Which is worse, the liberals for weakening America and bowing to every anti-Christian, anti-America minority group, or the conservatives who run their mouths against them but do absolutely nothing about it? I expect liberals to kow to Islamists, atheists, illegal alien felons, border security laws, etc., but it disgusts me that we have a conservative party of 'patriots' who do nothing because they're afraid of being called names by these limp-wristed liberals who can only bribe voters to stay in power or import future democrats from third world countries. How low have we allowed our standards to sink when we put someone in office who doesn't even believe in American exceptionalism, and just because he's 'black'? Now, many who consider themselves 'American' are willing to put a corrupt liar in office just because she's a woman and 'making history' is more important to them than the welfare of the country. They may consider themselves to be American, but I certainly don't. One can be a citizen of this country but that doesn't mean they're a patriot.
So you will make yourself the self appointed arbiter of who gets to call themselves an American? Of all the things that the "get off my lawn," and Tea People do, this is the thing that I find most disgusting - this, "you have to think just like me," attitude. What a bunch of BS.
No, it's not BS; it's quite the truth. We don't seem to be a majority rules nation anymore when gays can force a bakery out of business while leaving Muslim businesses alone, or when a Muslim can get an American fired for mistakenly not serving halal meat to their brat. The catering and pandering to Islamists, atheists, illegals, etc., can be traced directly to liberals.
I think a lot of people have simply given up. Hard to keep morale high when someone can cross a border, drop an anchor baby, and then immediately collect welfare benefits.
Thanks to liberals, they don't even have to wait or fill out the paperwork themselves. As soon as the anchor baby is shot out, there's a social worker right there putting them in the system. At the same time, veterans who served this nation have to wait months to receive service at veterans hospitals.
The laws that were applied to these cases existed long before they were used to defend non-Christians. There have been FAR more lawsuits for refusal of services brought by heterosexual couples than by gay couples. Until very recently, a heterosexual could get a gay person fired from a career in the military for having a picture of their loved one in their wallet. A gay person can legally be evicted from their home for being gay in some states. There are still laws on the books some states that could prevent atheists from running for political office. You take a few cases brought by a few individuals and cry and gnash your teeth over the end of the world, yet Christians and heterosexuals have used those same laws for decades to bring lawsuits against businesses and individuals in this country. Again - it's a bunch of BS.
And if liberals in all their stupidity have their way, Muslims will take over and then we'll see what they'll do to gays.
And if Bigfoot isn't captured soon, we will have to program self-driving cars for Bigfoot evasive maneuvers ... Your turn.
I think you got this backwards actually... we have become a majority rules nation... we used to be a republic... in this new majority rules nation we have, one side is forcing the other side to adopt its ideology and drop its own beliefs or be punished by law... in a republic we used to allow ONE voice to say no... but now we don't have that right, we have to do what the majority says we have to do... think of a jury trial, ONE person can stand up and say no... despite the fact 11 other jurors said the person was guilty, ONE person had the power to say NO... if we applied whats happening in society to that jury, now you would only need 7 of the 12 to say guilty... and ONE voice would no longer matter in the world... thats why I say you got it reversed, we've gone from a society where one could say no, to a society where 51% tell 100% how to live irregardless of their rights... don't think of the 3 branches of government as 51% majorities voting... think of them as 3 separate but equal bodies all having the right to say NO to one another... thats why the presidents decision to go around the other two branches with executive orders and re-write laws is so shocking and horrifying... because we're losing the republic so many have died for... I pledge allegiance to the flag, of the united states of america, and to the REPUBLIC, for which it stands.... P.S. in a majority rules, you can force that baker to bake things he doesn't want to, the majority said he had to, in a republic you could not, because he said NO...
ooo ooo my turn... you say we should program self-driving cars to evade hitting bigfoot... what if bigfoot hacks the cars and makes them all drive off a cliff... errr wait you actually can hack cars and make them drive off cliffs now... I guess I'm not that good at this make believe stuff... [video]http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-internet-cars-hacking-0727-20150724-story.html[/video] car makers promised us this couldn't happen either... yet it did... crazy... (now I'm not trying to say the other guy wasn't a little fanatic, but never say never these days, cause everything seems to be happening lol) [video=youtube;8CtjhWhw2I8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CtjhWhw2I8[/video] lol I forgot how much I loved the outer limits...
Both, because politics (part of information) is revolutionary in all ways. Because all information from the media (including political information) is surpressing self thinking in people. Society is at war with new information, means the peaceful information is deep in the mind, constantly held deep down as soon as you watch tv or receive information from the media. A society don't need information that is harming itself with, a society need information that is healing itself with, and if you look a century back in time it was much less information (but you can't go back to for example 1800 in amounts of information abruptly or suddenly, need slowly being reduced to a peaceful level) Because too much information means too much instability going on (a sudden change would do the same) Most people have lost their personal uniqueness (even while they believe that is not the case, but it is, because the media is the dominating force in this info world)
Is this your quote? "These gun nuts are going to kill somebody if this keeps up. These fatties need to pack up, go home, and watch their FOX News."
