Trump would 'certainly implement' national database for U.S. Muslims

Repeats what they say or completely lies about what they say? Quote where Trump said what was claimed and give a source. If you cannot then it is a lie.

 

Replace Muslims with Jews. Nobody wants Hitler 2.0

 

Conservatives have become radicalized, oh yes indeedy do they have...

The GOP has become more and more extreme, to a point where it is barely recognizable from what it was in the 20th century. Even Ronald Reagan, and certainly Barry Goldwater, would not understand their party today.
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs...-rapid-radicalization-of-the-republican-party

The religious right has hijacked the party...

The Tea Party & Religious Right are Destroying the GOP
http://www.2016election.com/tea-party-religious-right-destroying-gop/

 

then Christians did the same with the inquisitions

but I think we both know most Christians and Muslims are good people.. it's the religious nuts of both we have to worry about

 

First of all, your link does not work, so obviously there is no original "fib."

More importantly, the reporter didn't ask anything "out of the blue." The topic of Trump's Muslim database came up the DAY BEFORE in a sit down interview at Trump Tower NYC.

That conversation went like this:

Yahoo News asked Trump whether his push for increased surveillance of American Muslims could include warrantless searches. He suggested he would consider a series of drastic measures.
“We’re going to have to do things that we never did before. And some people are going to be upset about it, but I think that now everybody is feeling that security is going to rule,” Trump said. “And certain things will be done that we never thought would happen in this country in terms of information and learning about the enemy. And so we’re going to have to do certain things that were frankly unthinkable a year ago.”
Yahoo News asked Trump whether this level of tracking might require registering Muslims in a database or giving them a form of special identification that noted their religion. He wouldn’t rule it out.
“We’re going to have to — we’re going to have to look at a lot of things very closely,” Trump said when presented with the idea. “We’re going to have to look at the mosques. We’re going to have to look very, very carefully.”

 

Ooops.

 

of course ...if christians start beheading americans and flying airliners into skyscrapers then Ill be ripping on them as well.

 

add pro-lifers to the list, they have been shown to be dangerous

 

they have already been there, done that..... the inquisitions

and don't forget about the two Conservative Christian mass killers we had recently here in the USA

I am sure you are ripping on all Christians about those things too.... or do you only blame the ones doing those horrible things?

.

 

What year did the spanish inquisitions take place?
What conservative christians killed in the name if christianity? Please name them.

 

But don't we pretty much already have that huge DNA database? How much of a challenge would it be for government to add muslims to it? I wouldn't be surprised if Trump's suggestion has already taken effect.

 

oh, so you do not want to ban the Muslim religion forever over this, just bash the bad guys of it now right?

because of this, Muslims will NEVER be able to say Muslims do not kill or torture, forever we can say, some have.... just like with Christians



two your second question..... there are more examples, abortion bombers, ect.. but here is two



http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/24/l...igned-up-on-tea-party-page-and-quoted-hitler/

"And in another, Houser cheered Muslim extremists for defending their religion.

“Yes it’s true, Muslims are alone in shutting down liberals that mock their God. They have my complete Christian respect.”"


"South Carolina Lutheran Pastor: Dylann Roof Was Church Member"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/19/dylann-roof-religion-church-lutheran_n_7623990.html

""He was on the roll of our congregation," Rev. Tony Metze of St. Paul's Lutheran Church, told The Huffington Post."

 

Ummm no he hasn't but please keep up the rightwing talking points.

 

So you are claiming all pro lifers are terrorists? That is racist. It is the same as saying all muslims are terrorists.

 

They have to keep trying to outdo each other to keep their base loyal.
Carson comes out saying that we should make all Muslims carry an ID card, Trump does his shtick. the next clown in the car ratchets up the hate mongering a bit more, and so it goes.
By election day, they will be calling for the summary execution of anyone who dares to look foreign, just to be sure no terrorists get by.
The right-wing movement in the US is sick.

 

That's what right-wingers say. Thanks for admitting it's racist.

 

I asked what year the inquisitions took place? (You brought it up)
I also asked you to name people who killed in the name of christianity. You posted two blogs one of which states it appears he was a christian but cites no evidence , both killers were crazy and neither killers killed in the name of their religion. Lastly you are citing people who have no connection to a radical christion group. Neither houser nor roof were part of an organized terrorist group. Isis is taking over countries. Hardly a couple of crazy people.

 

When pro lifers blow up clinics and assassinate doctors then yes they are all religious terrorists just as surely as you can blame all Muslims for the acts of a few.
Get it?

 

L

It's a basic first step.

When the military hunts for terrorists in the 3rd world Arab (*)(*)(*)(*) holes the first step in the operation is a database.

When the FBI follows its Muslim targets in the US the first step in the operation is a database.

 

R

Could be if it were something that the government published but they'd probably keep it secret.

Well unless Hillary decided to email it to her daughter, ha ha.

Or maybe they'll just hack it out from under the State Departments nose with their F- security rating and their complete willfulness to ignore security policies.

But seriously ISIS is already masterfully using social media for its recruitment.

They already know which individuals support them in America, and which groups.

But it's never been hard to find a radical because radicals are losers.

From ISIS to BLM to ELF and all the other radical terrorist organizations, the one thing that they all share in common is that they are populated with pure human garbage.

 

The Liberals won't believe radical Islamic terrorists are a threat until they start lopping off heads on the White House lawn.

 

Yes, but they arent committing large scale acts of terrorism in the name of God on a global scale. If they were, we'd be blaming all Christians as well.

 

Or IRS tax roles .

 

I would want a Muslim database before I would want a national firearm owner database. I am far more concerned about Muslims than I am gun owners.

I'd rather not have either one though. Maybe. I'd be tempted to have a Muslim list.

 

Radical Islamist terrorists are a threat.

Innocent Muslims are no threat.

Islam itself is no threat.

Punishing innocent people for acts that they think abhorrent, and from which some of them are fleeing, is the greatest threat to mankind, both morally and politically.