare event, BUT a grand jury failure to bring indictments against cops is almost universal, we have the suggestion of perhaps some underlying bias.

And when we look in detail, we discover that (1) the grand jury is selected and managed by the prosecutor, who determines what charge is to be brought, what evidence and witnesses will be considered, etc.; and (2) by golly, the prosecutor can't do his job without the cooperation of the police!!! And sure enough, prosecutors almost never return indictments against their teammates. Isn't that amazing? Is this what we really want?

Or maybe you are arguing that policemen never do anything illegal?

 

That comment was made 4 weeks ago. Has it taken this long to think of some sort of response? If that's the case, it wasn't a good use of your time. "Or maybe you are arguing that policemen never do anything illegal?" Good grief that's ridiculous.

 

You mean that little red mark on the right side of his cheek that could have come from shaving.

 

racebaiters backpedalling....


it's a classic scene repeated over and over when facts don't match agenda....

 

Well show me the fact of his injuries, the racist will defend to the end.

 

And you got your Doctor of Medicine degree.....where?