Chuck Todd: GOP Candidates Launched ‘Premeditated Attack’ Against Debate Moderators

If Terry McAullife can't defend it but we still have single digit IQ internet trolls defending it, I'm pretty sure everyone can see the issue.

- - - Updated - - -

MSNBC?

I rest my case.

- - - Updated - - -

Surely, you jest! Fox has proven itself to be as brain dead as all the others. Get that silly little fluffnugget, Megyn, on a DNC debate panel and watch the lovefest begin!

 

Do you live in an alternate reality! Did you hear the audience applause? That was what America was doing...Americans are sick of the biased media. It is NOT whining to call it for what it is. Stop getting your talking points from the Liberal rags. They are sending you down the wrong road. If that had been Hillary on the stage, Libs would have been crying bloody murder and you know it.

 

i really dont care about liberals. i dont care about the type of questions at all. i care about someone that can handle them selves and the repubs solution will be to whine when someone gets up in front of the UN and makes an anti US speech.

 

Who plays the victim better than Hillary? She did it at the Benghazi hearing, when in reality, the only victims were the 4 Americans she did not protect. But she made it all about her to deflect from what she really did. She is a mastermind of deception, but she does NOT deserve to be president. She covers up her many inadequacies by complaining and whining. She was a terrible SoS and will be a terrible president. I want you to listen to how many times she will play the gender card as if that alone ENTITLES her to be president. That way she thinks people won't look at her lousy record.

 

Agreed - they can do that. But let's look at who is acting Presidential and where they are currently poll wise. Rubio? Fiorina? Even Christie and Jeb for the most part are acting Presidential. What's it getting them in the media other than ignored?

 

No, it isn't. And here's a news flash; it's not about your opinion of Cruz, either.

 

hillary was not at the gop debate, she is a democrat

 

I'm hard pressed to come up with a bigger moron on Sunday morning TV than Chuck Todd. His constant chin butting is distracting and his teeth are filthy. He's a nasty piece of work.

 

I can't wait for the next Democratic debate, hosted by...Rachel Maddow! Could they have made it any easier for them?

 

I agree, the greater part of Republican policy is over reaction. Especially foreign policy.

 

The most corrupt way of life is found in the entertainment industry, like movies, theatre, news media.

The great majority are drug addicts, drunks, sodomites, lesbians, you name it... the lowest behavior found in humans.

Of course they will attack the conservative man who defends moral values.

Chuck Todd belongs to the low behavior world, and his opinions will be guided to attack anyone against his own way of life and the way of life of his friends. Besides this fact, if by any reason he is "straight" and doesn't obey the order from above to criticize conservatives, he can be fired.

I watched how he started his TV career and how well he managed to present his diagrams in the electoral race. As such, he had to be impartial, just showing the States were Democrats and Republicans were winning.

But, later on he was offered the job to give political opinions. But his opinions must be following what the "boss" told him to say.

Since then, Chuck Todd is nothing but another puppet.

 

CNBC actually, but Fox set the tone in the first episode of the GOP game show by doing exactly what the right is so mad at CNBC for doing!

 

I would like to know what McAullife actually said, not what the right wing bloggers claim he said.

CNBC not MSNBC, they are not the same.

Glad you admit that Fox did the same thing CNBC did. But then, the candidates themselves have been doing the same thing to each other for months.

CNBC didn't invent name calling (Trump leads, everyone else immitates), lying (Carson), and making ridiculous claims (all the front runners).

It's ridiculous seeing right wingers whine that they want substantive debates, when they put the candidates with the least amount of substance at the top of the polls.

CNBC didn't put charletans like Trump and Carson at the top of the polls. The talk radio right did.

 

Today, the Fox political analysts were masking interviews to Republican candidates, even to those who have no chance at all because they have zero support by Americans, but their own families and close friends.

They put speeches were these candidates claimed that the best for the job are the ones who are inside the political group, and not so the "outsiders".

The panel avoided the mention of Carson and Trump.

From now on, we might see that Fox might try to manipulate the news and events of the candidates to lean the preference on candidates who are politicians already.

It is obvious that Clinton can beat any Republican candidate but Trump.

And apparently many millions of dollars are cards under the table passing from hand to hand in the game to avoid this confrontation.

 

I'm convinced this was the best thing that could happen to the GOP candidates. It allows them to avoid talking about real legitimate issues. Now they can run around saying "vote for me because .... the media!"

 

It's all the salt water he's ingested from surfing that has destroyed a potion of his brain.

 

Yes, they ARE afraid, because Fox has the largest cable audience and they would be easily exposed for the frauds they are to more people than they want to be.

 

That's why Kasich is where he is in the polls.

 

Rinse Penis and the GOP can hold its debates in front of whatever moderators it wants if all you want is melon ball questions. It could always do that. Trump's now famous idea has been around for decades. Fact of the matter is, if you had Limbaugh, Hannity, and Laura Ingraham (for example) asking the questions, your party'd be more split the morning after than it is now.

 

You quoted me to come up with this little newsflash nugget?

Hon.........it's not me who can't differentiate between CNBC and MSNBC.

 

She did herself no good with her terrible debate performance.

- - - Updated - - -

MSNBC?

 

How ironic, like the mainstream media, who do you think really believes you? LOL

 

Actually, you're wrong. The GOP candidates talk about issue almost everyday. Trump has done at least 6 or 7 media interviews himself during which he's discussed numerous issues. Cruz, Carson, Florina discuss issues all the time. Bush, who knows, I don't really care what he's saying. Even during the debate they discussed plenty of issues, so, despite the BIG story of the "media" being exposed for bias sucking all the air out of the room, your dead wrong.

 

Yes, and if you remember "way back then" Trump called out the moderators on that occasion too.

 

Well, now wait a minute, she's in the top five, but lets not forget Obama...he's on that list alongside a few others.

Progressives & dumb liberals don't care about her record, that's the problem. It's why we have Obama. Is all they care about is she's been chosen, she's not a Republican and she loves growing government. She can lie, pander, obfuscate & be as arrogant as she wants, it's fine with them. I know she's been a huge failure, you know it, too, but even if progressives know it (like those in the media), or even suspect it, they'll support her anyway.