Hillary declares victory over Benghazi panel, pivots to bash P P ‘witch hunt'

Sorry. Diplomatic compound that's considered US soil.

Sounds like an embassy....

 

Sound like...?

No, it's wasn't am embassy, nor even a consulate.

And even if it were (which it wasn't) -- you are wrong about being considered "U.S. Soil."

"There is a common misconception that Embassies and Consulates have extraterritoriality. As anecdotal evidence of this misconception, people will often say things like, “the US Embassy sits upon United States soil.” For the most part, this is not the case as extraterritoriality is not conferred upon an Embassy or Consulate, but in some situations extraterritoriality may be created by Treaty. "

Laws and Rules Regarding Extraterritoriality

 

Im talking vs the other party. But with the new polls out even he beats Hillary

http://nypost.com/2015/10/13/hillary-loses-to-all-gop-candidates-in-new-poll/

 

So in the Benghazi case, you're saying the law cites that this compound did not fall under US soil? I see your point about extraterritoriality but I don't see anything about that actual compound not serving as US soil. I'm happy to admit I'm wrong if you could show me that.

 

I just did.

 

what a joke, that's a fox news poll

they also said romney would win in a landslide

 

And the losers are her victims who depended on her to protect them. And she fell WOEFULLY short...and don't kid yourself. She has never lost one minute of sleep over it despite her unbelievable performance.

 

you don't know what you're talking about

security for diplomats is provided by the 'diplomatic security service'

not by secretary of state, hillary clinton

 

The Hillary Clinton victims are the GOP Benghazi committee.

 

Where Stevens was killed was a U.S. Consulate, so try again.

- - - Updated - - -

Her victim is her own campaign.

North Carolina: Trump vs. Clinton...PPP (D) Clinton 42, Trump 48 Trump +6
North Carolina: Bush vs. Clinton.....PPP (D) Clinton 46, Bush 43 Clinton +3
North Carolina: Carson vs. Clinton..PPP (D) Carson 49, Clinton 43 Carson +6
North Carolina: Rubio vs. Clinton....PPP (D) Rubio 48, Clinton 42 Rubio +6
North Carolina: Fiorina vs. Clinton..PPP (D) Fiorina 45, Clinton 43 Fiorina +2
North Carolina: Cruz vs. Clinton......PPP (D) Clinton 45, Cruz 46 Cruz +1
North Carolina: Trump vs. Sanders..PPP (D) Trump 48, Sanders 41 Trump +7
North Carolina: Bush vs. Sanders...PPP (D) Bush 46, Sanders 40 Bush +6
North Carolina: Carson vs. Sanders..PPP (D) Carson 48, Sanders 37 Carson +11

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/

Break out the big BBQ fork in NC........Hillary's done

 

No, it wasn't.

There was no US consulate in Benghazi. Ever.

Do you know anything?

 

Isn't that HillBilly country?

 

Geezuz Christ, people. This was a CIA operation. Get that.

From the Accountability Review Board:

UNCLASSIFIED:

"In December 2011, the Under Secretary for Management approved a one - year continuation of the U.S. Special Mission in Benghazi, which was never a consulate and never formally notified to the Libyan government. Steven arrived in Tripoli on May 26, 2012 to replace Cretz as Ambassador."

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/202446.pdf

 

Proof please!

- - - Updated - - -

You'll need to ask Kay Hagen about that!

 

did you not see this?:

 

Lady Ga Ga and Ben Affleck had Hillary's email address. Christopher Stephens didn't.

 

Maybe Stevens told Hillary he would expose the gun running to Al Queda like they did with the KLA, so poor ole Stevens got Fostered.

 

he had the had the email addresses of the relevant people

including top security personnel, members of the secretary's staff and the overall department

maybe you should stop making up fairy tales and tell the truth

 

But he didn't have Hillary's..wonder why that is?

 

like you care

 

Oh I do...don't you?

Why would Stephens, who Clinton personally appointed and who she claimed was a good friend, not have her email address? Is Lady Ga Ga a more valuable asset to foreign policy and national security than our ambassadors?

 

why haven't you spoken out about the 13 embassy/consulate attacks under bush?

60 people died in those and hardly a peep out of you guys over them

the answer is because this is a politically motivated smear

 

Let the Factchecker, 'splain it to you:
[h=3]Fact Check: Do ambassadors e-mail the secretary of state?[/h]

• Glenn Kessler
• 
  

THE FACT CHECKER | Republicans on the Benghazi Committee have repeatedly questioned why Sidney Blumenthal, a personal friend of former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton, had her private e-mail address while Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens did not. While one can certainly question Clinton’s judgment in paying attention to Blumenthal’s musings, there is a simple reason that an ambassador would not have the secretary of state’s private e-mail address.

It’s called the chain of command.


With nearly 200 ambassadors in the field, it would invite chaos if each could directly write the secretary of state.

Instead, ambassadors and other diplomats send reporting cables, which in turn are examined and processed by various levels of the State Department. If it’s an urgent matter, presumably it would come to the secretary’s attention. But many issues — by necessity in a 70,000-person organization — would be handled far below the secretary’s level.


For instance, take a look at some of the e-mails sent by Stevens that have been examined by congressional committees. On June 13, 2012, Stevens had an e-mail exchange with State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland about the department’s public statements in light of recent violence in Libya.

On June 12, 2012, he sent an e-mail to the director of the Office of Maghreb Affairs (which oversaw Libya) about the security situation in Benghazi.


But if Stevens needed to communicate directly to Clinton, it’s fairly certain he could have arranged it.
As former U.S. ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul tweeted:

As ambassador in Russia, I enjoyed multiple ways to communicate with Secretary Clinton. Email was never one of them.
— Michael McFaul (@McFaul) October 22, 2015

​

 

George Bush isn't running for President

 

exactly, all you care about is the politics, not the people