ESPN: Radical Islam Fine by Us

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Grokmaster, Aug 27, 2015.

  1. iJoeTime

    iJoeTime Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sad but true. He is also a staunch denier of evolution, the calling card of a right wing idiot.
     
  2. Grokmaster

    Grokmaster Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    55,099
    Likes Received:
    13,310
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because one should not be allowed to acknowledge our nation's enemies?
     
  3. reallybigjohnson

    reallybigjohnson Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Messages:
    8,849
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Schilling even specified RADICAL Islam. If he had just twittied Islam without the qualifier then I could see him being in trouble. What I don't get is that by definition if you think that what Schilling said was wrong then you are for rape of little girls, selling women as wives and beheading people of other faiths or just because they are the wrong type of Muslim. ESPN has ever right to fire him but they shot themselves in the foot on this one because now ESPN is actually advocating raping little girls by default.
     
  4. Grokmaster

    Grokmaster Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    55,099
    Likes Received:
    13,310
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As opposed to a believer that evolution is "proven fact" the calling card of the low information, zero scientific knowledge, left.

    So radical islamists do not exist either, in Leftgoofyworld, and/or we must not mention them?
     
  5. iJoeTime

    iJoeTime Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL. I love right wingers. Please never ever change.
     
  6. cupAsoup

    cupAsoup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2015
    Messages:
    7,879
    Likes Received:
    899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where did I say that? If you want to cuddle up to all things schilling, go for it. Have anything substantive to say?
     
  7. iJoeTime

    iJoeTime Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I've seen some retarded strawmen in my day, but wow. Kudos to you Sir, well done.
     
  8. reallybigjohnson

    reallybigjohnson Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Messages:
    8,849
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
    By censoring someone who opposed radical Islam by definition they show support for it. Germans who stood by and didn't do or say anything to try and stop the holocaust were in part responsible for it. Just as people that punish or criticize other people for standing up to radical Islam.....and remember he specified radical Islam.......are in part responsible for ISIS continuing to rape little girls. Anyone and everyone that believes what Schilling posted was wrong is an advocate for genocide and child rape.

    So I want to to answer a very simple question. Is radical Islam repressive and violent? Is radical Islam something that should be opposed or should people just stand by and let ISIS rape little girls and behead people?
     
  9. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,165
    Likes Received:
    20,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yeah, people like pissing their money away. It doesn't mean any true sports fanatic thinks ESPN is a quality company anymore. Retreads upon retreads and they have absolutely no true analytical expertise.
     
  10. iJoeTime

    iJoeTime Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What retreads? Analytical expertise in what field/sport specifically? Who does it better, specifically?

    Please no vague half answers this time like when you were saying Women shouldn't be able to vote.
     
  11. reallybigjohnson

    reallybigjohnson Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Messages:
    8,849
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The fact that you can't even bring yourself to say that radical Islam is bad because they rape little girls and justify it with the Koran and they behead people in the name of Allah is what is really worrying. You didn't answer the question. Is radical Islam repressive and violent and should people oppose it? Should a group of people that rape little girls and behead people be criticized at all? You criticized Schilling for condemning radical Islam there is no gray area here, that means that you obviously support radical Islam. By extension you don't seem to have any problems with their actions which include child rape and beheadings.
     
  12. iJoeTime

    iJoeTime Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Doubling down on crazy I see. Don't include me on any further of your sickening rants about child rape or saying I support it. You've been reported.
     
  13. reallybigjohnson

    reallybigjohnson Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Messages:
    8,849
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Once again, is radical Islam violent and repressive? Schilling condemned radical Islam, why can't you condemn it? I can only assume that you don't agree with Schilling and have no problem with radical Islam and their actions. Everyone on this thread is waiting for you to condemn radical Islam and you just can't bring yourself to do it. But you have no problem criticizing someone who did condemn them. What other possible explanation is there then that you have no problems with radical Islam.
     
  14. iJoeTime

    iJoeTime Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Keep punching that retarded strawman.

    You've been reported for your sickening obsession with child rape. Please leave me out of your offensive rape fantasies.
     
  15. reallybigjohnson

    reallybigjohnson Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Messages:
    8,849
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Let's remind everyone what you posted on the first page of this thread shall we?

    So according to you, people that oppose radical Islam and beheadings and burnings and child rape are apparently bigots. That means you don't agree with people that oppose radical Islam and the beheadings and burnings and child rape. So answer the question already. Was Schilling wrong for condeming radical Islam or was he correct in condeming radical Islam and the beheadings, burnings and child rape?
     
  16. iJoeTime

    iJoeTime Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Reported for continuing to include me in your disgusting rape fantasies and claiming I support radical Islam, which I've never said in a million (*)(*)(*)(*)ing years. ( I hate all religions).
     
  17. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,165
    Likes Received:
    20,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The entire department. At best they hire people with former connections to the sport leagues(and this, mostly because they can't find a job anymore.) But you find that there's a whole big difference from playing or scouting or coaching or being a GM than there is to talking about that stuff. ESPN provides less insight than I can pick up from my own individual observations.

    People like watching sports, and like one poster said it's almost pretty much included in every cable package, so yeah. When you have a monopoly on something, you tend to profit by default. It doesn't mean ESPN is a good company anymore. That ship sailed years ago.

    Also my point on that issue, and any other issue has never been vague half-answers. US women are single voter issues, as such I find them incredibly unintelligent. You take out women and all of a sudden you take out a chunk of the whining we have going on. "What can we do for women's health!?"

    Women are so stupid in today's politics, I could pose as a populist on "women's issues"(which would mean taking these economically stupid positions on women reproductivity) and even though I don't actually believe these things, just the very claim alone would have women in my corner.

    Because they're stupid, gullible and incredibly naive when it comes to politics. There's more important things than making sure your tampon is the cheapest in the world. So it's simple: Either the women in the US can try gaining some intelligence points or otherwise their votes dillute the political reality of the US.
     
  18. reallybigjohnson

    reallybigjohnson Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Messages:
    8,849
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You criticized someone for condeming radical Islam and you then proceeded to call everyone that agrees with that condemnation internet bigots. Those are your own words. You said that people that oppose radical Islam are bigots. That can only mean that you support radical Islam. Is this true or would you like to ammend your statement and also condemn radical Islam...............like the rest of the civilized and educated world does. This is the problem with liberals. They are completely incapable of critical thinking and are unable to admit when they are clearly in the wrong. Everyone else reading this is wondering why you and a handful of others are so quick to defend radical Islam and why you would call people that oppose radical Islam bigots?
     
  19. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,165
    Likes Received:
    20,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, but it has no baring on my political thoughts towards women. I'm sure for example there are "male health issues", if there are I don't care and if there are, I'll find a way to support it on my own dime. To me, the government, political positions and arguments are a hell of a lot more sophisicated than that. It's little more than a kid asking his/her parent if they can buy their favorite toy for them.

    I feel such government-economic control would be counterproductive to the economy(while in general, I do want to tighten things up a bit. There's a thing as getting too involved). The companies that make the tampons and birth control would be upset that their technlogy which costs a hell of a lot more than ours, is being valued the "same" and therefore there's no profitability, maybe a loss.

    All you have to do is slip some rubber on a guy, female contraceptives are a whole different, much more costlier story and yes they do more. It's precisely because they do more, that they cost more. At best, I could say every contraceptive will be at least 50% covered by insurance. Reducing the price in half might hurt, but the profits spread to insurance companies as well. Hopefully the "cheaper" prices will result in buying in bulk.

    Though again, because of the differences between men and women I wonder if women contraceptives can be reduplicated at the same speed as say Magnum off the shelves of a chain store. But nevertheless, this is the closest I'll ever come to a "populist" position, which gives them their damned free candy.

    My big issue? Even having given them their candy, it's done nothing for the country. How women operate in politics, and how men operate in politics are two different things. Women think of government as an extra pocket purse, a male's bigger purchasing power. Men still relate politics to country issues.
     
  20. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,644
    Likes Received:
    13,766
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Radical religionists of every ilk have historically had their day in the sun.... whether they were slaughtering the Cathars or burning witches.

    Remember the Polynesians and the Aztecs.. the Inquisitions and so on.

    I think perhaps the moral of the story is .. don't let your religion make you crazy.
     
  21. reallybigjohnson

    reallybigjohnson Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Messages:
    8,849
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You can get 28 days worth of birth control for less than $10. My girlfriend pays for the higher end brand and even that is less than $20 a month. That is actually way cheaper per unit than condoms and they last all day instead of just one time.
     
  22. reallybigjohnson

    reallybigjohnson Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Messages:
    8,849
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I just want him to actually condemn radical Islam. The poster actually accused people that condemn radical Islam of being bigots, this includes much of the Muslim world by the way. He is either clearly incapable of admitting how foolish he looks (meaning he isn't capable of actual learning or critical thought) or he actually agrees with radical Islam and believes that what they do in the name of Allah is A-OK.
     
  23. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,644
    Likes Received:
    13,766
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why are you talking about tampons?
     
  24. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,644
    Likes Received:
    13,766
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Radical Islam is an aberration and an ugly one to be sure......We have problems with these crazies and our problems are NOTHING compared to their threat to most of the Muslim world.
     
  25. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,165
    Likes Received:
    20,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Because Ijoe here brought up the thing about women. I just wanted to make it clear why I find liberal politics to be incredibly distasteful. It's like the old saying "forest for the trees." Bigger fish to fry out there, but not according to MSNBC and crew.

    So can anyone tell me what these liberal women are complaining about? Do they really want it totally free? Is that about the gist of it?
     

Share This Page