evolution theory is wrong

Discussion in 'Science' started by hkisdog, Sep 28, 2015.

  1. hkisdog

    hkisdog Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,466
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A) if Darwin was right, then evolution theory is wrong.
    he said if in future we cant find enough fossils to support evolution theory .
    then evolution theory is wrong.

    there is no fossils to support evolution theory .
    there are only a few fake ones.

    B) There were fossils to support The Cambrian Period did exist.
    since The Cambrian Period did exist, Then how come evolution theory is true??
    Darwin' he said he can not explain this.
     
  2. hkisdog

    hkisdog Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,466
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    we all know that hkisdog is very great man.
     
  3. verystormy

    verystormy Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    28
    So, when I am out working today, and I see several thousand fossils, they are wrong?

    I am not sure what you are saying about the Cambrian? Are you saying that because there are fossils from the Cambrian, evolution is wrong?
     
  4. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    there are many transitional fossils.

    you simply forgot to look.
     
  5. perdidochas

    perdidochas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    27,293
    Likes Received:
    4,346
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Darwin never said that. In fact, he talked about how incomplete the fossil record necessarily had to be. Darwin would be pleased by the current fossil record. He would feel that he was correct, more or less.
     
  6. Object227

    Object227 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,950
    Likes Received:
    147
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Or he simply decides not to trust what scientists report as evidence for evolution b/c the theory doesn't fit his preconceived preferences. He likely wants creationism to be true so he will dismiss what he regards as "claims" about evolution.
     
  7. jackson33

    jackson33 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    2,445
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    When someone can explain an error in the genetic make up of all life, that is inconsistent with evolution, then I'll listen. As it stands today it's consistent, 1-2-3-4 and so on leads to human life.
     
  8. Junkieturtle

    Junkieturtle Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    15,838
    Likes Received:
    7,352
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Evolution is the best theory that currently exists to explain the history and diversity of life on Earth. It matches the evidence that's been found.
     
  9. SMDBill

    SMDBill Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,715
    Likes Received:
    260
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Transitional fossils? Did you know that with each new fossil type discovered there must be additional transitional fossils between that new one and the previous one? There is a lot of support for evolution and even evangelicals like the Pope have concurred.
     
  10. hkisdog

    hkisdog Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,466
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    do you know what are you talking about?
     
  11. hkisdog

    hkisdog Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,466
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    He likely wants creationism to be true.
    -----------------------------
    you get a wrong idea.
    it is no problem for me to accept that , if we human, hongki, monkeys really have the same root.

    but are there real transitional fossils? if yes, please post photo here,
    Those so-called transitional fossils are all fake.
     
  12. Object227

    Object227 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,950
    Likes Received:
    147
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    What is fake about them?? Are you claiming the species in question are not or cannot be a transition from an ancestor in the past? Are you claiming it's not even a fossil?? Who would be motivated to fake a transitional fossil?? What's the motive?
     
  13. antb0y

    antb0y Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,042
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm not sure if you understand what a transitional species is.
    Are you expecting a photo of a real crocoduck?
     
  14. hkisdog

    hkisdog Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,466
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    To antb0y, you dont know what you are talking about
    if evolution theory is true,
    why you cant find a fossil of transitional species.

    - - - Updated - - -


    Then just post a photo of a fossil of transitional species.
     
  15. antb0y

    antb0y Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,042
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Ah, your standard reply to everything.

    Here's one:

    Archaeopteryx.jpg
     
  16. Casper

    Casper Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Messages:
    12,540
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You are wasting your time, they cherry pick their "science" and are too stupid to grasp the fact that they are not only discounting evolution they are discounting every earthy science at the same time and actually believe the earth is 6000 years old. Flat earthers are a waste of effort, they simply refuse to acknowledge anything that does not support their hypothesis, in other words they do not even understand science itself.
     
  17. antb0y

    antb0y Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,042
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    I know. I guess I'm bored enough to play along.
     
  18. ryobi

    ryobi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2013
    Messages:
    3,247
    Likes Received:
    373
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Darwin had fossils in 1859 but there was no such thing as molecular biology in 1859.

    When Darwin published the origin of species in 1859 he could have never predicted the emergence of molecular biology 70 years later, yet molecular biology explains the mechanism of evolution and is proof of evolution just like Demitri Mendelev couldn’t have predicted in 1869 that Einstein’s and Bohr’s quantum theory would explain the mechanism of periodicity in his periodic table 40 years later. In fact, Mendelev did not believe in anything he could not see.
     
  19. hkisdog

    hkisdog Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,466
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    sir, I know the earth is 4.5 billions years old,
    you know as little as a kid,
    once you know a little thing you want to a show? :)

    Casper, you are not very smart. you cant think.
    you just believe your teachers 100%, you think they are 100% right, That's all. hahaha.
     
  20. SMDBill

    SMDBill Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,715
    Likes Received:
    260
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Here's a link to many human transitional fossils with images and their ages are identified.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_human_evolution_fossils
     
  21. hkisdog

    hkisdog Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,466
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If evolution theory is right.
    Then there should be tons of such fossils.
    but you only get a few, and almost all of them cant be trusted.

    can you explain that how the fossil proves evolution theory .
     
  22. antb0y

    antb0y Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,042
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    You're the one who is challenging a widely accepted theory, so maybe you should start explaining why the fossils we have "can't be trusted".
     
  23. Casper

    Casper Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Messages:
    12,540
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Were did I ever state the Earth was 6000 years old?
    Grow up.
     
  24. verystormy

    verystormy Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    28
    To the OP, I suggest you do a little reading about palaeontology and stop reading the internet too much. A couple of visits to a decent natural history museum might also be a good idea.

    As for your comment "do I know what I am talking about?" Well, as a senior geologist, I hope so.
     
  25. hkisdog

    hkisdog Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,466
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Casper, you make yourself a fool here

    you teach people the world is not 6000 years old in #13.

    maybe you can not understand your own post at all,

    and everyone can read #23, I did not say that you stated the Earth was 6000 years old.

    Do you know that you need to think before talking?
     

Share This Page