VIDEO: Pack Of Black Thugs Surround White 13-Year-Old… It Does Not End Well

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Grokmaster, Aug 19, 2015.

  1. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, similar to that.
     
  2. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your equivocations are hilarious. So you are basically conceding that the majority of wars in the 20th century were waged by white people. Apparently, black people have only recently become inherently violent. But it was white people that were inherently violent in the 20th century.

    Maybe you are confused as to what "inherently" means in this context.

    ...with a tiny fraction of the deaths.

    Are you still trying to claim black people are inherently more violent?
     
  3. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The OP was the one implying that blacks were savage animals. You didn't seem to have a problem with the OP's confirmation bias. Now you are complaining about arguments that nobody has made.

    No one here has made the claim that blacks are pure and innocent. It's something you invented out of thin air.

    Can we agree that it is possible for black people to not be savage animals and inherently violent even if they are not pure and innocent?

    - - - Updated - - -

    I am responding to the slander of the OP. If you really think I am baiting people, you should report me.

    Prove it.

    - - - Updated - - -

    It is possible you're all racist. It doesn't have to be one or the other.
     
  4. Thirty6BelowZero

    Thirty6BelowZero Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2015
    Messages:
    27,109
    Likes Received:
    11,629
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Do you find MMA fighters and boxers to be relevant to street thugs that can't target a solo white man without ganging up on him?
     
  5. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
  6. ElDiablo

    ElDiablo Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    5,193
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I see you didn't post any. Why? Because there are no statistics proving poor people are more violent. There are many statistics showing blacks are more violent.
     
  7. Brewskier

    Brewskier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2011
    Messages:
    48,910
    Likes Received:
    9,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Any genocides happening in Europe or any other white countries right now?

    So because there is violence in the history of white peoples, we shouldn't pay attention to the extraordinary level of violence and dysfunction coming from the black community. Is that your argument?

    Unless you're willing to argue that blacks are inherently less violent than whites, I don't see any reason to assume black countries wouldn't have committed the same acts of aggression, or worse, on the world stage if they had ever ascended to a position to do so. As it stands, no black country has ever been in such a position at least in the modern era. We can, however, extrapolate the non-stop barbaric tribal warfare occurring on these countries and guess what would happen if their influence stretched across the world, as white countries have.

    Your responses do not refute that blacks are committing a disproportionate amount of violence in the US, as well as in other countries where they comprise a sizeable population. Whether or not this violence is "inherent" is debatable, but the fact that they are committing this level of violence is not debatable at all, unless you're willing to ignore statistics and facts.
     
  8. ElDiablo

    ElDiablo Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    5,193
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Crime Genes:

    Crime genes
    The two genes associated with violent repeat offenders were the MAOA gene and a variant of cadherin 13 (CDH13)
    The MAOA gene codes for the enzyme monoamine oxidase A, which is important for controlling the amount of dopamine and serotonin in the brain
    CDH13 has previously been associated with substance abuse and ADHD
    Those classified as non-violent offenders did not have this genetic profile


    http://conservative-headlines.com/2012/06/does-maoa-gene-make-black-people-more-violent/
     
  9. Brewskier

    Brewskier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2011
    Messages:
    48,910
    Likes Received:
    9,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  10. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Uh huh

    But wait, it gets better.

    That is actually pretty funny...poor whites are actually slightly more likely to commit violent crimes than poor blacks. That is news even to me.

    So when accounting for socio-economic factors, blacks are not more violent at all. If anything, it's actually the other way around.
     
  11. ElDiablo

    ElDiablo Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    5,193
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Your links do not woik.

    - - - Updated - - -

    What the left will not tell you about black crime>>>http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=5137
     
  12. Brewskier

    Brewskier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2011
    Messages:
    48,910
    Likes Received:
    9,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm not the one trying to obfuscate black criminality and violence in the US with world wars that have taken place between developed countries in the past. When you have to go to that level to make excuses for black crime, you know you're on shaky ground.

    I'm doing no such thing. There were far more than 4 wars in the 20th century which, so far, comprise the entirety of your argument. There were many wars amongst Arabs, blacks, Hispanics, and Asians that, somehow, don't factor into your white-guilt derived argument.

    http://www.war-memorial.net/wars_all.asp

    Strawman. Black people in Africa have had a lot of violence in their history.

    Only if you're willing to ignore all of the other violence committed by other groups, which wouldn't be a surprise for the pro-minority, white guilt contingent.

    Considering the "context" (i.e, your argument) is complete nonsense, the definition doesn't really matter in this application.

    Add up the death toll on all those wars you're ignoring. Your arguments that are based on ignorance and guessing are not very convincing.

    When have I claimed that?

    I don't know how much of their criminality is based on genetics and how much is based on culture and environment. It's an interesting question and I hope it receives more study than the white guilt crowd allows for.
     
  13. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Um...your source is not really supporting your argument.

    White violent crime - 254,620
    Black violent crime - 163,670

    That is from your own source. The vast majority are white. If Hispanics are included, that does not bode well for whites, since hispanics would be LOWERING the curve...since they are statistically less likely to commit violent crimes than whites.

    My entire argument rests on the assumption that poor people are more likely to commit violent crimes, and that a far larger percentage of blacks are poor than whites. Your chart does not separate offenders by socio-economic bracket. My source in post #85 does however.
     
  14. Brewskier

    Brewskier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2011
    Messages:
    48,910
    Likes Received:
    9,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's your subjective opinion that the OP was implying that all blacks were savage animals. Why am I supposed to take your arbitrary assumptions as credible?

    That premise has to be established in order for some of your arguments to make sense. You're just too afraid to commit to the idea, so you dance around it.

    Sure, I've never said they were all that way. Just far too many.
     
  15. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is what is in that link:

    Poor urban blacks (51.3 per 1,000) had rates of violence similar to poor urban whites (56.4 per 1,000).

    Is that what the left is not telling us?
     
  16. Brewskier

    Brewskier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2011
    Messages:
    48,910
    Likes Received:
    9,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    As I just noted, "white violent crime" contains both whites and Hispanics.

    Prove that Hispanics "are statistically less likely to commit violent crimes than whites." That certainly isn't the case in Chicago, where the city is divided almost evenly between whites, Hispanics, and blacks:

    [​IMG]

    And it does bode very well for whites. Take a look at the violent crime rates. 49.3% of the murders were committed by blacks alone, who comprise about 13% of the population. Whites+Hispanics are ~80% of the population and they commit about the same amount of murders as blacks.

    But your argument doesn't work, for reasons I've already explained. If it was simply a function of how poor someone is, then Hispanics would be committing the same amount of violent crime, if not more. But they don't. They are more likely to drop out of high school, less likely to get a college degree, and have about the same amount of poverty is blacks, yet they commit less violent crime. That's a very inconvenient fact for your argument. We can also look at the poorest areas of the country, which are usually white areas in Appalachia, and not find nearly the same level of violent crime that you would find in any poor black area in the country.
     
  17. ElDiablo

    ElDiablo Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    5,193
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You seem not to understand what victimization means....your links show that poor people are more apt to be victims of crime ...not perpetrators of crime.


    victimization

    Also found in: Medical, Legal, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
    vic·tim·ize
    (vĭk′tə-mīz′)
    tr.v. vic·tim·ized, vic·tim·iz·ing, vic·tim·iz·es
    To make a victim of, especially:
    a. To injure or kill.
    b. To cheat or defraud.
     
  18. Brewskier

    Brewskier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2011
    Messages:
    48,910
    Likes Received:
    9,641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    LOL, nice catch. It's always funny when they don't understand what their own sources are saying.
     
  19. Thirty6BelowZero

    Thirty6BelowZero Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2015
    Messages:
    27,109
    Likes Received:
    11,629
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, I'm still talking about a group of one color targeting one member of another. You're going to have to try harder.

    I'm glad you brought that up though, even if it's 13 years old. Did you notice the charges those scumbags received?

    Federal civil rights violations and felony mob action. Think that ever happens to deadbeats like the mob in this video? Of course not.

    Thanks for sharing.
     
  20. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You are making a claim that is false (that black people are inherently more violent than white people). I am refuting that claim with evidence.

    So in only 4 wars white people cause more deaths than all the wars waged by non-whites combined. You've convinced me lol

    Any time you question facts from racists it's always because of "white guilt" apparently.

    So have white people. Point?

    The vast majority of deaths in the 20th century were not caused by wars waged by non-whites. You can attempt to spin it all you like, but thats an objective fact.

    Your only counter seems to be "omg but non whites did it too!!"...yeah...so what? The whole point of this argument was to demonstrate that black people are not inherently more violent than white people. No one has ever made the argument that non-whites are saints. Thats something you people fabricated from nothing.

    So you agree that they are not inherently more violent. Good.

    If we are in agreement that they are not, then there is no argument, and I don't know why you are responding to me at all.
     
  21. CRUE CAB

    CRUE CAB New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2013
    Messages:
    5,952
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh, we are all racists. LOLOLOLOL.
     
  22. Coolia

    Coolia New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2014
    Messages:
    1,187
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, there's something we won't see in the MSM, cuz only black lives matter.
     
  23. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It certainly is. He is free to deny it at any time, and explicitly state it to remove any ambiguity. So far he hasn't.

    IMO, it has been established. You yourself have repeated made that implication.

    Are you now admitting that no one has made the claim or even implied that black people are pure and innocent?

    And you admitted it is not something inherent in the black race. Progress!
     
  24. Songbird

    Songbird New Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2015
    Messages:
    963
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Then post even a smidgeon of valid evidence.

    Refute this: Of the violent crimes in the US between races, black and white, the black is the perp, and the white the victim, 85% of the time.
     
  25. ElDiablo

    ElDiablo Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    5,193
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48

    Liberals always trot out the 'ALL' argument when the negatives of any group are discussed....say something about islamic terrorism and they cannot reply fast enough that not ALL muslims are terrorists.....same way with blacks.

    First of all that is a fallacious argument to begin with.......I usually respond to such nonsense by saying not all Germans were nazis but look what happened there.
     

Share This Page