Why do people support Hillary Clinton?

They don't. Murders in America are investigated and we routinely put the murderers in jail and we also execute them in some states. We know terrorists killed these four Americans. Benghazi is not about solving their murders. Benghazi is about finding out why Obama instructed people to lie to us about their deaths. To not find out would be a disservice to the four dead Americans. The deaths of all Americans are investigated. The four dead in Benghazi deserve the same investigation as would to anyone else. The only difference is, Obama is abusing his power of office to stonewall the investigation. But don't take my word for it, ask Obama yourself the same questions and see if he answers you.

 

Now that's the first time I've been able to understand this without all the guff.

 

People love guff. Without the guff they start gravitating towards the favorite color threads. However I will do my best to provide guff free responses if you wish. I actually prefer it but on Political sites, you need to be on the offense most of the time.

 

Don't believe the liberal/radical/socialist media's spin on Trump.

I support a Rubio/Cruz ticket. I don't like Trump. But he's no nut. He's got his feet planted more firmly on the ground than Hillary. She's the one out in la-la land.

 

The paranoid attitude toward media that is not right wing need not enter into it. Conservative republicans are labeling the media celebrity a joke.

Actually, Clinton is running as a mainstream politician, and will likely be elected by Americans if Republicans cannot settle on a viable candidate. I expect Gator to be the default, but Carnival Cruz is not a realistic option for the ticket.

 

The American people know Clinton. They know she is far left on domestic issues and center-left on foreign policy. A clear majority (well over 50%) believes she's a liar.

My fear is that Americans will want a woman to be president and to hell with all other issues.

 

Please do not falsely attribute statements such as this to me.

Where did I ever make such a remark?

You can get in a tizzy over Clinton or any other politician, but please try to be honest.

 

Billionaires are not necessarily brilliant as is evident in this case. Example. Build a wall and make the Mexicans pay for it. Deport 11 million people You don't even have 1 million buses to deport 11 million people. Perhaps that will be his first priority. Use taxpayers money to build 1 million buses to deport 11 million people (All on the same day, no doubt) Don't forget that the 11 persons per bus will require three minders each as they are so dangerous, they could commit mass murder in order to stay in the US rather than be deported to a country that most of them haven't even arrived from

And a self admitted psychologically knife wielding retired brain surgeon who on his own would rush an armed terrorist.

Please do get it right.

 

We don't need to bus any of them. Stop employing them, stop feeding them, stop giving them housing, they will find their way back to mexico the same way they found their way here. Any American caught employing them serves 5 years mandatory prison.
Stop feeding the birds and they go elsewhere for food all on their own. No bus required.

 

What a good idea. Donald will supply from his billions the necessary dollars to imprison them.

Or alternatively and much more likely, raise taxation to pay for the building of prisons.

It's interesting to note where conservatives want their taxes to be spent.

 

Yes us conservatives are guilty of spending tax dollars enforcing or nations laws. How un leftist of us. Would you hire an illegal alien for your lawn crew knowing if someone turned you in you would get 5 years in prison? I wouldn't.

 

You wouldn't consider being the antagonist in the weekly shooting of Americans in schools, colleges and universities either, hopefully.

But it happens and will continue to happen.

 

Im sorry but Im not sure what you meant by this.

 

Could be ignorance.

 

Were you planning on addressing anything I asked or did you accidentally respond to the wrong poster?

 

You were asking the wrong poster. I'm not campaigning for Clinton.

I leave such judgements to the American electorate. If the GOP can find somebody as experienced and capable, that's whom they might elect.

Voting to surrender to the Bush the decision to attack Iraq was an egregious mistake that cost her the presidency in 2008. Whether it holds the same significance in 2016 is, again, something for the American people to determine.

Unless Randy Paul is the surprise Republican nominee, I doubt it will constitute as important a determinant as it had eight years ago.

 

The senators had the same information as the administration, but you know and I know that the administration disseminated that information which it KNEW to be wrong.

There were no votes to overthrow the governments of Libya or Egypt. There votes to prop those governments up, either. I didn't see anything unconstitutional either way.

 

Thank you for your reply. I now understand your views.

 

Hillary blamed 9/11 and her uterous for causing her to accept such a weatlh of campaign donations from Wall Street Banks. Surprise! Hillary was a Wall Street donor darling before 9/11, too

In Hillary Clinton’s worst moment in both debates, and it’s going to get worse, after Sanders’ tirade against Wall Street and their political donations. Hillary climbed on her high horse and played the 9/11 card against Sanders. The Old Hag got quite huffy at Sanders for trying to “impugn my integrity.”

Hillary then insisted that she took lots of Wall Street donations because she was working so hard work rebuilding the Wall Street Banks after the terrorist attacks that hit Twin Towers, and that women donate to her too. Completely bizarre, does she think she is working as an independent Senator for hire for Campaign Donors or something?

Here she is "explaining" why she is widely known as the Old Hag of Wall Street.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKJHmmx9QBE&feature=youtu.be

And then after a little research, lo and behold, it turns out that Hillary was raking in the Wall Street Cash before 9/11, too:

These Old Crooks just rake it in!

http://www.ibtimes.com/political-ca...ecipient-wall-street-cash-911-attacks-2185516

The sitting First Lady, out collecting "donations" from Wall Street while her hubby collects "speaking fees".

But they were apparently so happy with her, they continue to fill her coffers with "donations" and pay her family "speaking fees".

Sanders was wondering "what is it that they think they are getting for all this money"? Which is when Hillary bizarrely played first the 9/11 card and then the gender card.

Bizarre.