The Myth Of White Supremacists™

Discussion in 'Race Relations' started by Jack Napier, Oct 4, 2015.

  1. DavidMK

    DavidMK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2015
    Messages:
    2,685
    Likes Received:
    690
    Trophy Points:
    113
    White pride on its own isn't racsist. It's when they think that fact alone makes them better than non-whites that makes them racist. Expanding on that point to cover the op, it's when they think that fact on its own makes them better than everyone else that makes them WS.
     
  2. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,462
    Likes Received:
    14,676
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ive never spoke to a WPer who didn't hate blacks, or Jews, or Gays, or Asians, etc..

    the non-hateful WPer simply doesn't exist.
     
  3. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Sadly, that is generally true.
     
  4. ImNotOliver

    ImNotOliver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    Messages:
    14,692
    Likes Received:
    6,643
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Being that the brain is a physical entity and thus mental attributes are also physical. When people get old their mental abilities tend to decrease in a simular manner to their failing physical abilities. Likewise, when one gets sick with, for instance, influenza, one's mental abilities are just as degraded as one's physical abilities.

    The use it or lose it part I can agree but the other part not so much. That is because it seems to me that a person born with a higher intellect will tend to do more intellectual things and thus exercise their mental functions beyond that of their peers.

    Studies on twins tend to show a stronger nature link. Also, take as an example in my family. Neither of my parents did well in school as children and my brothers followed in their footsteps. However something was different with me and I easily went through school and college with A's. Clearly something within me gave me a greater intelligence than my brothers who were raised in the same environment.

    In the next generation my brothers' children performed academically about as well their parents and their parents' parents. Yet, my children, who had the benefit of my "smart gene" did as well as I did academically.


    You are missing the fact that in Medieval times royalty drank out of leaded cups which led to idiot sons of kings.





    I think that certain individuals in certain races are more likely to be of higher intelligence than most people in most races.
     
  5. ImNotOliver

    ImNotOliver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    Messages:
    14,692
    Likes Received:
    6,643
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not true. Look at high school scores. In America, even blacks who live in well to do neighborhoods tend to do less well, academically, than average white kids.
     
  6. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,462
    Likes Received:
    14,676
    Trophy Points:
    113
    that's a cultural-caused phenomenon.

    3 generations of black middle class families will see their children perform as well as whites, if properly motivated.
     
  7. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Perhaps the difference in brain size is a factor.

    The brains of African-Americans are 5% smaller than the brains of Whites and 6% smaller than East Asians, according to studies of brain weight at autopsy, endocranial volume of empty skulls, head size measurements by the U.S. military and NASA, and two dozen MRI volumetric studies.

    That is a genetic trait because even malnourished Asians from poor countries have a larger brain on average than well fed blacks from western countries.
     
  8. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0

    How can you presume to know what anyone may 'think', unless in fact you ask and they tell you?
     
  9. Independant thinker

    Independant thinker Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2015
    Messages:
    2,196
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Don't bother Jack. White people mostly aren't any good anyway. You write very well and you are correct about everything, but it's just pointless.
     
  10. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Here’s a question. Muse over it. There are two kids at school. One is super bright when it comes to maths, the other can barely do simple maths despite being the same age and having had the same teaching. Do you accept that with the best will in the world, one kid has it nailed and the other does not, or do you create some alternative reality in which you pretend that both kids are equally good at maths?

    When you have two lads, one athletic and with good balance and the other obese and out of shape, do you tell the latter that he has the same chance to be a pro athlete as the former, or do you accept the reality that the first guy has it and the other does not?

    In cases of the very worse examples, you might be able to improve them a bit. But you will never make them into something they are not and no amount of pretending and alternate reality is going to last, least not for any period of time, not before people just start to laugh as it becomes so visibly absurd.



    I keep reading this thing about “white people think”. How do you presume to know what anyone thinks unless first you ask, and that includes those you may weakly label as ‘racist’ or WS. Rather than assume, ask them. Rather than guess, ask them. Rather than read between the lines, ask fair questions and you hopefully get fair answers.

    White people are by far the numerical minority in this World. Why would we NOT want to preserve our own culture, ways, heritage and unique people’s? Everyone else wants to, so why wouldn’t we? Do we call Jews Jewish supremacists when they marry only other Jews? Do we call blacks African supremacists when they want to preserve their traditions? Do we talk about Japanese supremacists when the Japanese put their own interests first?


    Of course we do not. Its white people and ONLY white people that get called ‘supremacist’ and ‘extreme’ for wanting exactly the same as all other races and peoples. Why wouldn’t whites see those that would deny us that as a threat?

    - - - Updated - - -

    I look to the potential minus the parasite.
     
  11. Independant thinker

    Independant thinker Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2015
    Messages:
    2,196
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [MENTION=53333]Jack Napier[/MENTION]

    sorry I said that. I was in a grumpy mood. I realize you put a lot of good writing in this thread.
     
  12. DavidMK

    DavidMK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2015
    Messages:
    2,685
    Likes Received:
    690
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm proud of being white, my ancestors beat the Romans and conquered North America so I have reason to be. I don't have an issue with blacks. Jews are awesome unless you're dealing with the Zionists and their ugly, underserved nationalism but that's political. Gays have great fashion sense and seem to have an affinity for the arts. Asians are really smart for some reason.

    Don't make absolute statements, it takes just 1 to make you a lier.
     
  13. DavidMK

    DavidMK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2015
    Messages:
    2,685
    Likes Received:
    690
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because I have and they have? Lots of honest racists in the world.
     
  14. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,462
    Likes Received:
    14,676
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the Romans were white.
     
  15. DavidMK

    DavidMK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2015
    Messages:
    2,685
    Likes Received:
    690
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And? That diminishes my ancestors' victory how exactly?
     
  16. Giftedone

    Giftedone Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    64,062
    Likes Received:
    13,585
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am saying that 20% is way low. Without proper external stimuli the possibilities due to Genetics will not be realized. I think you confused what I meant by "environment" . What was meant is external stimuli which includes training, education and so on.
     
  17. haribol

    haribol New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    679
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    White supremacy is a total wrong notion and they are not supreme at all. They are average and not gifted with anything special. They are rich and some are more educated not just because they have something the rest of other races do not have just because they have some opportunity to evolve and one has to read a lot of scientific sources to understand this fact. Asians are not less intelligent. Indians, Chinese are really great thinkers, speaking historically and now they are falling somewhat behind for some reasons. But if you read the data of Harvard both Chinese and Indian students are outperforming their counterparts white people.
     
  18. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,462
    Likes Received:
    14,676
    Trophy Points:
    113
    white people defeated other white people, so it was a victory and a defeat
     
  19. Giftedone

    Giftedone Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    64,062
    Likes Received:
    13,585
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Mental abilities are not the same as physical abilities. Of course the brain to some degree relies on the physical but there is a huge difference between the two in relation to actualization of genetic potential.

    A person born with the "potential" for higher intellect will lose that potential if it is not nurtured properly.

    A study on twins does not study the nurture component. Also just because twins have "relatively" the same stimulus does not mean that stimulus is exactly the same.

    Just because you got A's and your siblings did not does not mean your siblings did not have a similar potential (although sometimes this can be the case).

    Way too simplified.

    Are you sure that your parenting techniques were exactly the same as your brothers ?
    There are gazillions of examples of smart parents (who did not drink from lead cups) that had stupid kids. You are making me doubt your intellectual honesty here (denial of the obvious).

    Extending individual genetic differences to an entire race is sketchy. Regardless any difference that may exists is neutered by environmental factors.

    Folks who are not educated in general remain ignorant regardless of Genetic potential.

    Just look at the US
     
  20. DavidMK

    DavidMK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2015
    Messages:
    2,685
    Likes Received:
    690
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only if I was part Roman, I'm not.
     
  21. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Honesty is a virtue. Well, for most people’s it is. Anyway, ‘they’ aren’t here, but I am. So please address the rest of what was written.
     
  22. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0

    As weird as this might sound, I have less issue with the crazy Israeli Jews(of which there are many), and far more of an issue with their non- Israeli, Marxist, cuckolding, championing for open borders type Jews
     
  23. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I did stress 20% was only my personal estimate not an exact figure. If you say 30%, let’ split the difference and call it 25%. It would still mean that a person’s core character and many of his abilities have a genetic basis and not a social basis.
     
  24. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just a message like that proves the message claim is false. No high intelligence person would post a message of such self-boasting on racial terms. Social awkwardness isn't very intelligence.
     
  25. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who are your ancestors that you boast of having superior killing abilities? What have YOU done demonstrating YOUR superior intellect? Who have you conquered and defeated?
     

Share This Page