Gay Marriage Goes Before US Supreme Court

You mean why am I anti cultural marxist and pro family,tradition,marriage? Because its the right thing to do.
I don't need any mental help. I am perfectly OK
My world view is different but its also sane and should be immediately implemented! My kids are awesome. They don't want negro's or Mexicans for our new neighbors LOL...

 

Your kids sound like awful human beings.

 

Are you one of those folks that thinks television should be banned ?

 

Lol no. My kids have TV's in their rooms....I fixed it so they only see their cartoons and a few shows we approve of and they want to watch...

 

Sounds like your kids are young. What about as they get older ? There are all kinds of degenerate programing out there !

 

Leave it to the states and be done with it. Why does the left wing insist on forcing everything on everyone at the federal level?

 

Oldest is 8.5. Our job is to monitor what our kids listen to,watch,wear,who they are friends with etc. That is if you want to them to be wholesome good kids that grow up to be productive members of society. They ask WHY they aren't allowed to listen to,watch,read something we explain it to them. No reason just saying NO and leaving it at that...

 

Lol poor grammar is a negative quality? LMAO....Racism is codewode for anti white....say what you mean now. I parent CORRECTLY its called hands on paying attention to bad influences around my children in music,literature,TV etc. Sucks for you if you think that is Authoritarian I will get back with you when my oldest is a Veterinarian my 2nd child is running his own business demolishing buildings or is a fireman he hasn't decided and when 3rd one has become a Actress and since baby is to young to know what she enjoys I will get back to you on that. My kids at their young ages have GOALS and they aim to reach them and I will push them to do so.Cultural marxism is very real if you opened your eyes and look around...again media,music,literature,tv shows,"role models" kids are supposed to look up to etc. Tradition is something worth obsessing over and protecting. You show me logic I will argue with you on it..so far all I see are shrills of RACIST and BIGOT! LOL

 

I was of that mindset as well. I never said to my son "because I said so" not even once. I always gave a reason and sometime we debated. Every so often he would win. If I could not come up with good justification for my position ... perhaps my position was not justified.

Not so easy to out debate his Father so I won most of the time but not always. The kid turned out very well and never had a break in relationship that you so often see.

 

No, racism is not a code word for anti-white. That's complete horse(*)(*)(*)(*). Racism is a code word for racism.

Your children's financial success doesn't matter. You've turned them into ignorant and ethically deficient people.

Cultural Marxism, however, really is a code word. It's a code word for "Not bigoted".

Tradition is worthless. "Because we did it in the past" is not a valid reason for anything.

 

Yes it is a codeword for anti white.
The fact they are being raised to care about their future is what's important. To YOU who are nothing more than a cultural marxist minion they are ignorant and deficient I say they are brilliant awesome people and I am damn proud of who they are and what they will become.
Cultural Marxism is what I said it is. Look it up.
Tradition is worth keeping....I bet you are a marxist....those that HATE what America was founded on...you really should move to China or Cuba...bet you would enjoy all that freedom and marxism they have there.By hating tradition you hate what America was founded upon. PERIOD.

 

http://whitegenocideproject.com/anti-racist-is-a-codeword-for-anti-white/
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism

 

I'm just going to stop before I get banned. You've renounced the use of reason anyway.


BTW, metapedia isn't a credible source for anything.

 

Your admitting defeat is noted. Oh and it is if you want truth....

 

And men and women, husband and wife, father and mother are not code words for anti homosexual.

 

Nobody claimed that they are. Your point?

 

The courts claim the distinctions intent is to exclude homosexuals.

 

If you are really concerned about the safety of your kids, I'd suggest keeping them away from Catholic priests. Call gays mentally ill, or pedophiles, or whatever else you can come up with, nothing changes the fact that SSM is spreading like wildfire, and gays will be treated as equals, and when you raise your kids to hate them (as you have the right to do), just don't be surprised when your kids are one day treated as social pariahs for having such antiquated views. Unless of course you live in Alabama or some place like that, in which case you and your fellow bigots can drink a couple beers, talk about how good it felt the last time you banged your sister, and complain about the "sexual perverts".

 

Because it is. Context. If you're going around saying "only this group can do this", that's logically the same thing as saying that other groups cannot.

 

But homosexuals aren't excluded. There are probably thousands of people in a heterosexual marriage now who will someday come to identify themselves as homosexuals. And secondly they aren't the only ones excluded because two people who are closely related are also excluded. As well two heterosexuals of the same sex would also be excluded.

And limiting food stamps to poor people isn't an intent to exclude people who are not poor, its an intent to INCLUSE people who are poor. Limiting marriage to heterosexual couples isn't an intent to exclude homosexuals, its an intent to include heterosexual couples, the only couples with a potential of procreation.

 

Homosexuals shouldn't be a protected group, being gay is a sexual preference, nothing more.

 

Then hetrosexuality is merely a sexual preference, and hetrosexuals should not be a protected class when it comes to the privileges of marriage.

Simple, isn't it.

 

You and I both know that the whole "equal right to straight marriage" thing is disingenuous. You don't actually believe that. Nobody does. Gay people are denied the right to marry someone they actually love and desire. Having a sham marriage to stay in the closet is a punishment, not a right.

Procreation doesn't (*)(*)(*)(*)ing matter in this conversation. I know you're going to pull out some collectivist rationalization about how we need to trample individual liberties so we can squeeze out even more hungry mouths on a planet that can't support them, but save it. I don't think you believe a single argument you use against gay marriage. I think you just try to hastily throw together any justification for your bigotry you think might fool people.

When most of the people campaigning against gay rights are doing it on the explicit platform of moral panic and a desire for theocracy; when these laws are authored by people who decry queer people as a plague upon the earth, and you claim they have no intent to exclude queer people, it becomes obvious that you aren't even trying.

- - - Updated - - -

It's a sexual orientation. It encompasses sex as well as romantic preference. One's relationships are an important part of their life and it's ignorant to pretend that it isn't a part of the person.

 

But couples of the opposite sex aren't encouraged to marry because they are both heterosexuals, they may not be. Couples of the opposite sex aren't encouraged to marry because they have sex with each other. They are encouraged to marry because when couples of the opposite sex have sex, children are frequently result. Their sexual orientation is irrelevant. What you are arguing is that we cant give any preference to the only type of couple that perpetuates the human species, because it offends the gays who usually would rather not participate.

 

So run along little boy and see if you can find someone arguing such a thing. Im usually the one who points out that marriage isn't equality and is instead INEQUALITY by design.

Revealing, you haven't yet even begun to grasp my arguments. Marriage is to INHIBIT procreation.

My argument on this topic have remained consistent for years. And they are not my arguments. They are the courts arguments used for decades.

Im an atheist, but of course you and I both know that's why you would rather argue with the religious opponents.