Why Don't Liberals Care About Black-on-Black Killing?

nor the 12 year old shot in Cleveland after having only 1.5 seconds to comply

 

Why do you think I have a responsibility to address an issue created by liberals?

 

Put that under responding and showing support for a community. People need to know that they're being heard, showing up does that.

Probably in the White House.

Because how the larger movement goes, the smaller movements shall follow?

Kinda ignoring the Chicago Tribune aren't you?

 

True. Very true indeed.

- - - Updated - - -

Because you're debating, and debaters need to have a better solution if they're to say the current solution is a problem.

 

What makes you think they don't care about it? Why would anyone not care about it? I mean, are all liberals emotionless psychos in your opinion? Please explain why you think liberals don't care.

 

That doesn't apply in this case because liberals are STILL escalating the problems. They have not stopped. As noted, this is something happening as a result of actions of the liberal democrats so they must first stop before any true healing can start.

Because they are unlikely to stop anytime soon - no one can go in and reverse the damage.

It's a sequence and neither I, nor any other person, is responsible for trying to pick up the pieces when the perpetrators are still tearing down the house.

What are YOU going to do to stop the liberal democrats from wreaking more havoc on the black community? When we have that solution, then, and only then, can we move on to the helping stage.

So - I await your solution.

 

What on earth are you talking about? What are liberals doing to increase gang violence?

 

Anytime liberals say that stupid crap 'blacks are in gangs and commit crime because of poverty', they give bangers excuses. Whenever they lose their lunch over every type of crime EXCEPT black on black crime, they are looking the other way. Whenever liberals blurt out the stupid moral equivalency crap ,'what about white on white crime', they are IGNORING black on black crime and really don't want to talk about it. I wonder why.

 

Did you think my response earlier was created in a vacuum? It wasn't. I already posted the information you just asked for. I always end up wishing folks would read the threads they respond to. It's not just you - it happens all the time.

 

I guess evidently if you don't create threads about the black gang problem or one has to compare a cop to local street thugs in order to show concern.

 

Exactly? Why would they do that? Why would anyone want to ignore violence like that? You aren't making much sense right now. Al Sharpton (who I don't care for but is undeniably liberal) and co. held a gun violence summit in Chicago and spoke out for peace on the streets of Chicago. I've never seen a conservative in Chicago doing that. Perhaps you could show me.

 

Right. Why should we hold police officers to a higher standard than gang members? lol

 

They didn't quite think this one through before poo-pooing the bed.

 

Because it's true. Prove otherwise. And to hell with that BS summit the race pimps held here. Do you know why they held it? Because Jesse was getting pressure forom the black community because of their silence. Don't tell me what I already know because I live in Chicago. Jesse was catching all kinds of hell and for once, he spoke to the issue. ONCE! And pimp Al showed up so he could say 'me too'. So I don;t want to hear it. I've been watching these slimy POS for decades now. Oh and where is homeboy Obama? Spare me.

Conservatives in Chicago?? LOL!!! Ever take a look at the political landscape here?

 

So what you're telling me is that your strategy is to just let it happen? Sounds a bit like letting Rome burn. Besides, isn't the point of citizenry to bring up ideas that will enhance the community? Letting your opinions be heard is what a good citizen does.

Easy. I'm listening. I recongize I am in no position to be debating what the government is doing, only to try to understand it. Once I can understand it, then I can start debating it.

As do I.

 

This is the United States. If you know of a way to force democrats to stop walking on the black community while pandering for votes - I'm all ears.

I know of no law that will allow us to make them stop.

Therein lies the problem.

 

Easy, competition. Monopolies are bad right? So find a way to get into that market. How? Right now listen, figure out why a community thinks the way it does, then use that information. The reason the Dems have a monopoly is because the GOP isn't listening to minorities. "Pandering" to them is the same thing as listening. So listen, take note and do what they want done.

 

"Pandering" and "listening" have nothing in common. The latter seeks to understand, the former seeks to temporarily pacify.

You might find some GOP candidates that want to ride on that bandwagon, but by and large, conservatives oppose buying votes through pacification.

Trying to talk them into doing it, which would only further deteriorate the problems in the black community, would be senseless. And, we can be thankful for that.

 

With 95+%, of Black's voting for your idea's and policies, why would Holder/Obama want to say anything (pro-con) about anything. I'm not sure in 8 years of campaigning, he even gave a speech in Black communities and the real tell all, or held a funs raiser. White on Black crime, however is politically advantageous and protects that loyalty...

 

Yeah but in the end, I'm sitting here laughing at you, and you're all mad and stuff because I pointed out that the only people who have had a real voice regarding the violence we were speaking of were actually liberals. You wouldn't have gotten so angry if it weren't true either. It'll be okay buddy.

 

Well goody for you.

......because ignorance masquerading as truth is aggravating. It'll me okay buddy. You can fix that. Google is you buddy. And if I wasn't telling the truth about you, you wouldn't be deflecting in your responses. I've proven everything I said and shot down all of what you claimed. Learn to accept when you're wrong.

 

You've proven that Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson don't really care about violence in Chicago? I missed that. Could you direct me to this proof?

 

Of course you missed it. Go back and read what I posted earlier.

 

It raises uncomfortable questions about how people aren't all the same. Those with a left-leaning brain hate the idea everyone isn't the same.

 

Except that in the case of Michael Brown. Wilson was upholding the law that Brown had broken.

1. Brown assaulted the store owner after stealing the "cigars".
2. Brown assaulted a police officer, attempted to take his gun, and ran away.
3. Brown turned around and rushed a police officer with intent to do bodily harm.​

Each violation of law was recorded or witnessed by people in the Town of Ferguson.