Ben Carson Confronted at Town Hall: 'Do You Think I Chose to Be Gay?'

Why are you operating under the delusion that something must be genetic for it to not be a choice?

 

The idea that there is a specific gene to point to is not likely going to happen. It is more likely that it will be a common gene among Homosexuals and Heterosexuals that is expressed differently. Genetic expression holds a lot of secrets and information on how genes work, when they are working, when they are shut off, why they are being expressed the way in which they are being expressed, how the environment impacts their expression etc.

The idea that there is an isolated "gay gene" unique to gays is juvenile. It's not that simple and clear like were identifying common nutrients according to their pigments or something else that is so obvious.

 

well he isn't 16 now, and he lived with milk a good number of years.

why wouldn't I?

why wouldn't I?

 

something doesn't have to be genetic to be a not be a choice.

 

No (*)(*)(*)(*).

Oh I dont know you are making the same arguments as pedophiles.

 

really? can you quote a pedophile argument and quote an argument I've made that is the same?

I believe this is about the 4th or 5th moronic claim you've made that I've asked you to provide evidence for. I'm still waiting for you to do so on even one of them.

 

So you haven't been trying to argue that sex with adolescents is not pedophilia? That's odd considering that you have attempted to limit pedophilia to only sex with prepubescent children.

That argument is word for word the argument you hear from pedophiles who pray on adolescents. It makes me wonder where you have learned such arguments. You dont really want to go down this path. Your words are already betraying you.

 

My question is this: Why..the...(*)(*)(*)(*)..do...you...care? It doesn't affect, nor effect, your life does it? Why can't y'all just mind your own damn business?

 

Wait, you're hinging your entire argument on ONE person? Thats just plain dumb. There are thousands of gays that never even look at a child like that.

 

`
They are on a mission from a god or goddess....that would be my first guess.
.

 

The God and goddess I believe in doesn't care who you love (sexually)...as long as it's not a child.

 

My complaint is a gay culture that does not stigmatize the rape of children. As long as the culture glorifies pedophiles like Harvey Milk the culture will still encourage rape of minors. As is obvious in my back and forth with Rahl who for some reason wants to insist that only sex with prepubescent minors counts as pedophilia essentially adopting the gay version of 'old enough to bleed old enough to breed'.

 

pedophilia is defined as the sexual attraction to prepubescent children. 16,17,18 year olds are not prepubescent children.

not odd at all, as that is the definition.

.
no it isn't. pedophiles prey on prepubescent children. ****philes prey on adolescents.

it's called learning a topic before commenting. you really need to try it.

I have no problem going down any path you'd like. So far, you haven't been correct in a single thing you've tried arguing in this thread.

- - - Updated - - -

not only that, but it's an outright fabrication. Harvey Milk was never even so much as accused of having sex with a child, let alone there being any evidence of such a crime.

 

Pedo means child and nothing more nothing less. Child rape activists have tried to argue that sex with adolescents is not pedophilia because they are evil. We can all see which side you are on.

I'd like to remind you that the 16 year old Jack was regarded by those how knew Milk as the oldest person that they had ever seen Milk with. Makes you wonder just how young the other children he raped were.

 

lol, How many times am I going to have to ask you to support the claim that Milk ever had sex with a prepubescent child?

.

it isn't my insistence. it's the actual (*)(*)(*)(*)ing definition of pedophilia.

 

nope. the definition of pedophilia is the sexual attraction to prepubescent children.

because it isn't pedophilia, it is ****philia.

nobody, at all, has ever said that milk had sex with a 16 year old Jack McKinley. Nobody.
.

since he was never even so much as accused of having sex with an underage person, let alone convicted.......................

 

Your opinion is disgusting and degrading to ALL gays. Gays do not condone child molesting. Child molesters are a completely different category.

 

I know that. The sad fact is that windigo is DESPERATELY using that for the whole basis of their non-arguement.

 

The culture condones child molestation. If it didn't Harvey Milk wouldn't be a hero. The culture is nothing more than the collective consensus of the norms. The gay culture is right up there with the Muslim culture on how it views molestation of minors.

 

The culture in no way condones child molestation. No more so that elvis or jerry lewis fans do.

Harvey milk didn't rape a child.

Yea, kinda like how popular elvis or jerry lewis is/was. wait, weren't they straight?

 

<Mod Edit>

- - - Updated - - -

Yes he did many of them. 16 year olds are still children. And FYI the 16 year old is regarded as the oldest partner Milk had.

 

That is not really the game I'm playing. The game I'm playing is geared more towards getting someone to say things publicly that they should keep secret.

 

Says the medical and psychological institutions.

nope. pedophile is defined as the sexual attraction to prepubescent children. You can not like that definition all you want, but it's still the definition. sorry

my arguments are simply reality. reality doesn't change because you don't like it.

then for the love of god, please FINALLY provide a shred of evidence for this claim. I have asked at least 7 times.

no, they are teenagers.

FYI, not he isn't. He was never even as much as accused of sleeping with a 16 year old, or anyone younger for that matter.

- - - Updated - - -

I have no problem publically proving you wrong by correcting you in pretty much every post.

 

Not according to the law or basic english.

Law & English > Psychobabble

Your arguments are the same arguments used by pedophiles. Your words are betraying you.

I would have but you proved it yourself. The oldest example you could find was 16 year old.

This isn't the dark-ages teenagers are still children.

 

Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). Thats your warped perception of one instance.