Why Don't Liberals Care About Black-on-Black Killing?

It's not BS claims. It's pattern recognition. Everybody sees that Liberals spend an ridiculous amount of time talking about incidents like ferguson and trayvon martin, so everybody knows you have the time to talk about this stuff. But then we also see so little of that time dedicated to black on black crime. We know you have the time to talk about it but you choose not to. And when nobody gives a good reason, we are left to draw our own conclusions.

Care to explain?

 

And witnesses provided evidence in the grand Jury that Michael Brown, did attack officer Wilson before Wilson shot him. Brownie never raised his hands in surrender to Wilson.

 

If you only knew how silly that statement sounds....

 

True. And ll we ever hear about is the white cop shooting a black kid.

- - - Updated - - -

Cops' lives matter. You do what the cops tell you to do and you will not get shot. You decide you're gonna "step ta" da man? Good luck home boy.

 

Right. And then we got three months of national media attention, rioting and looting, and even the president himself weighing in... But not when a Vice Lord pops a cap inna Black Gangster Disciple on Chicago's South Side?

 

Really? Find me a white cop shooting a black kid that DIDN'T result in rioting. Hell, they burned down half of LA when white cops beat Rodney King because he could not be subdued because he was high on PCP.

 

Well here's a short video on the subject:

[video=youtube;Dhby06LaBeQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dhby06LaBeQ[/video]

 

What a stupid, intentionally misleading statistic that has no relevance to the topic. Proportionally, a lot more young black men are killed than are young white men. In other words, if 100 white guys are murdered, 85 of the assailants will be white. But proportionally, 500 black guys will be murdered in the same time period equaling 425 black assailants. You are FIVE TIMES more likely to be a murder victim if you are black. Furthermore, whites don't go out and burn businesses to the ground when "one of our own" is killed by a police officer of a different race, nor do white presidents go on TV and say if they have a son he would have looked like Chandler. THAT is the point of this thread. Black lives only matter when they fit the narrative of the mainstream "civil rights activists" and their lapdogs in the mainstream media.

 

Because it makes the news org money.

 

It wasn't about the statistics but to show that some black people are very aware of the problem of black on black crime.

 

Sure, whatever. Now back to the part where you are comparing what a cop does to some gang banger in the inner city? Still waiting to see why you think they should be held to the same pitifully low standard.

 

Doesn't mean a damn thing.

 

So you point is that we should hold police to the same level of responsiblity as gang bangers.

 

Why don't liberals care? Because to them black lives don't matter...black votes do.

How else are they supposed to create a fictional boogeyman and scare blacks into voting for them unless they only focus on the small cases of white on black crime? Black on black crime does not fit the false narrative liberals use to scare blacks into voting for them so they do not care about it.

It is that simple.

- - - Updated - - -

You mean completely ignore it like libs do?

 

I already proved that the very people mentioned are working on the issue. So either you missed that by accident or on purpose. Either way if you continue to repeat that liberals don't care about black lives you will sound misinformed.

 

You bring up a very interesting point. It's the media that whips these isolated events into a frenzy that leads to racial division, unrest, and in the case of Brown - violence and rioting.

The problem is - the Trayvon and Brown incidents - both - were the wrong incidents from which to choose, because in both of those cases, the evidence showed the young men to have been instrumental in their own deaths.

If blacks truly feel as though white officers unfairly target them - they need to choose better incidents to showcase their opinion.

And, yes, it does seem hypocritical that the media focuses on these isolated incidents and totally dismisses the much, much-higher risk to blacks from black-on-black crime.

What's killing young black men in horrific numbers?

Not whites.

 

"...working on the issue." ?

That's not good enough. Where are the protests? Where is the rioting and looting? Where is the outrage to society when the greatest riskk to young black men - is other young black men?

While perhaps not all liberals are heartless and do not care about the high death tolls, many do, and that's why we don't see the protests and outrage we see over isolated incidents like the Brown event.

As a political tool, liberals USE minorities to garner votes but they don't give two hoots about those minorities after they vote.

It's good business for democrats when they can whip up a frenzy over a white-on-black killing, whether or not the killing was justified under our laws. But, when blacks die at the hands of other blacks, they sweep it under the rug, because pointing it out - or showing any concern whatsoever for those young lives - might discourage blacks from voting.

This is a typical liberal reaction. Democrats have become the "me, me, me" party.

 

Here's the difference. When a black kills a white, you don't see whitey running around rioting and protesting. Sadly, people will murder. If a white kills a black, or a white cop kills a black, we get Jesse, Al, Holder and Obama. Riots, looting and arson. Liberals lose their minds and want summits, hearings, teachable moments an all kinds of crap to placate the mob. So where's the outrage from the left when black kills black?

- - - Updated - - -

Your link has nothing to do with the topic............Why Don't Liberals Care About Black-on-Black Killing?

- - - Updated - - -

Show me all the hand wringing and gnashing of teeth over black on black crime like libs do when it is white on black.

- - - Updated - - -

Martial law.........

- - - Updated - - -

What facts did you show that refutes the OP's point?

 

Cut the crap.I live in Chicago. Al shows up to play race pimpas if our Jesse wasn't enough. Michelle showed up for the funeral of a black girl that became a high profile story. Put that under 'photo-op'. Where were the Obama's after the shootings last July Fourth weekend when 82 were shot and 14 killed? Obama came up here last November to talk about immigration and Ferguson! Not Chicago killing but Ferguson! Gee, I wonder why. When you get your 'intellectual bread' from Stewart without doing your research, that's lame and pathetic.

- - - Updated - - -

Atta lefty! Divert as usual. You don't like the topic?

- - - Updated - - -

Chicago had the toughest gun laws in the nation at one time. Didn't matter to the thugs.

- - - Updated - - -

 

You haven't proven anything. Libs do not care about black lives they only care about votes.

 

Who are these mysterious "Liberals!" about whom ideological media entertainers rave, rightist propaganda outlets inveigh, and fixated wacko birds are in a perpetual snit?

​

.

"Who are those guys?"​

.

"Don't let them scare you. This is just make-believe."​

 

The one's who never speak to the issue of black on black crime, divert when confronted with it or make jokes about it. You know anyone like that?

 

How have YOU addressed crime in black ghettos?

 

If a person whispered in your ear, you might have trouble hearing it, but something was said, at least compared to a scream. The media decides what to report and publicize, not the individuals. Black lives have always mattered, and have always been known to anyone listening. Instead of listening to the whispers, people just decided to pay attention when they finally heard the screams.

 

Trayvon Martin.